Suppr超能文献

草甘膦抗性作物的历史和展望。

History and Outlook for Glyphosate-Resistant Crops.

机构信息

Green Ways Consulting LLC, Landenberg, PA, USA.

Sr. Scientist (ret.), Corteva Agriscience, Wilmington, DE, USA.

出版信息

Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021;255:67-91. doi: 10.1007/398_2020_54.

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, commercially referred to as glyphosate-tolerant (GT), started the revolution in crop biotechnology in 1996. Growers rapidly accepted GR crops whenever they became available and made them the most rapidly adopted technology in agriculture history. Adoption usually meant sole reliance on glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, CAS No. 1071-83-6] for weed control. Not surprisingly, weeds eventually evolved resistance and are forcing growers to change their weed management practices. Today, the widespread dissemination of GR weeds that are also resistant to other herbicide modes-of-action (MoA) has greatly reduced the value of the GR crop weed management systems. However, growers continue to use the technology widely in six major crops throughout North and South America. Integrated chemistry and seed providers seek to sustain glyphosate efficacy by promoting glyphosate combinations with other herbicides and stacking the traits necessary to enable the use of partner herbicides. These include glufosinate {4-[hydroxy(methyl)phosphinoyl]-DL-homoalanine, CAS No. 51276-47-2}, dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid, CAS No. 1918-00-9), 2,4-D [2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid, CAS No. 94-75-7], 4-hydroxyphenyl pyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors, and other herbicides. Unfortunately, herbicide companies have not commercialized a new MoA for over 30 years and have nearly exhausted the useful herbicide trait possibilities. Today, glyphosate-based crop systems are still mainstays of weed management, but they cannot keep up with the capacity of weeds to evolve resistance. Growers desperately need new technologies, but no technology with the impact of glyphosate and GR crops is on the horizon. Although the expansion of GR crop traits is possible into new geographic areas and crops such as wheat and sugarcane and could have high value, the Roundup Ready® revolution is over. Its future is at a nexus and dependent on a variety of issues.

摘要

草甘膦抗性(GR)作物,商业上称为草甘膦耐受(GT),于 1996 年开创了作物生物技术革命。种植者只要获得 GR 作物,就会迅速接受,并使其成为农业史上采用最快的技术。采用通常意味着仅依赖草甘膦[N-(膦酸甲基)甘氨酸,CAS 号 1071-83-6]进行杂草防治。毫不奇怪,杂草最终进化出了抗性,迫使种植者改变他们的杂草管理措施。如今,广泛传播的 GR 杂草也对其他除草剂作用模式(MoA)具有抗性,这大大降低了 GR 作物杂草管理系统的价值。然而,种植者仍在北美和南美六大主要作物中广泛使用该技术。综合化学和种子供应商通过推广草甘膦与其他除草剂的组合,并堆叠使用合作伙伴除草剂所需的特性,来维持草甘膦的功效。这些特性包括草铵膦{4-[羟基(甲基)膦酰基]-DL-高丙氨酸,CAS 号 51276-47-2}、麦草畏(3,6-二氯-2-甲氧基苯甲酸,CAS 号 1918-00-9)、2,4-D[2-(2,4-二氯苯氧基)乙酸,CAS 号 94-75-7]、4-羟基苯基丙酮酸双加氧酶抑制剂、乙酰辅酶 A 羧化酶(ACCase)抑制剂和其他除草剂。不幸的是,除草剂公司 30 多年来没有商业化一种新的 MoA,并且几乎耗尽了有用的除草剂特性可能性。如今,基于草甘膦的作物系统仍然是杂草管理的支柱,但它们跟不上杂草进化出抗性的能力。种植者迫切需要新技术,但没有一种具有草甘膦和 GR 作物影响力的技术即将出现。尽管 GR 作物特性的扩展是可能的,进入新的地理区域和作物,如小麦和甘蔗,并可能具有高价值,但 Roundup Ready®的革命已经结束。它的未来处于十字路口,并取决于各种问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验