Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Mar 1;11(3):398-400. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.178.
Addressing conflicts of interest (COIs) when developing and implementing policies to address commercial determinants of health is pivotal to ensure that these policies are free from commercial and other vested interests of unhealthy commodities industry. As a concept, this is well accepted within the tobacco control community, and supported by the existence of an international treaty, the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). But in nutrition policy the engagement of the food industry appears to remain controversial, as efforts to create partnerships are still underway. There is a need to undertake evaluation of existing COI policies to assess their implementation and outcomes, creating best practice models that can be replicated, and understanding how to change norms within governments. Additionally, a review of existing norms, codes of conduct, and ethics to determine their impact on preventing COI would guide future implementation of these measures. Finally, governments, academics, and advocates should consider how existing tools, guidelines or other instruments could help frame the COI discussion to ensure its political feasibility. There is a need for a discussion on whether the current approach of separate policies for distinct industries is preferable than a broader COI policy that would be applicable to a wide range of unhealthy commodities and across governmental sectors.
在制定和实施解决健康的商业决定因素的政策时,解决利益冲突(COI)至关重要,以确保这些政策不受不健康商品行业的商业和其他既得利益的影响。作为一个概念,这在烟草控制界得到了广泛认可,并得到了世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约(FCTC)的支持。但在营养政策中,食品行业的参与似乎仍然存在争议,因为建立伙伴关系的努力仍在进行中。有必要对现有的 COI 政策进行评估,以评估其实施和结果,创建可复制的最佳实践模型,并了解如何改变政府内部的规范。此外,还需要审查现有的规范、行为准则和道德准则,以确定它们对防止 COI 的影响,从而为这些措施的未来实施提供指导。最后,政府、学术界和倡导者应考虑现有的工具、准则或其他手段如何有助于构建 COI 讨论,以确保其具有政治可行性。有必要讨论一下,目前针对不同行业制定单独政策的方法是否优于更广泛的 COI 政策,后者将适用于广泛的不健康商品和政府各部门。