Suppr超能文献

颗粒增强免疫比浊法(PEIT)与高效液相色谱法(HPLC)用于糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)分析的方法比较。

Method comparison of Particle Enhanced Immunoturbidimetry (PEIT) with High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) analysis.

作者信息

Dildar Shabnam, Imran Sheharbano, Naz Farah

机构信息

Department of Chemical Pathology, National Institute of Bloood Diseases and Bone Marrow Transplanataion, Karachi, Pakistan.

Section of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Fatima Memorial Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jun 13;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40842-021-00123-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) technique is considered as a gold standard for HbA1c analysis however all laboratories cannot adopt it due to certain limitations. Our aim was to compare Particle Enhanced Immunoturbidimetry (PEIT) method with High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for HbA1c analysis.

METHOD

All blood samples were analyzed by HPLC assay on a Bio-Rad D-10 analyzer and PEIT on an Erba XL-200 analyzer. Precision studies were undertaken and Coefficient of Variation (%CV) calculated. Systemic Error (SE), Random Error (RE) and Total Error (TE) were obtained. The Total Allowable Error (TEa) set by the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) for HbA1c is 6%.The acceptable evaluation method is where TE is less than TE RESULTS: The Precision studies were satisfactory with Coefficient of Variation (%CV) being less than 4% for both techniques. Mean HbA1c levels were slightly higher from HPLC than PEIT 9.07 ± 2.23% and 8.93 ± 2.10% respectively, although the difference was minimal. RE was 1.41%, TE was 1.55%, which was less than TEa set by the NGSP. Both methods strongly correlated with the correlation coefficient (r) 0.9716, p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed HbA1c analysis by PEIT technique is precise, accurate, rapid and convenient and can be employed as an alternative to HPLC technique in countries where cost is a major problem for diagnosis and treatment.

摘要

背景与目的

高效液相色谱法(HPLC)被认为是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)分析的金标准,但由于某些局限性,并非所有实验室都能采用该方法。我们的目的是比较颗粒增强免疫比浊法(PEIT)与高效液相色谱法(HPLC)用于HbA1c分析的效果。

方法

所有血样均在伯乐D - 10分析仪上采用HPLC法进行分析,并在埃尔巴XL - 200分析仪上采用PEIT法进行分析。进行精密度研究并计算变异系数(%CV)。获得系统误差(SE)、随机误差(RE)和总误差(TE)。国家糖化血红蛋白标准化计划(NGSP)为HbA1c设定的总允许误差(TEa)为6%。可接受的评估方法是TE小于TEa。

结果

精密度研究结果令人满意,两种技术的变异系数(%CV)均小于4%。HPLC法测得的平均HbA1c水平略高于PEIT法,分别为9.07±2.23%和8.93±2.10%,尽管差异极小。RE为1.41%,TE为1.55%,均小于NGSP设定的TEa。两种方法的相关性很强,相关系数(r)为0.9716,p < 0.0001。

结论

我们的研究表明,在诊断和治疗成本是主要问题的国家,采用PEIT技术进行HbA1c分析精确、准确、快速且方便,可作为HPLC技术的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e26/8201666/a95113345d87/40842_2021_123_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验