Department of Psychiatry, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan.
Psychogeriatrics. 2021 Sep;21(5):716-721. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12729. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
Suspected non-Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology (SNAP) shows Alzheimer's disease (AD)-like neurodegeneration; however, amyloid β, which is a biological marker in AD, remains within normal levels. Since the effectiveness of anti-dementia drugs for AD on SNAP is unknown, it is important to distinguish between patients with SNAP and AD. We aimed to compare decreases in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), precuneus, and parietal lobe critical to AD between SNAP and AD groups using the easy Z-score imaging system in single-photon emission computed tomography (eZIS-SPECT).
We retrospectively analysed eZIS-SPECT data of 13 SNAP and 24 AD patients. The three indicators (severity, extent, and ratio) that distinguished AD patients from healthy controls in previous studies were automatically calculated and were compared between the SNAP and AD groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the three indicators of eZIS in discriminating between the two groups.
The mean values of severity, extent, and ratio were significantly lower in the SNAP group than in the AD group (P = 0.024, P = 0.044, and P = 0.045, respectively). The AUC values for severity, extent, and ratio were 0.668, 0.683, and 0.692, respectively.
The present study suggests that SNAP shows milder reduction of rCBF in the PCC, precuneus, and parietal lobe as compared to AD. However, it may be difficult to distinguish between SNAP and AD with the degrees of decrease in rCBF in these regions.
疑似非阿尔茨海默病病理生理学(SNAP)表现出类似阿尔茨海默病(AD)的神经退行性变;然而,作为 AD 的生物标志物的淀粉样β仍处于正常水平。由于抗 AD 痴呆药物对 SNAP 的疗效未知,因此区分 SNAP 和 AD 患者非常重要。我们旨在使用单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)中的简易 Z 评分成像系统(eZIS-SPECT)比较 SNAP 和 AD 组中与 AD 相关的后扣带回皮质(PCC)、楔前叶和顶叶的局部脑血流(rCBF)减少。
我们回顾性分析了 13 例 SNAP 和 24 例 AD 患者的 eZIS-SPECT 数据。自动计算了先前研究中区分 AD 患者与健康对照者的三个指标(严重程度、范围和比例),并在 SNAP 和 AD 组之间进行了比较。使用接收者操作特征曲线分析和曲线下面积(AUC)评估 eZIS 三个指标在区分两组方面的诊断性能。
SNAP 组的严重程度、范围和比例的平均值明显低于 AD 组(P=0.024,P=0.044 和 P=0.045)。严重程度、范围和比例的 AUC 值分别为 0.668、0.683 和 0.692。
本研究表明,与 AD 相比,SNAP 表现出 PCC、楔前叶和顶叶 rCBF 减少程度较轻。然而,用这些区域 rCBF 的减少程度可能难以区分 SNAP 和 AD。