• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在胆囊腺癌治疗过程中胆道侵犯的程度与腹膜癌病的发展独立相关。

Degree of biliary tract violation during treatment of gallbladder adenocarcinoma is independently associated with development of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Division of General Surgery, Portland, Oregon, USA.

OHSU School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;124(4):581-588. doi: 10.1002/jso.26569. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1002/jso.26569
PMID:34115368
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is often incidentally diagnosed after cholecystectomy. Intra-operative biliary tract violations (BTV) have been recently associated with development of peritoneal disease (PD). The degree of BTV may be associated with PD risk, but has not been previously investigated.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with initially non-metastatic GBC treated at our institution from 2003 to 2018. Patients were grouped based on degree of BTV during their treatment: major (e.g., cholecystotomy with bile spillage, n = 27, 29%), minor (e.g., intra-operative cholangiogram, n = 18, 19%), and no violations (n = 48, 55%). Overall survival (OS) and peritoneal disease-free survival (PDFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were identified; the median age was 64 years (range 31-87 years). Seventy-six (82%) were incidentally diagnosed. The median follow-up was 23 months; 20 (22%) patients developed PD. The 3-year PDFS for patients with major, minor, and no BTV was 52%, 83%, and 98%, respectively (major vs. none: p <  0.001; minor vs. none: p <  0.01). BTV was not associated with 5-year OS (HR 1.53, p =  0.16).

CONCLUSION

Increasing degree of BTV is associated with higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with GBC and should be considered during preoperative risk stratification. Reporting biliary tract violations during cholecystectomy is encouraged.

摘要

背景

胆囊癌(GBC)常在胆囊切除术后偶然诊断。术中胆道损伤(BTV)最近与腹膜疾病(PD)的发展有关。BTV 的程度可能与 PD 风险相关,但尚未得到先前的研究。

方法

我们回顾了 2003 年至 2018 年在我院治疗的初始非转移性 GBC 患者。根据治疗期间 BTV 的程度将患者分组:主要(例如,胆囊切开术伴胆汁溢出,n=27,29%)、次要(例如,术中胆管造影,n=18,19%)和无侵犯(n=48,55%)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 比例风险模型评估总生存期(OS)和腹膜疾病无复发生存期(PDFS)。

结果

共确定了 93 例患者;中位年龄为 64 岁(范围 31-87 岁)。76 例(82%)为偶然诊断。中位随访时间为 23 个月;20 例(22%)患者发生 PD。主要、次要和无 BTV 的患者 3 年 PDFS 分别为 52%、83%和 98%(主要与无:p<0.001;次要与无:p<0.01)。BTV 与 5 年 OS 无关(HR 1.53,p=0.16)。

结论

在 GBC 患者中,BTV 程度的增加与腹膜癌病的风险增加相关,在术前风险分层时应考虑这一点。鼓励报告胆囊切除术中的胆道侵犯。

相似文献

1
Degree of biliary tract violation during treatment of gallbladder adenocarcinoma is independently associated with development of peritoneal carcinomatosis.在胆囊腺癌治疗过程中胆道侵犯的程度与腹膜癌病的发展独立相关。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;124(4):581-588. doi: 10.1002/jso.26569. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
Intraoperative bile spillage is associated with worse survival in gallbladder adenocarcinoma.术中胆汁外溢与胆囊腺癌患者较差的生存率相关。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;120(4):603-610. doi: 10.1002/jso.25617. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
Managing the incidentally detected gallbladder cancer: algorithms and controversies.偶然发现的胆囊癌的处理:算法和争议。
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S108-S119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.367. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
4
Adverse Outcomes After Bile Spillage in Incidental Gallbladder Cancers: A Population-based Study.偶然胆囊癌胆汁外溢后的不良结局:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):139-144. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003325.
5
Do hepatic-sided tumors require more extensive resection than peritoneal-sided tumors in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer? Results of a retrospective multicenter study.对于T2期胆囊癌患者,肝侧肿瘤是否比腹膜侧肿瘤需要更广泛的切除?一项回顾性多中心研究的结果
Surgery. 2017 Sep;162(3):515-524. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
6
Clues to predict incidental gallbladder cancer.预测胆囊偶发癌的线索。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018 Apr;17(2):149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Factors Affecting Survival-5-Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Institute.胆囊偶发癌:发生率、危险因素和影响生存的因素——来自一家三级医疗中心的 5 年经验。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2020 Sep;51(3):980-987. doi: 10.1007/s12029-019-00347-1.
8
Is there a role for cholecystectomy in gallbladder carcinoma discovered to be unresectable for cure at laparotomy?对于在剖腹手术中发现无法根治性切除的胆囊癌,胆囊切除术是否有作用?
World J Surg. 2008 Dec;32(12):2683-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9763-x.
9
Gallbladder cancer: Defining the indications for primary radical resection and radical re-resection.胆囊癌:明确原发性根治性切除术和根治性再次切除术的适应证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):833-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9097-6. Epub 2006 Nov 11.
10
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approach in Treating Gallbladder Cancer.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗胆囊癌的比较。
J Surg Res. 2019 Feb;234:269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.025. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Bile spillage in incidental gallbladder cancer is not an independent predictor for survival: A multi-institute retrospective cohort study.意外胆囊癌中的胆汁外溢并非生存的独立预测因素:一项多机构回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106919. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106919.
2
Gallbladder adenocarcinoma diagnosed retrospectively after initial resection of abdominal wall adenocarcinoma with unidentified primary source: a case report and review of the literature.腹壁腺癌初次切除术后回顾性诊断为胆囊腺癌且原发灶不明:一例病例报告及文献复习
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 6;15:1609239. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1609239. eCollection 2025.
3
Practices in the Management of Incidental Gallbladder Cancer.
意外胆囊癌的管理实践
South Asian J Cancer. 2023 Aug 10;13(3):177-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1764151. eCollection 2024 Jul.