Männik Jaan, Teshima Tetsuhiko F, Wolfrum Bernhard, Yang Da
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA.
J Appl Phys. 2021 Jun 7;129(21):210905. doi: 10.1063/5.0051875. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
All living cells constantly experience and respond to mechanical stresses. The molecular networks that activate in cells in response to mechanical stimuli are yet not well-understood. Our limited knowledge stems partially from the lack of available tools that are capable of exerting controlled mechanical stress to individual cells and at the same time observing their responses at subcellular to molecular resolution. Several tools such as rheology setups, micropipetes, and magnetic tweezers have been used in the past. While allowing to quantify short-time viscoelastic responses, these setups are not suitable for long-term observations of cells and most of them have low throughput. In this Perspective, we discuss lab-on-a-chip platforms that have the potential to overcome these limitations. Our focus is on devices that apply shear, compressive, tensile, and confinement derived stresses to single cells and organoid cultures. We compare different design strategies for these devices and highlight their advantages, drawbacks, and future potential. While the majority of these devices are used for fundamental research, some of them have potential applications in medical diagnostics and these applications are also discussed.
所有活细胞都不断经历并响应机械应力。细胞中因机械刺激而激活的分子网络尚未得到充分理解。我们有限的认知部分源于缺乏能够对单个细胞施加可控机械应力并同时以亚细胞到分子分辨率观察其反应的可用工具。过去曾使用过几种工具,如流变学装置、微量移液器和磁性镊子。虽然这些装置能够量化短期粘弹性反应,但它们不适合对细胞进行长期观察,而且大多数通量较低。在这篇观点文章中,我们讨论了有潜力克服这些局限性的芯片实验室平台。我们关注的是对单细胞和类器官培养施加剪切、压缩、拉伸和限制衍生应力的装置。我们比较了这些装置的不同设计策略,并突出了它们的优点、缺点和未来潜力。虽然这些装置中的大多数用于基础研究,但其中一些在医学诊断方面具有潜在应用,本文也将对此进行讨论。