• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
From the Inside Out: Gender Mainstreaming and Organizational Culture Within the Aid Sector.由内而外:援助部门中的性别主流化与组织文化
Front Sociol. 2021 May 28;6:664406. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.664406. eCollection 2021.
2
Beyond gender mainstreaming: transforming humanitarian action, organizations and culture.超越性别主流化:转变人道主义行动、组织与文化。
J Int Humanit Action. 2023;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41018-023-00138-1. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
3
Evaluation of the partnership between international non-governmental organizations and the State in the health sector in Mozambique.评价国际非政府组织与莫桑比克卫生部门国家之间的伙伴关系。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jun 1;39:91. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.91.25970. eCollection 2021.
4
Institutional gender mainstreaming in health in UN Agencies: Promising strategies and ongoing challenges.联合国机构中的卫生领域体制性别主流化:有希望的战略和持续存在的挑战。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Aug;17(8):1551-1563. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1941183. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
5
Gender mainstreaming practice: considerations for HIV/AIDS community organisations.将性别观点纳入主流的实践:对艾滋病毒/艾滋病社区组织的考量
AIDS Care. 2010;22 Suppl 2:1613-9. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.525611.
6
International non-governmental organizations' provision of community-based tuberculosis care for hard-to-reach populations in Myanmar, 2013-2014.2013 - 2014年国际非政府组织为缅甸难以接触到的人群提供基于社区的结核病护理服务
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Mar 24;6(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0285-3.
7
Engendering the bureaucracy? Challenges and opportunities for mainstreaming gender in Ministries of Health under sector-wide approaches.催生官僚机构?在全部门办法下将性别问题纳入卫生部主流的挑战与机遇。
Health Policy Plan. 2005 May;20(3):141-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czi019.
8
Predators among protectors: overcoming power abuse during humanitarian crisis through effective humanitarian diplomacy and a gender-transformative approach.保护者中的掠夺者:通过有效的人道主义外交和性别变革方法克服人道主义危机期间的权力滥用。
AIMS Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;8(2):196-205. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021015. eCollection 2021.
9
Intersectionality and gender mainstreaming in international health: using a feminist participatory action research process to analyse voices and debates from the global south and north.国际健康中的交叉性和性别主流化:运用女性主义参与式行动研究过程来分析来自全球南方和北方的声音和辩论。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(11):1825-32. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.025. Epub 2011 Sep 24.
10
Me too! A case study of gendered victimization and feminist development in a Swedish peer support organization for people with experiences of criminalization and substance abuse.我也是!瑞典一个为有被定罪和药物滥用经历的人提供同伴支持的组织中性别化受害与女权主义发展的案例研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 2;13:937228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.937228. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender mainstreaming at 25 years: Toward an inclusive, collaborative, and structured research agenda.25 年的性别主流化:迈向包容性、协作性和结构化的研究议程。
J Glob Health. 2024 Jan 26;14:04011. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04011.
2
Beyond gender mainstreaming: transforming humanitarian action, organizations and culture.超越性别主流化:转变人道主义行动、组织与文化。
J Int Humanit Action. 2023;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41018-023-00138-1. Epub 2023 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender-transformative programmes: implications for research and action.性别变革型项目:对研究与行动的影响
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e159-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30528-5. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
2
Trouble in Paradigm: "Gender Transformative" Programming in Violence Prevention.范式困境:预防暴力中的“性别变革性”项目规划
Violence Against Women. 2019 Nov;25(14):1635-1656. doi: 10.1177/1077801219872551.
3
Intersectionality at Work: South Asian Muslim Women's Experiences of Employment and Leadership in the United Kingdom.工作中的交叉性:英国南亚穆斯林女性的就业与领导经历
Sex Roles. 2017;77(7):510-522. doi: 10.1007/s11199-017-0741-3. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
4
Taking on the gender challenge in organisations: what does it take?应对组织中的性别挑战:需要具备什么条件?
Glob Public Health. 2017 Jul;12(7):846-857. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1094110. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

由内而外:援助部门中的性别主流化与组织文化

From the Inside Out: Gender Mainstreaming and Organizational Culture Within the Aid Sector.

作者信息

Lokot Michelle

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2021 May 28;6:664406. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.664406. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2021.664406
PMID:34124231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8193981/
Abstract

Many international non-government organizations (INGOs) implement interventions designed to promote gender equality, investing significant resources into embedding gender considerations into programmes through the strategy of gender mainstreaming. However, despite their altruistic mission, INGOs place less focus on addressing culture and power hierarchies within their organizations. This article suggests that many INGOs fail to walk the talk on gender equality. Through an analysis of recent challenges facing the development and humanitarian aid sector, including gaps in safeguarding and #AidToo, this paper emphasizes the importance of addressing gender equality from the inside out. It draws on feminist perspectives, the notion of the "deep structure" of organizations and the author's own experiences to argue for the need to address gendered, racial and colonial power hierarchies within the organizational culture of INGOs. The article argues that it is no longer sufficient to reduce gender mainstreaming and inclusion to programming interventions, and that INGOs need to reflexively and intentionally tackle power and inequalities within their own culture and structures.

摘要

许多国际非政府组织(INGO)实施旨在促进性别平等的干预措施,通过性别主流化战略投入大量资源,将性别因素纳入项目中。然而,尽管它们有着利他主义使命,但INGO较少关注解决其组织内部的文化和权力等级制度。本文指出,许多INGO在性别平等方面言行不一。通过分析发展和人道主义援助部门近期面临的挑战,包括保障方面的差距和“援助也有问题”,本文强调从内部解决性别平等问题的重要性。它借鉴了女权主义观点、组织“深层结构”的概念以及作者自身的经验,主张有必要在INGO的组织文化中解决性别化、种族化和殖民权力等级制度问题。文章认为,仅将性别主流化和包容性简化为项目干预措施已不再足够,INGO需要反思并有意应对其自身文化和结构中的权力及不平等问题。