Instituto Português de Oncologia, Porto, Portugal.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil-Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 10;11(1):12323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91723-0.
To assess adherence to standard clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of patients undergoing prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy in four European countries using clinical audits as part of the international IROCA project. Multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of 240 randomly-selected patients treated for PCa (n = 40/centre) in the year 2015 at six European hospitals. Clinical indicators applicable to general and PCa-specific radiotherapy processes were evaluated. All data were obtained directly from medical records. The audits were performed in the year 2017. Adherence to clinical protocols and practices was satisfactory, but with substantial inter-centre variability in numerous variables, as follows: staging MRI (range 27.5-87.5% of cases); presentation to multidisciplinary tumour board (2.5-100%); time elapsed between initial visit to the radiation oncology department and treatment initiation (42-102.5 days); number of treatment interruptions ≥ 1 day (7.5-97.5%). The most common deviation from standard clinical practice was inconsistent data registration, mainly failure to report data related to diagnosis, treatment, and/or adverse events. This clinical audit detected substantial inter-centre variability in adherence to standard clinical practice, most notably inconsistent record keeping. These findings confirm the value of performing clinical audits to detect deviations from standard clinical practices and procedures.
评估在四个欧洲国家中,通过临床审计作为国际 IROCA 项目的一部分,对接受前列腺癌 (PCa) 放疗的患者的诊断和治疗标准临床实践的依从性。对 2015 年在六家欧洲医院接受 PCa 治疗的 240 名随机选择的患者(每个中心 40 名)进行了多机构、回顾性队列研究。评估了适用于一般和 PCa 特定放疗过程的临床指标。所有数据均直接从病历中获得。审计于 2017 年进行。临床协议和实践的依从性令人满意,但在许多变量方面存在很大的中心间差异,如下所示:分期 MRI(27.5-87.5%的病例);多学科肿瘤委员会的报告(2.5-100%);从最初访问放射肿瘤科到开始治疗的时间(42-102.5 天);治疗中断次数≥1 天(7.5-97.5%)。最常见的不符合标准临床实践的情况是数据登记不一致,主要是未能报告与诊断、治疗和/或不良事件相关的数据。这项临床审计发现,在遵守标准临床实践方面存在显著的中心间差异,最明显的是记录保存不一致。这些发现证实了进行临床审计以发现偏离标准临床实践和程序的价值。