Al-Naim Abdullah F, Afify N, Sedky A, Ibrahim S S
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, King Faisal University, P.O.B 400, Al-Hassa, 31982 Saudi Arabia.
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, 71516 Egypt.
Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2021;127(7):486. doi: 10.1007/s00339-021-04560-3. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
We report here structural morphology and nonlinear behavior of pure and co-doped ZnFeMO with (M = Cu, Ni and ( = 0.00, 0.10) and (0.00 ≤ ≤ 0.20)) at different sintering temperatures ( = 850 and 1000 °C). It is found that the co-doping of ZnO by (Fe + Cu) or (Fe + Ni) up to 0.30 does not deform the well-known wurtzite structure of ZnO, as well as pure and 0.1 of Fe-doped ZnO. The SEM micrographs did not show any secondary phases at the boundaries of grains as compared to ZnO, the average grain size is decreased for Fe and (Fe + Cu) samples, while it is increased for (Fe + Ni) samples. The nonlinear coefficient and breakdown field are generally increased by 0.1 of Fe addition, but they are shifted to lower values as increases for all samples. Furthermore, they are gradually increased/decreased to higher/lower values for (Fe + Cu/Fe + Ni) samples up to 0.30 of co-doping content. The values of and are increased from 30.06, 2115.38 V/cm for ZnO at 850 °C to 50.07, 5012 V/cm by (0.1Fe + 0.2Cu) co-doping, and from 23.53, 1956.52 V/cm to 45.58, 4750 V/cm at 1000 °C, while they are, respectively, decreased by (0.1Fe + 0.2Ni) to 13.19, 312 V/cm and 11.85, 172.42 V/cm. Similar behavior was generally obtained for nonlinear conductivity and height of potential barrier φ, whereas the vice is versa for the behavior of leakage current and residual voltage . Our results are discussed in terms of the comparative participation between the effects of co-doping of (Fe + Cu) and (Fe + Ni) to ZnO for supporting the potential barrier as compared to individual doping by Fe, Cu and Ni. This study perhaps recommended these samples for optoelectronic and ferromagnetic investigation after COVID-19 is over.
我们在此报告了纯的以及共掺杂的ZnFeMO(M = Cu、Ni,且= 0.00、0.10以及(0.00 ≤≤ 0.20))在不同烧结温度(= 850和1000 °C)下的结构形态和非线性行为。研究发现,(Fe + Cu)或(Fe + Ni)对ZnO进行共掺杂,掺杂量高达0.30时,不会使ZnO著名的纤锌矿结构发生变形,纯ZnO以及0.1的Fe掺杂ZnO也是如此。与ZnO相比,扫描电子显微镜图像未显示出晶粒边界处有任何第二相,Fe和(Fe + Cu)样品的平均晶粒尺寸减小,而(Fe + Ni)样品的平均晶粒尺寸增大。非线性系数和击穿场强通常因添加0.1的Fe而增大,但随着所有样品中含量的增加,它们会向较低值偏移。此外,对于(Fe + Cu/Fe + Ni)样品,共掺杂含量高达0.30时,它们会逐渐增大/减小至更高/更低的值。和的值从850 °C时ZnO的30.06、2115.38 V/cm增加到(0.1Fe + 0.2Cu)共掺杂时的50.07、5012 V/cm,在1000 °C时从23.53、1956.52 V/cm增加到45.58、4750 V/cm,而(0.1Fe + 0.2Ni)共掺杂时它们分别降至13.19、312 V/cm和11.85、172.42 V/cm。对于非线性电导率和势垒高度φ,通常也得到了类似的行为,而漏电流和残余电压的行为则相反。我们根据(Fe + Cu)和(Fe + Ni)对ZnO共掺杂与Fe、Cu和Ni单独掺杂相比在支持势垒方面的比较参与情况对结果进行了讨论。这项研究或许建议在新冠疫情结束后对这些样品进行光电和铁磁研究。