Karahan Nazım, Yılmaz Barış, Öztermeli Ahmet, Kaya Murat, Duman Serda, Çiçek Esin Derin
Clinic of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Çorlu State Hospital, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021 May;55(3):220-226. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.20072.
The aim of this study was to evaluate glenohumeral morphologic differences and their correlation between glenohumeral instability and rotator cuff pathology.
Two-hundred radiographs and 100 MRI scans of 100 patients in whom the diagnosis of Anterior Shoulder Instability (Anl) or Rotator Cuff Tear (RCT) was arthroscopically verified were retrospectively identified and included in the study. All the patients were categorized into two groups: 50 patients with Anl (23 female, 28 male; mean age = 29 ± 7.4) and 50 patients with RCT (28 female, 22 male). Two separate control groups were then formed, one of which included contralateral shoulders of patients in the AnI group, and the other consisted of contralateral shoulders of patients in the RCT group. The x-ray and MRI scans were examined by an orthopedic surgeon and a radiologist. The Acromial Index (AI) and the Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) were measured on true anteroposterior shoulder radiographs; Glenoid Inclination (GI), Glenoid Version (GV), and Acromion Angulation (AA) were measured on MRI.
In the AnI group, the measurements were as followed: AI, 0.66 ± 0.03; CSA, 33 ° ± 2.85; GI, 3.4° ± 6.2; GV, 4.1 ± 4.3; and AA, 12.9 ± 8.3. In the RCT group, AI 0.71 ± 0.04; CSA, 36° ± 2.69; GI, 9.1 ± 5; GV, 6.7 ° ± 5.7; and AA, 14.3° ± 8.7. A moderate correlation was found between CSA and GI (r = 0.41, P = 0.001) and between AI and GI (r = 0.42, P = 0.014). A weak correlation was found between AI and GI in the AnI group (r = 0.22, P = 0.001). The inter- and intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficients were respectively 0.81 and 0.84 for AI, 0.88 and 0.92 for CSA, 0.72 and 0.76 for GI, 0.69 and 0.73 for GV, and 0.72 and 0.77 for AA.
The results of this study have shown that lower AI, GI, and antevert GV may be associated with AnI. Investigating CSA, AI, and GV could be useful for diagnostic evaluation of patients with AnI.
Level III, Diagnostic Study.
本研究旨在评估盂肱关节形态学差异及其在盂肱关节不稳与肩袖病变之间的相关性。
回顾性纳入并研究了100例经关节镜证实诊断为前肩不稳(Anl)或肩袖撕裂(RCT)患者的200张X线片和100份MRI扫描影像。所有患者分为两组:50例Anl患者(23例女性,28例男性;平均年龄=29±7.4岁)和50例RCT患者(28例女性,22例男性)。然后形成两个独立的对照组,其中一组包括Anl组患者的对侧肩,另一组由RCT组患者的对侧肩组成。X线片和MRI扫描影像由一名骨科医生和一名放射科医生进行检查。在真正的肩关节前后位X线片上测量肩峰指数(AI)和临界肩角(CSA);在MRI上测量盂肱关节倾斜度(GI)、盂肱关节扭转角(GV)和肩峰角(AA)。
在Anl组中,测量结果如下:AI为0.66±0.03;CSA为33°±2.85;GI为3.4°±6.2;GV为4.1±4.3;AA为12.9±8.3。在RCT组中,AI为0.71±0.04;CSA为36°±2.69;GI为9.1±5;GV为6.7°±5.7;AA为14.3°±8.7。发现CSA与GI之间(r=0.41,P=0.001)以及AI与GI之间(r=0.42,P=0.014)存在中度相关性。在Anl组中发现AI与GI之间存在弱相关性(r=0.22,P=0.001)。观察者间和观察者内组内相关系数分别为:AI为0.81和0.84,CSA为0.88和0.92,GI为0.72和0.76,GV为0.69和0.73,AA为0.72和0.77。
本研究结果表明,较低的AI、GI和前倾的GV可能与Anl相关。研究CSA、AI和GV可能有助于对Anl患者进行诊断评估。
三级,诊断性研究。