• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关闭虚假记忆之门:加工水平和刺激类型对拒绝知觉上和语义上不同的分心物的影响。

Closing the door to false memory: the effects of levels-of-processing and stimulus type on the rejection of perceptually vs. semantically dissimilar distractors.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, ul. Wóycickiego 1/3 bud. 14, 01-938, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2022 Apr;86(3):968-982. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01544-z. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-021-01544-z
PMID:34110472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8942911/
Abstract

False recognition memory for nonstudied items that share features with targets can be reduced by retrieval monitoring mechanisms. The recall-to-reject process, for example, involves the recollection of information about studied items that disqualifies inconsistent test probes. Monitoring for specific features during retrieval may be enhanced by an encoding orientation that is recapitulated during retrieval. In two experiments, we used concrete words or door scenes as materials and manipulated the level of processing at study and the type of distractors presented at test. We showed that for the verbal material, semantic level of processing at study results in an effective rejection of semantically inconsistent distractors. However, for the pictorial material, the perceptual level of processing leads to an effective rejection of perceptually inconsistent distractors. For targets, the effect of levels of processing was observed for words but not for pictures. The results suggest that retrieval monitoring mechanisms depend on interactions between encoding orientation, study materials, and differentiating features of distractors.

摘要

通过提取监测机制,可减少与目标具有共同特征的未学习项目的错误识别记忆。例如,召回拒绝过程涉及对已学项目信息的回忆,这些信息可排除不一致的测试探针。在提取过程中对特定特征进行监测,可能会受到提取过程中再现的编码定向的增强。在两项实验中,我们使用具体单词或门场景作为材料,并在研究时操纵处理水平以及在测试时呈现的干扰物类型。我们表明,对于口头材料,研究时的语义处理水平可有效拒绝语义上不一致的干扰物。但是,对于图片材料,知觉处理水平可有效拒绝知觉上不一致的干扰物。对于目标,在单词上观察到处理水平的影响,但在图片上则没有。结果表明,提取监测机制取决于编码定向、研究材料和干扰物区分特征之间的相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/8942911/0f9f891bef74/426_2021_1544_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/8942911/ddc935558d88/426_2021_1544_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/8942911/3d1d1e8fbfb7/426_2021_1544_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/8942911/06f244bdec3c/426_2021_1544_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/8942911/0f9f891bef74/426_2021_1544_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/8942911/ddc935558d88/426_2021_1544_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/8942911/3d1d1e8fbfb7/426_2021_1544_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/8942911/06f244bdec3c/426_2021_1544_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/8942911/0f9f891bef74/426_2021_1544_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Closing the door to false memory: the effects of levels-of-processing and stimulus type on the rejection of perceptually vs. semantically dissimilar distractors.关闭虚假记忆之门:加工水平和刺激类型对拒绝知觉上和语义上不同的分心物的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Apr;86(3):968-982. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01544-z. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Representation of shared surface information and false memory for abstract versus concrete pictures in the conjoint recognition paradigm.联合识别范式中抽象与具体图片的共享表面信息表示和虚假记忆。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):950-973. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01899-5. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
3
Framing memories: How the retrieval query format shapes the neural bases of remembering.构建记忆:检索查询格式如何塑造记忆的神经基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Aug;89:309-319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.036. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
4
Levels-of-processing effects on context and target recollection for words and pictures.加工水平对词和图片的语境及目标记忆的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103127. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103127. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
5
Two mechanisms of constructive recollection: Perceptual recombination and conceptual fluency.建构性回忆的两种机制:知觉重组与概念流畅性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Nov;42(11):1747-1758. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000273. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
6
The role of semantically related distractors during encoding and retrieval of words in long-term memory.语义相关干扰项在长期记忆中单词编码和检索过程中的作用。
Memory. 2016 Jul;24(6):801-11. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1053491. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
7
Memory as discrimination: what distraction reveals.记忆作为辨别力:分心揭示的内容。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Nov;41(8):1238-51. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0327-4.
8
Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new "foil" information.限制检索的目标导向机制预测对新“陪衬”信息的后续记忆。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Aug;89:356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
9
What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.要点是什么?图式对真假记忆背后神经关联的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
10
Semantic processes leading to true and false memory formation in schizophrenia.导致精神分裂症真、假记忆形成的语义加工。
Schizophr Res. 2013 Jul;147(2-3):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Representation of shared surface information and false memory for abstract versus concrete pictures in the conjoint recognition paradigm.联合识别范式中抽象与具体图片的共享表面信息表示和虚假记忆。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):950-973. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01899-5. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
Development and validation of an experimental verbal Episodic Memory task in Spanish.发展和验证西班牙语实验性词语情节记忆任务。
Codas. 2023 Sep 18;35(4):e20220067. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022067es. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Levels-of-processing effects on context and target recollection for words and pictures.加工水平对词和图片的语境及目标记忆的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103127. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103127. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
2
Testing Interactions in Multinomial Processing Tree Models.检验多项式加工树模型中的交互作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 1;10:2364. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02364. eCollection 2019.
3
Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory.熟悉度、再认和识别记忆中的受试者工作特征 (ROC) 曲线。
Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):855-876. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00922-8.
4
Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?非正态数据:方差分析仍然是一个有效的选择吗?
Psicothema. 2017 Nov;29(4):552-557. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383.
5
Doors for memory: A searchable database.记忆之门:一个可搜索的数据库。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Nov;69(11):2111-8. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1087582. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
6
Using warnings to reduce categorical false memories in younger and older adults.利用警告减少年轻人和老年人的类别错误记忆。
Memory. 2016 Jul;24(6):853-63. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1059454. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
7
Dual recollection in episodic memory.情景记忆中的双重回忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Aug;144(4):816-43. doi: 10.1037/xge0000084. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
8
Disregarding familiarity during recollection attempts: content-specific recapitulation as a retrieval orientation strategy.回忆尝试时忽略熟悉度:特定内容概括作为一种检索导向策略。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):134-47. doi: 10.1037/a0038363. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
9
The two recollections.这两段回忆。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Oct;121(4):563-99. doi: 10.1037/a0037668.
10
The influence of forward and backward associative strength on false memories for encoding context.正向和反向联想强度对编码情境错误记忆的影响。
Memory. 2015;23(7):1093-111. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.959527. Epub 2014 Oct 14.