Coppock Dagan, Baram Michael, Chang Anna Marie, Henwood Patricia, Kubey Alan, Summer Ross, Zurlo John, Li Michael, Hess Bryan
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Division of Pulmonary, Department of Medicine, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0252591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252591. eCollection 2021.
During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, mortality associated with the disease declined in the United States. The standard of care for pharmacological interventions evolved during this period as new and repurposed treatments were used alone and in combination. Though these medications have been studied individually, data are limited regarding the relative impact of different medication combinations. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the association of COVID-19-related mortality and observed medication combinations and to determine whether changes in medication-related practice patterns and measured patient characteristics, alone, explain the decline in mortality seen early in the COVID-19 pandemic.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a multi-hospital healthcare system exploring the association of mortality and combinations of remdesivir, corticosteroids, anticoagulants, tocilizumab, and hydroxychloroquine. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of mortality for both the overall population and the population stratified by intensive care and non-intensive care unit admissions. A separate model was created to control for the change in unmeasured variables over time.
For all patients, four treatment combinations were associated with lower mortality: Anticoagulation Only (OR 0.24, p < 0.0001), Anticoagulation and Remdesivir (OR 0.25, p = 0.0031), Anticoagulation and Corticosteroids (OR 0.53, p = 0.0263), and Anticoagulation, Corticosteroids and Remdesivir (OR 0.42, p = 0.026). For non-intensive care unit patients, the same combinations were significantly associated with lower mortality. For patients admitted to the intensive care unit, Anticoagulation Only was the sole treatment category associated with decreased mortality. When adjusted for demographics, clinical characteristics, and all treatment combinations there was an absolute decrease in the mortality rate by 2.5% between early and late periods of the study. However, when including an additional control for changes in unmeasured variables overtime, the absolute mortality rate decreased by 5.4%.
This study found that anticoagulation was the most significant treatment for the reduction of COVID-related mortality. Anticoagulation Only was the sole treatment category associated with a significant decrease in mortality for both intensive care and non-intensive care patients. Treatment combinations that additionally included corticosteroids and/or remdesivir were also associated with decreased mortality, though only in the non-intensive care stratum. Further, we found that factors other than measured changes in demographics, clinical characteristics or pharmacological interventions accounted for an additional decrease in the COVID-19-related mortality rate over time.
在新冠疫情的最初几个月里,美国与该疾病相关的死亡率有所下降。在此期间,随着新的和重新利用的治疗方法单独或联合使用,药物干预的护理标准不断演变。尽管这些药物已被单独研究,但关于不同药物组合的相对影响的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估与新冠相关的死亡率与观察到的药物组合之间的关联,并确定药物相关实践模式和测量的患者特征的变化是否单独解释了新冠疫情早期死亡率的下降。
在一个多医院医疗系统中进行了一项回顾性队列研究,探讨瑞德西韦、皮质类固醇、抗凝剂、托珠单抗和羟氯喹的组合与死亡率之间的关联。多变量逻辑回归用于确定总体人群以及按重症监护病房和非重症监护病房入院分层的人群的死亡率预测因素。创建了一个单独的模型来控制未测量变量随时间的变化。
对于所有患者,四种治疗组合与较低的死亡率相关:仅抗凝治疗(比值比0.24,p<0.0001)、抗凝与瑞德西韦联合治疗(比值比0.25,p = 0.0031)、抗凝与皮质类固醇联合治疗(比值比0.53,p = 0.0263)以及抗凝、皮质类固醇与瑞德西韦联合治疗(比值比0.42,p = 0.026)。对于非重症监护病房的患者,相同的组合与较低的死亡率显著相关。对于入住重症监护病房的患者,仅抗凝治疗是唯一与死亡率降低相关的治疗类别。在对人口统计学、临床特征和所有治疗组合进行调整后,研究早期和晚期之间的死亡率绝对下降了2.5%。然而,当纳入对未测量变量随时间变化的额外控制时,绝对死亡率下降了5.4%。
本研究发现抗凝治疗是降低新冠相关死亡率的最重要治疗方法。仅抗凝治疗是重症监护和非重症监护患者中唯一与死亡率显著降低相关的治疗类别。额外包括皮质类固醇和/或瑞德西韦的治疗组合也与死亡率降低相关,尽管仅在非重症监护层。此外,我们发现人口统计学、临床特征或药物干预的测量变化以外的因素随着时间的推移导致新冠相关死亡率进一步下降。