• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下及导航辅助双隧道技术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位喙锁韧带增强的临床疗效。

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic and navigation-assisted two tunnel technique for coracoclavicular ligament augmentation of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

机构信息

Division of Arthroscopy, Joint Surgery and Sport Injuries, Department of Orthopedics, Trauma, and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 9;22(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04406-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-021-04406-2
PMID:34107940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8191052/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to present a navigated image-free augmentation technique for the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments and to report the clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

From 2013 to 2018, 35 eligible patients were treated with our navigated image-free ACJ- and CC-augmentation technique. The average follow-up was 3 years. Follow-up evaluations included the Constant-Murley Score, subjective shoulder value, Taft score, and the acromioclavicular joint instability (ACJI) score. The patients' quality of life was assessed using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire. In addition, in accordance with the instability criteria, radiographs were evaluated before surgery, after surgery, and during follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, 25 patients (71%) suffered an acute type V disruption, 5 (14%) had a type IV disruption, and 5 (14%) had an acute Rockwood type IIIb injury. The mean Constant-Murley Score was 90 (range: 56-100; p = 0.53) on the injured side, and the mean subjective shoulder value was 92% (range: 80-100%). The mean Taft and ACJI scores were 10 (range: 4-12) and 86 (range: 34-100), respectively and the mean EQ-5D was 86 (range: 2-100). The mean CC difference of the injured side was 4 mm (range: 1.9-9.1 mm) at follow-up, which was not significantly different than that of the healthy side (p = 0.06). No fractures in the area of the clavicle or the coracoid were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The arthroscopic- and navigation-assisted treatment of high-grade ACJ injuries in an anatomical double-tunnel configuration yields similar clinical and radiological outcomes as the conventional technique using an aiming device. Precise positioning of the navigation system prevents multiple drillings, which avoids fractures.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在介绍一种用于肩锁关节(ACJ)和喙锁(CC)韧带的无图像导航增强技术,并报告其临床和影像学结果。

方法

2013 年至 2018 年,35 名符合条件的患者接受了我们的导航无图像 ACJ 和 CC 增强技术治疗。平均随访时间为 3 年。随访评估包括 Constant-Murley 评分、主观肩部评分、Taft 评分和肩锁关节不稳定(ACJI)评分。使用 EuroQol-5D(EQ-5D)问卷评估患者的生活质量。此外,根据不稳定标准,在术前、术后和随访时对 X 线片进行评估。

结果

总体而言,25 例(71%)患者为急性 V 型脱位,5 例(14%)为 IV 型脱位,5 例(14%)为急性 Rockwood Ⅲb 型损伤。受伤侧平均 Constant-Murley 评分为 90 分(范围:56-100;p=0.53),平均主观肩部评分为 92%(范围:80-100%)。平均 Taft 和 ACJI 评分为 10 分(范围:4-12)和 86 分(范围:34-100),平均 EQ-5D 评分为 86 分(范围:2-100)。随访时受伤侧 CC 差值平均为 4mm(范围:1.9-9.1mm),与健侧无显著差异(p=0.06)。未报告锁骨或喙突区域有骨折。

