• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高级沟通技巧工作坊:使用标准化病人对高年级医学生进行教学。

An Advanced Communication Skills Workshop Using Standardized Patients for Senior Medical Students.

机构信息

Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, and Director of Clinical Skills, Yale School of Medicine.

Professor, Department of Medicine, and Director of Communication Skills Education, Yale School of Medicine.

出版信息

MedEdPORTAL. 2021 May 27;17:11163. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11163.

DOI:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11163
PMID:34124349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8155077/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medical students often lack training in advanced communication skills encompassing emotionally fraught situations and those in which an intense emotional response is expected. Such skills are required for clinical situations encountered during residency. We created and evaluated an advanced communication skills workshop (ACSW) using standardized patients for senior medical students. The workshop emphasized communication skills for four scenarios-strong emotion, goals of care, medical error, and palliative care assessment-and utilized formative peer assessment and feedback.

METHODS

We created the four ACSW cases with case-specific communication behavior checklists and a common modified Master Interview Rating Scale in a Capstone Course for senior medical students. In groups of three, students rotated through three of four stations. Each student conducted one of the interviews while the other two completed the checklists and provided verbal feedback. We performed one-way analyses of variance on Likert responses and content analysis on open responses on a post-ACSW survey.

RESULTS

Ninety-one students completed the ACSW and survey. Students assigned high value to all four ACSW student roles: interviewer, observer, feedback recipient, and feedback provider. Students rated the experience above average to excellent on nearly all survey items. Open-response themes included "liked the opportunity to give or receive peer feedback" (46%) and "found the checklists helpful" (45%).

DISCUSSION

Feasible and well received by senior medical students, our ACSW offers an opportunity to practice and observe advanced communication skills and peer feedback. A peer-assisted, formative learning model, the ACSW efficiently addresses a key aspect of residency preparation.

摘要

简介

医学生通常缺乏高级沟通技巧的培训,这些技巧包括涉及情绪激动的情况和需要强烈情感反应的情况。这些技能是在住院医师期间遇到的临床情况所需要的。我们为高年级医学生创建并评估了一个使用标准化患者的高级沟通技巧研讨会(ACSW)。该研讨会强调了针对四种情况的沟通技巧 - 强烈的情绪、治疗目标、医疗错误和姑息治疗评估 - 并利用形成性同伴评估和反馈。

方法

我们在高年级医学生的顶峰课程中使用特定案例的沟通行为清单和共同的修改后的主访谈评分量表创建了四个 ACSW 案例。学生三人一组轮流进行四个站中的三个。每个学生进行一次访谈,而另外两个学生完成清单并提供口头反馈。我们对 ACSW 后的调查中的李克特反应进行单向方差分析,并对开放反应进行内容分析。

结果

91 名学生完成了 ACSW 和调查。学生对所有四个 ACSW 学生角色都给予了高度评价:访谈者、观察员、反馈接受者和反馈提供者。学生几乎对所有调查项目的评价都高于平均水平到优秀。开放反应的主题包括“喜欢给予或接受同伴反馈的机会”(46%)和“发现清单很有帮助”(45%)。

讨论

对于高年级医学生来说,我们的 ACSW 是可行的,并且受到了欢迎,它为练习和观察高级沟通技巧和同伴反馈提供了机会。ACSW 是一种同伴辅助的、形成性的学习模式,有效地解决了住院医师准备的一个关键方面。

