• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舍曲林每日治疗方案对美国重度抑郁障碍或强迫症患者的依从性、持续性和医疗资源利用的影响:来自真实世界证据的分析。

Impact of sertraline daily treatment regimen on adherence, persistence and healthcare resource utilisation in patients with major depressive disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder: A real-world evidence analysis from the United States.

机构信息

The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14522. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14522. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1111/ijcp.14522
PMID:34120397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8518919/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To generate real-world evidence (RWE) from the United States to assess the impact of pill burden and the importance of achieving a stable daily dose of sertraline (time taken, number of dose adjustments needed) on adherence/persistence and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the PharMetrics Plus database (1 October 2012 to 31 March 2020) in the United States. Eligible patients had major depressive disorder (MDD) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and ≥1 claim for sertraline during index period (1 April 2013 to 31 March 2019, allowing 6-months prior, 1-year post-index follow-up). Patients who achieved stable daily dose of sertraline (>90 days on same dose) were categorised into five cohorts, depending on pill burden/daily dose: Cohort (1): 1 × 50 mg/d; Cohort (2): 1 × 100 mg/d; Cohort (3): 2 × 50 mg/d; Cohort (4): 1.5 × 100 mg/d; Cohort (5): 3 × 50 mg/d. Impact of pill burden on adherence/persistence and HCRU was assessed among cohorts using logistic regression analysis, and between patients who did vs did not stabilise on therapy. P < .05 was considered significant for all analyses.

RESULTS

Of 224 412 eligible patients, 108 729 stabilised on sertraline (50, 100 or 150 mg/d) and formed Cohorts 1-5. Stabilised patients on lower pill burden had statistically higher adherence and were more likely to remain persistent throughout 1-year post-index period vs patients on higher pill burden but same overall dose (100 mg/d [Cohort 2 vs 3] and 150 mg/d [Cohort 4 vs 5], respectively). Patients who did not stabilise had significantly lower adherence/persistence vs patients who achieved stable daily dose (Cohorts 1-5 combined). Persistence improved when stable daily dose was achieved quickly (within 1-4 months) and efficiently (within 1-3 dose adjustments). Probability of HCRU increased for patients who did not stabilise on their initial prescription.

CONCLUSION

Simplifying treatment regimen and decreasing pill burden improved adherence and/or persistence with sertraline therapy (100 or 150 mg/d). Patients achieving stable daily dose of sertraline in an efficient and timely manner were more likely to remain persistent throughout 1-year follow-up.

摘要

目的

从美国生成真实世界证据(RWE),评估药物负担以及实现舍曲林稳定日剂量(服用时间、所需剂量调整次数)对依从性/持久性和医疗资源利用(HCRU)的重要性。

方法

在美国 PharMetrics Plus 数据库(2012 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日)中进行回顾性分析。合格患者患有重度抑郁症(MDD)或强迫症(OCD),并在指数期内(2013 年 4 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日)至少有一次舍曲林的用药记录,允许提前 6 个月,指数后 1 年随访。根据药物负担/日剂量,将达到舍曲林稳定日剂量(相同剂量服用>90 天)的患者分为五组:组(1):1×50mg/d;组(2):1×100mg/d;组(3):2×50mg/d;组(4):1.5×100mg/d;组(5):3×50mg/d。使用逻辑回归分析评估各组药物负担对依从性/持久性和 HCRU 的影响,并比较达到和未达到治疗稳定的患者。所有分析均以 P<.05 为有统计学意义。

结果

在 224412 名合格患者中,有 108729 名患者稳定服用舍曲林(50、100 或 150mg/d),并形成组 1-5。服用低药物负担的稳定患者在统计学上具有更高的依从性,并且在指数后 1 年期间更有可能保持持续治疗,而不是服用高药物负担但相同总剂量的患者(100mg/d[组 2 与 3]和 150mg/d[组 4 与 5])。与达到稳定日剂量的患者相比,未达到稳定的患者的依从性/持久性显著降低(组 1-5 合并)。如果快速(1-4 个月内)和高效(1-3 次剂量调整内)达到稳定日剂量,则可改善持久性。对于初始处方未稳定的患者,HCRU 的可能性增加。

