The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China.
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14522. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14522. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
To generate real-world evidence (RWE) from the United States to assess the impact of pill burden and the importance of achieving a stable daily dose of sertraline (time taken, number of dose adjustments needed) on adherence/persistence and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU).
Retrospective analysis of the PharMetrics Plus database (1 October 2012 to 31 March 2020) in the United States. Eligible patients had major depressive disorder (MDD) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and ≥1 claim for sertraline during index period (1 April 2013 to 31 March 2019, allowing 6-months prior, 1-year post-index follow-up). Patients who achieved stable daily dose of sertraline (>90 days on same dose) were categorised into five cohorts, depending on pill burden/daily dose: Cohort (1): 1 × 50 mg/d; Cohort (2): 1 × 100 mg/d; Cohort (3): 2 × 50 mg/d; Cohort (4): 1.5 × 100 mg/d; Cohort (5): 3 × 50 mg/d. Impact of pill burden on adherence/persistence and HCRU was assessed among cohorts using logistic regression analysis, and between patients who did vs did not stabilise on therapy. P < .05 was considered significant for all analyses.
Of 224 412 eligible patients, 108 729 stabilised on sertraline (50, 100 or 150 mg/d) and formed Cohorts 1-5. Stabilised patients on lower pill burden had statistically higher adherence and were more likely to remain persistent throughout 1-year post-index period vs patients on higher pill burden but same overall dose (100 mg/d [Cohort 2 vs 3] and 150 mg/d [Cohort 4 vs 5], respectively). Patients who did not stabilise had significantly lower adherence/persistence vs patients who achieved stable daily dose (Cohorts 1-5 combined). Persistence improved when stable daily dose was achieved quickly (within 1-4 months) and efficiently (within 1-3 dose adjustments). Probability of HCRU increased for patients who did not stabilise on their initial prescription.
Simplifying treatment regimen and decreasing pill burden improved adherence and/or persistence with sertraline therapy (100 or 150 mg/d). Patients achieving stable daily dose of sertraline in an efficient and timely manner were more likely to remain persistent throughout 1-year follow-up.
从美国生成真实世界证据(RWE),评估药物负担以及实现舍曲林稳定日剂量(服用时间、所需剂量调整次数)对依从性/持久性和医疗资源利用(HCRU)的重要性。
在美国 PharMetrics Plus 数据库(2012 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日)中进行回顾性分析。合格患者患有重度抑郁症(MDD)或强迫症(OCD),并在指数期内(2013 年 4 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日)至少有一次舍曲林的用药记录,允许提前 6 个月,指数后 1 年随访。根据药物负担/日剂量,将达到舍曲林稳定日剂量(相同剂量服用>90 天)的患者分为五组:组(1):1×50mg/d;组(2):1×100mg/d;组(3):2×50mg/d;组(4):1.5×100mg/d;组(5):3×50mg/d。使用逻辑回归分析评估各组药物负担对依从性/持久性和 HCRU 的影响,并比较达到和未达到治疗稳定的患者。所有分析均以 P<.05 为有统计学意义。
在 224412 名合格患者中,有 108729 名患者稳定服用舍曲林(50、100 或 150mg/d),并形成组 1-5。服用低药物负担的稳定患者在统计学上具有更高的依从性,并且在指数后 1 年期间更有可能保持持续治疗,而不是服用高药物负担但相同总剂量的患者(100mg/d[组 2 与 3]和 150mg/d[组 4 与 5])。与达到稳定日剂量的患者相比,未达到稳定的患者的依从性/持久性显著降低(组 1-5 合并)。如果快速(1-4 个月内)和高效(1-3 次剂量调整内)达到稳定日剂量,则可改善持久性。对于初始处方未稳定的患者,HCRU 的可能性增加。
简化治疗方案和减少药物负担可提高舍曲林治疗(100 或 150mg/d)的依从性和/或持久性。以高效和及时的方式达到稳定的日剂量的患者更有可能在整个 1 年随访期间保持持续治疗。