Davis John K
Department of Philosophy, California State University, Fullerton, P.O. Box 6848, Fullerton, CA, 92834-6868, USA.
HEC Forum. 2018 Sep;30(3):253-265. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9338-z.
A growing number of patients make up their minds about some medical issue before they see their provider, either by googling their symptoms or asking a friend. They've made up their minds before coming in, and they resist their provider's recommendations even after receiving information and advice from their provider. This is a new kind of medical autonomy problem; it differs from cases of standard consent, futility, or conscientious refusal. Providers sometimes call this problem "Dr. Google." I call it premature consent. Providers may wonder whether these patient decisions command the same deference and respect as other patient decisions. The answer is "no," for these patients are neither fully competent nor properly informed. They typically appear to be competent, but competence includes the ability to deliberate, and they are not deliberating well when they make up their minds before consulting a qualified provider. They seem informed, especially after talking to their provider, but they are misinformed about what sources of medical advice to trust. Moreover, being informed requires believing the information one has received, and these patients sometimes don't believe the information their provider gives them.
越来越多的患者在看医生之前就对某些医疗问题做出了决定,要么通过搜索自己的症状,要么询问朋友。他们在就诊前就已经拿定主意,甚至在从医生那里获得信息和建议后,仍会抗拒医生的建议。这是一种新型的医疗自主权问题;它不同于标准的同意、无意义或出于良心的拒绝等情况。医生有时将这个问题称为“谷歌医生”。我称之为过早同意。医生可能会怀疑这些患者的决定是否应与其他患者的决定受到同样的尊重。答案是否定的,因为这些患者既不完全具备行为能力,也没有得到充分的信息。他们通常看起来有行为能力,但行为能力包括思考能力,而他们在咨询合格医生之前就做出决定时,并没有进行充分的思考。他们似乎了解情况,尤其是在与医生交谈之后,但他们对于应该信任哪些医疗建议来源却存在误解。此外,了解情况需要相信所收到的信息,而这些患者有时并不相信医生给他们的信息。