结论

关节镜和导航辅助治疗解剖双隧道构型的高级 ACJ 损伤,其临床和影像学结果与使用瞄准器的常规技术相似。导航系统的精确定位可防止多次钻孔,从而避免骨折。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfe/8191052/7a35f3d9e314/12891_2021_4406_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfe/8191052/731036c9a7a0/12891_2021_4406_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfe/8191052/cb6fea0dff5e/12891_2021_4406_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfe/8191052/7a35f3d9e314/12891_2021_4406_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfe/8191052/731036c9a7a0/12891_2021_4406_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfe/8191052/cb6fea0dff5e/12891_2021_4406_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfe/8191052/7a35f3d9e314/12891_2021_4406_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic and navigation-assisted two tunnel technique for coracoclavicular ligament augmentation of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.关节镜下及导航辅助双隧道技术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位喙锁韧带增强的临床疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 9;22(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04406-2.
2
Arthroscopic Stabilization of Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: Triple- Versus Single-Bundle Reconstruction.关节镜下治疗慢性肩锁关节脱位:双束与单束重建对比
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):482-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546515615583. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
3
All-Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Severe Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations.全关节镜下重建重度慢性肩锁关节脱位。
Arthroscopy. 2019 May;35(5):1324-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.058.
4
Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint.肩锁关节分离:通过缝合锚修复喙锁韧带和不可吸收缝线固定肩锁关节。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Oct;12(5):1362-1371. doi: 10.1111/os.12771. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
5
Clinical Outcome of a Modified Coracoid Tunnel-Free Coracoclavicular Sling Technique With Remnant Preservation for the Treatment of High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Report of 48 Cases With 2 to 5 Years of Follow-up.保留残端的改良喙突隧道免固定喙锁韧带重建术治疗重度肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效:2-5 年随访 48 例报告
Am J Sports Med. 2021 May;49(6):1612-1618. doi: 10.1177/03635465211002149. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
6
Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.关节镜下喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位
J Nippon Med Sch. 2018;85(3):166-171. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2018_85-24.
7
Hybrid coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations yields good functional and radiographic results.慢性肩锁关节脱位的杂交型肩锁关节和肩峰锁骨关节重建可获得良好的功能和影像学结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jun;30(6):2084-2091. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06790-7. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment.手术可改善Rockwood IV型脱位的临床和影像学结果,而Rockwood III型脱位则受益于保守治疗。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2143-2151. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06193-0. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
9
The frequency of reduction loss after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device, and its effect on clinical and radiological results.关节镜下使用双纽扣装置固定急性肩锁关节脱位后复位丢失的频率及其对临床和影像学结果的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Apr 8;15(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01674-x.
10
Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.关节镜辅助下急性高分级肩锁关节分离的稳定。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1507-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546511399379. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Accuracy of Distal Clavicle Fracture Classifications-Do We Need an Amendment to Imaging Modalities or Fracture Typing?锁骨远端骨折分类的准确性——我们是否需要对成像方式或骨折分型进行修正?
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 24;11(19):5638. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195638.
2
Horizontal instability after acromioclavicular joint reduction using the two-hole technique is preferred over the loop technique: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.使用双孔技术进行肩锁关节复位后的水平不稳定优于环扎技术:一项单盲随机临床试验。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Sep;25(3):224-229. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.00871. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the Radiological and Functional Results of Tight Rope and Clavicular Hook Plate Technique in the Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.肩锁关节脱位切开复位内固定术后的影像学和功能比较。
J Invest Surg. 2022 Mar;35(3):693-696. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1897196. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
Comparison of the Results of Hook Plate and Endo-Button Used in the Surgical Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Separation.钩钢板与Endo-Button在肩锁关节分离手术治疗中的结果比较。
Cureus. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):e11987. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11987.
3
EQ-5D-5L Slovenian population norms.
EQ-5D-5L 斯洛文尼亚人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 7;18(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01584-w.
4
US population norms for the EQ-5D-5L and comparison of norms from face-to-face and online samples.美国 EQ-5D-5L 人群正常值及面对面和在线样本正常值比较。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):803-816. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02650-y. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: an additional acromioclavicular cerclage does not improve horizontal stability in double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique.肩锁关节重建:双喙锁隧道技术中附加肩锁关节环形扎带并不能提高水平稳定性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3827-3834. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05674-1. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
6
Suture Button Versus Hook Plate for Acute Unstable Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Meta-analysis.缝线纽扣与钩钢板治疗急性不稳定肩锁关节脱位的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(4):1023-1030. doi: 10.1177/0363546519858745. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Prospective Assessment of the Clavicular Hook Plate Versus the Double Double-Button Suture Procedure.急性高等级肩锁关节分离的稳定:锁骨钩板与双双纽扣缝线术的前瞻性评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2725-2734. doi: 10.1177/0363546518788355. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
8
Comparison of hook plate with versus without double-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.钩钢板与双隧道喙锁韧带重建治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的比较:前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
9
Application and measurement properties of EQ-5D to measure quality of life in patients with upper extremity orthopaedic disorders: a systematic literature review.EQ-5D在测量上肢骨科疾病患者生活质量中的应用及测量属性:一项系统文献综述
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jul;138(7):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2933-x. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
10
The Integrity of the Acromioclavicular Capsule Ensures Physiological Centering of the Acromioclavicular Joint Under Rotational Loading.肩锁关节旋转加载下,肩锁关节囊的完整性可确保其生理中心定位。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1432-1440. doi: 10.1177/0363546518758287. Epub 2018 Mar 20.