Martin Shanique A, Patel Viren, Morrison Shane D, Kahn David, Satterwhite Thomas, Nazerali Rahim
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;45(4):1860-1868. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02378-1. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
BACKGROUND: Outcomes of gender-affirming chest surgery can be variable. Placement of nipple-areolar complexes and orientation of scars can drastically affect the aesthetic outcomes of these procedures, as may observer gender identity. Here, we compared attention and perception of outcomes following gender-affirming chest surgery between laypersons, based on gender identity. METHODS: Transgender and cisgender participants were enrolled and shown images of surgery naïve chests and postoperative masculinized and feminized chests, blinded to the gender identity of the photographed subject. Gaze data were captured using the Tobii X2 60 eye-tracking device. Participants scored the perceived gender and aesthetic appearance of each image. RESULTS: Eighteen cisgender and 14 transgender participants were enrolled. When viewing male chests, transgender participants spent significantly longer fixated on the nipples (naïve: 802 vs. 395 ms; p = 0.02, masculinized: 940 vs. 692 ms, p = 0.002). For masculinized chests, cisgender participants spent significantly longer fixated on the inframammary scar (483 vs. 391 ms; p = 0.04). On images of feminized chests, transgender participants spent longer viewing the nipples when compared to cisgender participants (1017 vs. 847 ms; p = 0.04). Cisgender viewers spent longer fixating on the postoperative scar on feminized chests (113 vs. 59 ms; p = 0.02) and also viewed feminized chests as significantly more masculine and masculinized chests as more feminine, when compared to transgender participants (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use eye-tracking to assess how laypersons assess chests for gender determination. The findings suggest that observer gender identity has an effect on areas of focus and gender perception of chests that underwent gender-affirmation surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
背景:性别肯定性胸部手术的结果可能存在差异。乳头乳晕复合体的位置和疤痕的方向会极大地影响这些手术的美学效果,观察者的性别认同也可能产生影响。在此,我们基于性别认同,比较了普通人群对性别肯定性胸部手术后结果的关注和认知。 方法:招募了跨性别者和顺性别者参与者,并向他们展示未经手术的胸部以及术后男性化和女性化胸部的图像,且不让他们知道被拍摄对象的性别认同。使用Tobii X2 60眼动追踪设备捕捉注视数据。参与者对每张图像的感知性别和美学外观进行评分。 结果:招募了18名顺性别者和14名跨性别者参与者。在查看男性胸部时,跨性别者参与者注视乳头的时间明显更长(未经手术:802毫秒对395毫秒;p = 0.02,男性化:940毫秒对692毫秒,p = 0.002)。对于男性化胸部,顺性别者参与者注视乳房下疤痕的时间明显更长(483毫秒对391毫秒;p = 0.04)。在女性化胸部的图像上,与顺性别者参与者相比,跨性别者参与者注视乳头的时间更长(1017毫秒对847毫秒;p = 0.04)。顺性别观察者注视女性化胸部术后疤痕的时间更长(113毫秒对59毫秒;p = 0.02),并且与跨性别者参与者相比,他们认为女性化胸部更具男性气质,男性化胸部更具女性气质(p < 0.05)。 结论:这是第一项使用眼动追踪来评估普通人群如何通过胸部判断性别的研究。研究结果表明,观察者的性别认同会影响对接受性别肯定性手术胸部的关注区域和性别认知。 证据级别III:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266 。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021-8
Aesthet Surg J. 2021-9-14
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021-4
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-2
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017-4
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022-10
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017-12
Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023-12-23
Aesthet Surg J. 2020-8-14
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019-7
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019-5
JAMA Surg. 2018-12-1
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018-12
Clin Plast Surg. 2018-7