• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Providing a Second Opinion to Dr. Google with the WWW Framework.利用万维网框架向谷歌医生提供第二诊疗意见。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):222-224. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06895-2. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Asking "Dr. Google" for a Second Opinion: The Devil Is in the Details.向“谷歌医生”寻求第二意见:细节决定成败。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Mar;7(2):479-481. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
3
Paging Dr. Google: The Changing Face of Plastic Surgery.呼叫谷歌医生:整形手术的新面貌。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Nov;138(5):1133-1136. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002722.
4
The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google output.搜索引擎选择和排序标准对疫苗接种观念及态度的影响:两项操纵谷歌搜索结果的实验
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 2;16(4):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2642.
5
Public hospital quality report awareness: evidence from National and Californian Internet searches and social media mentions, 2012.公立医院质量报告认知度:来自2012年全国及加利福尼亚州互联网搜索和社交媒体提及情况的证据
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 11;4(3):e004417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004417.
6
[Second opinion clinic: is the Web Babel Syndrome treatable?].[二次诊断诊所:网络巴别塔综合症可治吗?]
Clin Ter. 2011;162(6):575-83.
7
Personal health records: retrieving contextual information with Google Custom Search.个人健康记录:使用谷歌自定义搜索检索上下文信息。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;182:10-8.
8
Getting to the top of Google: search engine optimization.登上谷歌搜索榜首:搜索引擎优化。
J Med Pract Manage. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(5):301-3.
9
Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.通过对患者信息网站进行客观评分增强颅缝早闭患儿家长的能力。
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jun;27(4):874-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002623.
10
Ethical and legal implications in seeking and providing a second medical opinion.寻求和提供第二种医学意见中的伦理和法律问题。
Dig Dis. 2008;26(1):11-7. doi: 10.1159/000109379. Epub 2007 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Generative Artificial Intelligence Through ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: Clinical Applications and Challenges.通过ChatGPT和其他大语言模型实现的生成式人工智能在眼科中的临床应用与挑战
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Sep 9;3(4):100394. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100394. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Dr. Google: Physicians-The Web-Patients Triangle: Digital Skills and Attitudes towards e-Health Solutions among Physicians in South Eastern Poland-A Cross-Sectional Study in a Pre-COVID-19 Era.谷歌医生:网络-患者三角关系:波兰东南部医生的数字技能和对电子健康解决方案的态度——新冠疫情前的横断面研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;20(2):978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020978.
3
Self-reported COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and hesitancy among autistic adults.自闭症成人自述的 COVID-19 疫苗接种接受度和犹豫情况。
Vaccine. 2022 May 26;40(24):3288-3293. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.060. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Online Health Information Seeking by Parents for Their Children: Systematic Review and Agenda for Further Research.家长为子女在线搜索健康信息:系统评价及进一步研究议程。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 25;22(8):e19985. doi: 10.2196/19985.
2
How to fight an infodemic.如何应对信息疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.
3
Eradicating Jargon-Oblivion-A Proposed Classification System of Medical Jargon.消除行话——遗忘——一种医学行话的拟议分类系统
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1861-1864. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05526-1. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Asking "Dr. Google" for a Second Opinion: The Devil Is in the Details.向“谷歌医生”寻求第二意见:细节决定成败。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Mar;7(2):479-481. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
5
How Dr Google Is Impacting Parental Medical Decision Making.“谷歌医生”如何影响父母的医疗决策
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2019 Nov;39(4):583-591. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2019.07.011.
6
The effect of Dr Google on doctor-patient encounters in primary care: a quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study.谷歌医生对基层医疗中医患诊疗过程的影响:一项定量、观察性横断面研究。
BJGP Open. 2017 May 17;1(2):bjgpopen17X100833. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100833.
7
When Bad News Isn't Necessarily Bad: Recognizing Provider Bias When Sharing Unexpected News.当坏消息不一定是坏消息时:在分享意外消息时识别提供者偏见。
Pediatrics. 2018 Jul;142(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0503.
8
Dr. Google and Premature Consent: Patients Who Trust the Internet More Than They Trust Their Provider.“谷歌医生”与过早同意:比起信任医疗服务提供者,患者更信任互联网。
HEC Forum. 2018 Sep;30(3):253-265. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9338-z.
9
The REDE Model of Healthcare Communication: Optimizing Relationship as a Therapeutic Agent.医疗保健沟通的REDE模型:将关系优化为治疗因素
J Patient Exp. 2014 May;1(1):8-13. doi: 10.1177/237437431400100103. Epub 2014 May 1.
10
Take the HEAT: A pilot study on improving communication with angry families.采取热行动:一项关于改善与愤怒家属沟通的试点研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jun;100(6):1235-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

利用万维网框架向谷歌医生提供第二诊疗意见。

Providing a Second Opinion to Dr. Google with the WWW Framework.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):222-224. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06895-2. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-021-06895-2
PMID:34100240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8738830/
Abstract

While clinicians are often aware that their patients seek second opinions, they are rarely taught specific skills for how to effectively communicate with patients when they are the ones providing that second opinion. The nuances of these skills are amplified when the second opinion being provided is to the ubiquitous (and often anonymous) Dr. Google. In this perspective, the authors share an approach for discussing a patient's pre-visit health-related internet findings. After emphasizing the importance of setting the stage, they describe the WWW Framework which proposes "waiting" before responding with data, getting to the "what" of the patient's search, and "working together" to negotiate a plan. This stepwise approach is designed to provide psychological safety, build a therapeutic alliance, and empower collaborative treatment planning.

摘要

虽然临床医生通常意识到他们的患者会寻求第二意见,但当他们提供第二意见时,他们很少被教授如何与患者进行有效沟通的具体技能。当提供的第二意见是针对无处不在(且通常是匿名的)的谷歌医生时,这些技能的细微差别就会被放大。在这个角度下,作者分享了一种讨论患者就诊前与健康相关的互联网搜索结果的方法。在强调设置阶段的重要性之后,他们描述了 WWW 框架,该框架建议在使用数据回复之前“等待”,了解患者搜索的“内容”,并“共同努力”制定计划。这种逐步的方法旨在提供心理安全感,建立治疗联盟,并增强协作治疗计划。