Suppr超能文献

谵妄的生物标志物:系统评价。

Biomarkers in delirium: A systematic review.

机构信息

Centre for Interventions in Infection, Inflammation and Immunity (4i) and School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Centre for Interventions in Infection, Inflammation and Immunity (4i) and School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Cognitive Impairment Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2021 Aug;147:110530. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110530. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric disorder associated with prolonged hospital stays, and increased morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is frequently missed due to varying disease presentation and lack of standardized testing. We examined biomarkers as diagnostic or prognostic indicators of delirium, and provide a rational basis for future studies.

METHOD

Systematic review of literature published between Jan 2000 and June 2019. Searches included: PubMed; Web of Science; CINAHL; EMBASE; COCHRANE and Medline. Additional studies were identified by searching bibliographies of eligible articles.

RESULTS

2082 relevant papers were identified from all sources. Seventy-three met the inclusion criteria, all of which were observational. These assessed a range of fourteen biomarkers. All papers included were in the English language. Assessment methods varied between studies, including: DSM criteria; Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) or CAM-Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Delirium severity was measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). Delirium was secondary to post-operative dysfunction or acute medical conditions.

CONCLUSION

Evidence does not currently support the use of any one biomarker. However, certain markers were associated with promising results and may warrant evaluation in future studies. Heterogeneity across study methods may have contributed to inconclusive results, and more clarity may arise from standardization of methods of clinical assessment. Adjusting for comorbidities may improve understanding of the pathophysiology of delirium, in particular the role of confounders such as inflammation, cognitive disorders and surgical trauma. Future research may also benefit from inclusion of other diagnostic modalities such as EEG as well as analysis of genetic or epigenetic factors.

摘要

背景

谵妄是一种常见的神经精神疾病,与住院时间延长、发病率和死亡率增加有关。由于疾病表现多样且缺乏标准化检测,因此常被漏诊。我们研究了生物标志物作为谵妄的诊断或预后指标,并为未来的研究提供了合理的依据。

方法

对 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间发表的文献进行系统综述。检索包括:PubMed;Web of Science;CINAHL;EMBASE;COCHRANE 和 Medline。通过检索合格文章的参考文献,还确定了其他一些研究。

结果

从所有来源共确定了 2082 篇相关论文。其中 73 篇符合纳入标准,均为观察性研究。这些研究评估了 14 种生物标志物。所有纳入的论文均为英文。研究方法在不同研究之间有所不同,包括:DSM 标准;意识模糊评估法(CAM)或 CAM-重症监护病房(ICU)。使用谵妄评定量表(DRS)来评估谵妄严重程度。谵妄继发于术后功能障碍或急性内科疾病。

结论

目前尚无证据支持使用任何一种生物标志物。然而,某些标志物与有希望的结果相关,可能需要在未来的研究中进行评估。研究方法的异质性可能导致结果不确定,通过临床评估方法的标准化可能会更加清晰。调整合并症可能会有助于更好地理解谵妄的病理生理学,特别是炎症、认知障碍和手术创伤等混杂因素的作用。未来的研究也可能受益于包括脑电图等其他诊断方式的纳入,以及对遗传或表观遗传因素的分析。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验