Global Health Policy Unit, School of Social & Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
SPECTRUM Consortium (Shaping Public Health Policies to Reduce Inequalities and Harm), United Kingdom.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 May;82(3):387-394.
The World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) is increasingly seen as offering a template for advancing effective global health governance in other spheres, notably including alcohol. In thinking about lessons that can be transferred, there is a simplifying tendency to overstate the FCTC's transformative impacts and, more problematically, to neglect the significance of evolving policies, norms, and practices that collectively enabled its development. This can lead to underestimating the extent to which the FCTC's evolution was protracted and contested, while issues that need to be addressed as prerequisites for an international legal instrument for alcohol are viewed as only feasible after its achievement. This problem is examined here with reference to managing conflict of interest with unhealthy commodity industries. Although protection of policymaking from tobacco industry interference under FCTC Article 5.3 has been hugely significant, it was feasible because of wide-ranging developments in practices across diverse governance actors at national and international levels. This article illustrates the legitimating and enabling significance to the FCTC of measures including emergent internal practices within the WHO, the World Bank's decision to withdraw funding from tobacco projects, steps by host governments to restrict support for the overseas expansion of tobacco transnationals, and changes in civil society and researcher engagement with industry actors. Recent developments in seeking to manage conflicts of interest in nutrition policy in the WHO and at national levels highlight the scope for progress in the absence of an international legal instrument. The article concludes by considering implications of these varying innovations for the future development of effective global governance for alcohol.
世界卫生组织(世卫组织)烟草控制框架公约(FCTC)越来越被视为提供了一个模板,可用于在其他领域推进有效的全球卫生治理,特别是包括酒精。在考虑可以转移的经验教训时,有一种简化的倾向,即夸大 FCTC 的变革性影响,更成问题的是,忽视了不断发展的政策、规范和实践的重要性,这些政策、规范和实践共同促成了其发展。这可能导致低估了 FCTC 演变的漫长和争议性,而作为国际酒精法律文书的先决条件需要解决的问题,被视为只有在该文书达成后才可行。本文通过参考管理与不健康商品行业的利益冲突来探讨这一问题。尽管根据 FCTC 第 5.3 条保护决策免受烟草业干扰具有重要意义,但这是可行的,因为在国家和国际各级的不同治理行为者中,广泛的做法发生了变化。本文举例说明了包括世卫组织内部新出现的内部做法、世界银行决定停止对烟草项目的供资、东道国政府采取措施限制对烟草跨国公司海外扩张的支持,以及民间社会和研究人员与行业行为者的参与方式等措施,对 FCTC 的合法化和赋权意义。最近在世卫组织和国家一级寻求管理营养政策利益冲突的事态发展,突显了在没有国际法律文书的情况下取得进展的范围。本文最后考虑了这些不同创新对未来有效全球治理的影响。