Suppr超能文献

来曲唑联合氟维司群治疗绝经后 HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌患者的成本效果分析:加拿大医疗保健视角。

Cost Effectiveness of Ribociclib in Combination with Fulvestrant for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Who Have Received No or Only One Prior Line of Endocrine Therapy: A Canadian Healthcare Perspective.

机构信息

Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), 822 Boylston Street, Suite 206, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Sep;39(9):1045-1058. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01027-4. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The MONALEESA-3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ribociclib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant for patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). This analysis evaluated the cost effectiveness of ribociclib plus fulvestrant versus fulvestrant in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC from a Canadian healthcare payer perspective.

METHODS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for ribociclib plus fulvestrant versus fulvestrant, was estimated using a semi-Markov cohort model developed in Microsoft Excel, with states for progression-free, post-progression, and dead. A 15-year time horizon was used. Survival distributions for progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS), and time to discontinuation (TTD) were based on parametric survival distributions fit to data from MONALEESA-3. Health-state utilities were estimated using EQ-5D index values collected in MONALEESA-3. Direct costs of ABC treatment (medication and administration costs, follow-up and monitoring, adverse events, subsequent treatments) were based on Canadian-specific values from published sources. Costs (2019 CAN$) and QALYs were discounted at 1.5% annually.

RESULTS

In the base case, ribociclib plus fulvestrant was estimated to result in gains of 1.19 life-years and 0.96 QALYs versus fulvestrant, at an incremental cost of $151,371. The ICER of ribociclib plus fulvestrant versus fulvestrant was $157,343 per QALY gained based on the mean of probabilistic analyses. Results were sensitive to parametric distributions used for projecting long-term TTD, PFS, and PPS.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, ribociclib plus fulvestrant is projected to result in substantial gains in QALYs compared with fulvestrant. At its current list price, ribociclib used in combination with fulvestrant is likely to be cost effective in these patients at a threshold ICER of $157,343. These results may be useful in deliberations regarding reimbursement and access to this treatment.

摘要

背景

MONALEESA-3 试验证明了瑞博西林联合氟维司群对比安慰剂联合氟维司群用于激素受体阳性和人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性(HR+/HER2-)晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者的疗效和安全性。本分析从加拿大医疗保健支付者的角度评估了 HR+/HER2-ABC 患者中瑞博西林联合氟维司群对比氟维司群的成本效果。

方法

使用在 Microsoft Excel 中开发的半马尔可夫队列模型估算瑞博西林联合氟维司群对比氟维司群的增量成本效果比(ICER),表示为瑞博西林联合氟维司群对比氟维司群每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本。使用基于 MONALEESA-3 数据拟合的参数生存分布来估算无进展生存期(PFS)、进展后生存期(PPS)和停药时间(TTD)的生存分布。健康状态效用值使用 MONALEESA-3 中收集的 EQ-5D 指数值进行估算。ABC 治疗的直接成本(药物和管理成本、随访和监测、不良事件、后续治疗)基于从已发表资源中获得的加拿大特定值。成本(2019 年加元)和 QALYs 按每年 1.5%贴现。

结果

在基准情况下,瑞博西林联合氟维司群预计比氟维司群增加 1.19 年的寿命和 0.96 个 QALY,增量成本为 151,371 加元。基于概率分析的平均值,瑞博西林联合氟维司群对比氟维司群的 ICER 为每个 QALY 增加 157,343 加元。结果对用于预测长期 TTD、PFS 和 PPS 的参数分布敏感。

结论

对于 HR+/HER2-ABC 患者,与氟维司群相比,瑞博西林联合氟维司群预计会使 QALY 获得显著增加。在其现行定价下,瑞博西林联合氟维司群在这些患者中可能具有成本效果,其增量成本效果比的阈值为 157,343 加元。这些结果可能有助于有关该治疗方案报销和准入的讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验