Wang Z F, Xu J, Luo F Q, Yu G Y, Lin Y
Second Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 8;101(21):1592-1597. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200902-02547.
To report a method of visualized saphenous nerve block (VSNB) through minimally invasive far medial-subvastus approach distal to the adductor canal in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and investigate the effect of VSNB in this way on postoperative pain relief. A total of 100 patients with knee osteoarthritis were prospectively included from June 2018 to October 2019, 29 males and 71 females, aged 50-87(70±8) years. All patients undergoing TKA through minimally invasive far medial-subvastus approach were randomized to visualized saphenous nerve block combined with periarticular infiltration analgesia group (Group VSNB+PIA) or only periarticular infiltration analgesia group (Group PIA),50 cases in each group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain degree of patients. Furthermore, the scores of VAS in resting and active state at 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours after operation and the proportion of patients receiving parecoxib within 72 hours after operation were compared between the two groups. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of VAS scores in resting state after surgery(=15.295,<0.05).The postoperative VAS scores of Group VSNB+PIA at 4, 8, 12, 24 hours at resting state were 1.3±0.8, 1.4±0.7, 1.7±0.8, 3.1±0.8 respectively, which were all significantly lower than those of Group PIA (1.6±0.9, 1.8±0.8, 2.3±0.9, 3.6±0.8) (<0.05). The overall difference in terms of VAS scores at active state after surgery was statistically significant between the two groups(=18.532, <0.05). The postoperative VAS scores of Group VSNB+PIA at 4, 8, 12, 24 hours at active state were 2.0±0.8, 2.2±0.7, 2.7±0.6, 3.7±0.7 respectively, which were all significantly lower than those of Group PIA (2.3±0.8, 2.7±0.7, 3.3±0.8, 4.4±0.7)(<0.05). Fourteen percent of patients (7/50) in VSNB+PIA group accepted parecoxib within 72 hours after surgery, which was significantly lower than that in PIA group (34%, 17/50) (<0.05). It is easy to expose the saphenous nerve beyond the adductor canal through minimally invasive far medial-subvastus approach. The Combination therapy of VSNB+PIA is more effective than the simple per-articular infiltration analgesia in providing pain relief after total knee arthroplasty.
报告一种在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中通过微创远内侧-股薄肌下入路在收肌管远端进行可视化隐神经阻滞(VSNB)的方法,并研究以此方式进行VSNB对术后疼痛缓解的效果。2018年6月至2019年10月前瞻性纳入100例膝骨关节炎患者,男29例,女71例,年龄50 - 87(70±8)岁。所有通过微创远内侧-股薄肌下入路行TKA的患者被随机分为可视化隐神经阻滞联合关节周围浸润镇痛组(VSNB + PIA组)或仅关节周围浸润镇痛组(PIA组),每组50例。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者疼痛程度。此外,比较两组患者术后4、8、12、24、48、72小时静息和活动状态下的VAS评分以及术后72小时内接受帕瑞昔布治疗的患者比例。两组术后静息状态下的VAS评分差异有统计学意义(=15.295,<0.05)。VSNB + PIA组术后4、8、12、24小时静息状态下的VAS评分分别为1.3±0.8、1.4±0.7、1.7±0.8、3.1±0.8,均显著低于PIA组(1.6±0.9、1.8±0.8、2.3±0.9、3.6±0.8)(<0.05)。两组术后活动状态下的VAS评分总体差异有统计学意义(=18.532,<0.05)。VSNB + PIA组术后4、8、12、24小时活动状态下的VAS评分分别为2.0±0.8、2.2±0.7、2.7±0.6、3.7±0.7,均显著低于PIA组(2.3±0.8、2.7±0.7、3.3±0.8、4.4±0.7)(<0.05)。VSNB + PIA组14%的患者(7/50)在术后72小时内接受了帕瑞昔布治疗,显著低于PIA组(34%,17/50)(<0.05)。通过微创远内侧-股薄肌下入路易于在收肌管外暴露隐神经。VSNB + PIA联合治疗在全膝关节置换术后缓解疼痛方面比单纯关节周围浸润镇痛更有效。