相似文献

1
An Advanced Communication Skills Workshop Using Standardized Patients for Senior Medical Students.高级沟通技巧工作坊:使用标准化病人对高年级医学生进行教学。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 May 27;17:11163. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11163.
2
Assessing Advanced Communication Skills via Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Comparison of Faculty Versus Self, Peer, and Standardized Patient Assessors.通过客观结构化临床考试评估高级沟通技巧:教师与自我、同伴和标准化患者评估者的比较。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):294-307. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1704763. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
An advanced communication skills course for fourth-year, post-clerkship students.面向四年级临床实习后学生的高级沟通技巧课程。
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1165-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00033.
4
'Thinking on my feet': an improvisation course to enhance students' confidence and responsiveness in the medical interview.“随机应变”:一门提升学生在医学面试中自信心与反应能力的即兴课程。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493466.
5
Early assessment of medical students' clinical skills.医学生临床技能的早期评估。
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1156. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00020.
6
Integrating 360° behavior-orientated feedback in communication skills training for medical undergraduates: concept, acceptance and students' self-ratings of communication competence.将360°行为导向反馈整合到医学本科生沟通技能培训中:概念、接受度及学生对沟通能力的自我评估
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0792-0.
7
A communication assessment and skill-building exercise (CASE) for first-year residents.针对一年级住院医师的沟通评估与技能培养练习(CASE)。
Acad Med. 2002 Jul;77(7):746-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00035.
8
Effects of longitudinal small-group learning on delivery and receipt of communication skills feedback.纵向小组学习对沟通技巧反馈的提供和接收的影响。
Med Educ. 2013 Nov;47(11):1073-9. doi: 10.1111/medu.12246.
9
The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile.形成性客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)期间的反馈质量取决于带教老师的个人情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0815-x.
10
Communication skills training in surgical residency: a needs assessment and metacognition analysis of a difficult conversation objective structured clinical examination.外科住院医师培训中的沟通技能培训:对困难对话客观结构化临床考试的需求评估与元认知分析
J Surg Educ. 2014 May-Jun;71(3):309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.020. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Anger De-escalation: A Standardized Patient Workshop for Third- and Fourth-Year Medical Students.愤怒情绪缓和:面向三、四年级医学生的标准化病人工作坊
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Mar 11;21:11504. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11504. eCollection 2025.
2
Values and Uncertainty at End of Life: A Standardized Patient Case for Preclinical Medical Students.临终时的价值观与不确定性:面向临床前医学生的标准化患者案例
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Mar 4;21:11503. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11503. eCollection 2025.
3
Integration of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine Into a Medical Student Clinical Reasoning Curriculum.将老年医学和姑息医学融入医学生临床推理课程
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Feb 6;21:11495. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11495. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparison of a Virtual and in-Person OSCE on Advanced Communication Skills: Qualitative Insights from Medical Student Debrief Transcripts.虚拟与现场客观结构化临床考试在高级沟通技能方面的比较:来自医学生汇报记录的定性见解
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Jan 17;12:23821205241311961. doi: 10.1177/23821205241311961. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Explicit Training in Systematic Communication Strategies: A Pilot Study Exploring the Incorporation of Communication Tools by First-Year Residents in Simulation and in Clinical Practice.系统沟通策略的明确培训:一项探索一年级住院医师在模拟和临床实践中使用沟通工具的试点研究。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 May 16;11:23821205241256042. doi: 10.1177/23821205241256042. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
A Comparison Between In-Person and Virtual Communication Skills OSCE for Medical Students.医学生面对面与虚拟沟通技能客观结构化临床考试的比较
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Mar 25;11:23821205241241375. doi: 10.1177/23821205241241375. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
Video tools in pediatric goals of care communication: A systematic review.儿科照护目标沟通中的视频工具:一项系统评价
PEC Innov. 2022 Mar 26;1:100029. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100029. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Medical students' experiences of working with simulated patients in challenging communication training.医学生在具有挑战性的沟通训练中与模拟患者合作的经历。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Oct 10;7(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00230-3.
9
I Don't Have a Diagnosis for You: Preparing Medical Students to Communicate Diagnostic Uncertainty in the Emergency Department.我无法为你做出诊断:在急诊室培养医学生沟通诊断不确定性的能力。
MedEdPORTAL. 2022 Feb 4;18:11218. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11218. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Child Neurology Residents' Communication Skills Through Objective Structured Clinical Exams.通过客观结构化临床考试提高儿童神经科住院医师的沟通技巧。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Mar 4;17:11120. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11120.
2
Assessing Advanced Communication Skills via Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Comparison of Faculty Versus Self, Peer, and Standardized Patient Assessors.通过客观结构化临床考试评估高级沟通技巧:教师与自我、同伴和标准化患者评估者的比较。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):294-307. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1704763. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study.同伴评估在形成性反馈的客观结构化临床考试中的效果:初步研究。
Korean J Med Educ. 2020 Mar;32(1):59-65. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2020.153. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
4
Delivering Challenging News: An Illness-Trajectory Communication Curriculum for Multispecialty Oncology Residents and Fellows.传达具有挑战性的消息:针对多专科肿瘤学住院医师和研究员的疾病轨迹沟通课程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Apr 24;15:10819. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10819.
5
Twelve tips for running an effective session with standardized patients.与标准化病人有效互动的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2020 Jun;42(6):622-627. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1607969. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
6
Advanced Patient-Centered Communication for Health Behavior Change: Motivational Interviewing Workshops for Medical Learners.以患者为中心的健康行为改变高级沟通:面向医学学习者的动机性访谈工作坊
MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Sep 16;12:10455. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10455.
7
Four-Station Group Observed Structured Clinical Encounter for Formative Assessment of Communication Skills for Internal Medicine Clerks.用于内科实习医生沟通技能形成性评估的四站式小组观察结构化临床问诊
MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Aug 26;12:10444. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10444.
8
Transgender Health: A Standardized Patient Case for Advanced Clerkship Students.跨性别健康:面向高级见习医学生的标准化患者案例
MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Dec 23;12:10518. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10518.
9
Breaking Bad News: A Small-Group Learning Module and Simulated Patient Case for Preclerkship Students.告知坏消息:针对临床实习前学生的小组学习模块及模拟患者案例
MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Nov 22;12:10505. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10505.
10
A Difficult Patient Encounter: Using a Standardized Patient Scenario to Teach Medical Students to Treat Medication-Seeking Patients.一次艰难的医患接触:运用标准化病人场景教学医学生如何治疗寻求药物的患者。
MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Aug 4;13:10612. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10612.