Suppr超能文献

连续切除治疗非黑色素瘤皮肤癌。

Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer.

作者信息

Dekker Paige K, Mishu Mark D, Youn Richard, Baker Stephen B

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.

Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jun 10;9(6):e3607. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003607. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has become the predominant modality of excision for non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Patients are referred for MMS under the assumption that it is the most effective procedure for definitive removal of the cancer while also allowing for maximal tissue preservation to achieve optimal cosmesis. The objective of this study was to investigate outcomes of serial excision (SE) as an alternative excision modality for NMSC.

METHODS

Patients undergoing SE for basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma by the senior author from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, and excision characteristics were recorded. The primary outcome was the number of excisions required to achieve negative margins.

RESULTS

In total, 129 patients with 205 NMSC lesions were retrospectively reviewed. An estimated 69 lesions (33.7%) were located in high risk areas, as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Negative margins were achieved in 191 (93.2%) lesions. In 88.3% of lesions (n = 181/205), negative margins were achieved in 2 or less excisions. 12 lesions (5.9%) were referred for MMS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that SE is an effective modality for definitive removal of NMSC. Recent research reveals that SE is much less expensive than MMS, and therefore places a smaller financial burden on the patient and the healthcare system as a whole. Relative to MMS, SE offers similar if not increased benefits for lower cost. Our findings highlight the need to critically reassess the select indications for MMS.

摘要

未标注

莫氏显微外科手术(MMS)已成为非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)切除的主要方式。患者被转诊接受MMS手术,是基于这样一种假设,即它是彻底切除癌症的最有效方法,同时还能最大程度地保留组织以实现最佳的美容效果。本研究的目的是调查连续切除(SE)作为NMSC的另一种切除方式的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2009年至2020年由资深作者进行的基底细胞癌或鳞状细胞癌SE手术患者。记录患者的人口统计学特征、病变特征和切除特征。主要结局是实现切缘阴性所需的切除次数。

结果

总共回顾性分析了129例患者的205个NMSC病变。根据美国国立综合癌症网络的定义,估计69个病变(33.7%)位于高危区域。191个(93.2%)病变实现了切缘阴性。在88.3%的病变(n = 181/205)中,2次或更少的切除实现了切缘阴性。12个病变(5.9%)被转诊接受MMS手术。

结论

我们的结果表明,SE是彻底切除NMSC的有效方式。最近的研究表明,SE比MMS便宜得多,因此对患者和整个医疗系统的经济负担较小。相对于MMS,SE以更低的成本提供了相似甚至更多的益处。我们的研究结果强调了对MMS的选择适应证进行严格重新评估的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7e/8191689/4c6e4fc9fa78/gox-9-e3607-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验