结论

简化治疗方案和减少药物负担可提高舍曲林治疗(100 或 150mg/d)的依从性和/或持久性。以高效和及时的方式达到稳定的日剂量的患者更有可能在整个 1 年随访期间保持持续治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/5a2945301169/IJCP-75-e14522-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/1f20e0c4e6c9/IJCP-75-e14522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/6dd75b58afd5/IJCP-75-e14522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/1cf7e6a4246d/IJCP-75-e14522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/efd2eeaa1072/IJCP-75-e14522-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/5a2945301169/IJCP-75-e14522-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/1f20e0c4e6c9/IJCP-75-e14522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/6dd75b58afd5/IJCP-75-e14522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/1cf7e6a4246d/IJCP-75-e14522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/efd2eeaa1072/IJCP-75-e14522-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab94/8518919/5a2945301169/IJCP-75-e14522-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of sertraline daily treatment regimen on adherence, persistence and healthcare resource utilisation in patients with major depressive disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder: A real-world evidence analysis from the United States.舍曲林每日治疗方案对美国重度抑郁障碍或强迫症患者的依从性、持续性和医疗资源利用的影响:来自真实世界证据的分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14522. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14522. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
2
Adherence and Persistence Across Antidepressant Therapeutic Classes: A Retrospective Claims Analysis Among Insured US Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).抗抑郁药治疗类别中的依从性和持久性:美国有重大抑郁障碍(MDD)保险的患者回顾性理赔分析。
CNS Drugs. 2017 May;31(5):421-432. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0417-0.
3
Impact of adherence to antidepressants on healthcare outcomes and costs among patients with type 2 diabetes and comorbid major depressive disorder.2型糖尿病合并重度抑郁症患者对抗抑郁药的依从性对医疗结局和成本的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1879-1889. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1347092. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
Adherence and persistence among patients with major depressive disorder enrolled in the vortioxetine tAccess Patient Support Program.参加文拉法辛患者援助计划的重性抑郁障碍患者的依从性和持久性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Aug;37(8):1385-1392. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1918072. Epub 2021 May 18.
5
Comparison of amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide single pill combination and free combination: adherence, persistence, healthcare utilization and costs.氨氯地平/缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪单片复方制剂与自由联合用药的比较:依从性、持续性、医疗保健利用及成本
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Dec;31(12):2287-96. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1098598. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
6
A medication adherence and persistence comparison of hypertensive patients treated with single-, double- and triple-pill combination therapy.单药、双联和三联复方疗法治疗高血压患者的药物依从性和持续性比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2415-22. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.964853. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
7
Comparison of real-world adherence, healthcare resource utilization and costs for newly initiated valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination versus angiotensin receptor blocker/calcium channel blocker free-combination therapy.比较新起始缬沙坦/氨氯地平单片复方与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/钙通道阻滞剂自由联合治疗的真实世界依从性、医疗资源利用和成本。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):576-83. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.596873. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
8
Economic burden associated with inadequate antidepressant medication management among patients with depression and known cardiovascular diseases: insights from a United States-based retrospective claims database analysis.与已知心血管疾病的抑郁症患者中抗抑郁药物管理不足相关的经济负担:来自美国基于回顾性索赔数据库分析的见解。
J Med Econ. 2020 Mar;23(3):262-270. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1686311. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
9
Drug concentration monitoring with tolerability and efficacy assessments during open-label, long-term sertraline treatment of children and adolescents.在舍曲林对儿童和青少年进行开放标签长期治疗期间进行药物浓度监测并评估耐受性和疗效。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2006 Feb-Apr;16(1-2):117-29. doi: 10.1089/cap.2006.16.117.
10
Does a single-pill antihypertensive/lipid-lowering regimen improve adherence in US managed care enrolees? A non-randomized, observational, retrospective study.单一片剂降压/降脂方案是否能提高美国管理式医疗参保者的依从性?一项非随机、观察性、回顾性研究。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(3):193-202. doi: 10.2165/11530680-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Types of Medication Non-adherence & Approaches to Enhance Medication Adherence in Mental Health Disorders: A Narrative Review.精神疾病中药物治疗不依从的类型及提高药物治疗依从性的方法:一项叙述性综述
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Nov;46(6):503-510. doi: 10.1177/02537176241233745. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
2
[Treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorders].[难治性强迫症]
Nervenarzt. 2024 May;95(5):432-439. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01629-1. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Women Are at Greater Risk of OCD Than Men: A Meta-Analytic Review of OCD Prevalence Worldwide.女性患强迫症的风险高于男性:全球强迫症患病率的荟萃分析综述。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 23;81(4):19r13085. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19r13085.
2
Trends in depression among Adults in the United States, NHANES 2005-2016.美国成年人抑郁症趋势研究,NHANES2005-2016。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:609-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.036. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Causes of drug discontinuation in patients with major depressive disorder in China.
中国重度抑郁症患者停药的原因。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;96:109755. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109755. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
4
Obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Aug 1;5(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0102-3.
5
Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study.中国精神障碍的患病率:一项横断面流行病学研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;6(3):211-224. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30511-X. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
6
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家层面 195 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2017 年 354 种疾病和伤害导致的发病率、患病率和伤残损失寿命年:基于 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
A systematic review of measures of medication adherence in consumers with unipolar depression.一项针对单相抑郁消费者用药依从性测量的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jan;15(1):3-22. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Association of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder With Objective Indicators of Educational Attainment: A Nationwide Register-Based Sibling Control Study.强迫症与教育程度客观指标的关联:一项基于全国登记数据的同胞对照研究。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):47-55. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3523.
9
Barriers and facilitators of adherence to antidepressants among outpatients with major depressive disorder: A qualitative study.重度抑郁症门诊患者对抗抑郁药物依从性的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 14;12(6):e0179290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179290. eCollection 2017.
10
Pharmacological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders: summary of WFSBP guidelines.单相抑郁障碍的药物治疗:WFSBP 指南摘要。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;21(3):166-176. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2017.1306082. Epub 2017 Apr 3.