• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省一家三级医疗公立部门医院在“2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行”期间的数字射线照相拒收分析。

Digital radiograph rejection analysis during "Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic" in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.

作者信息

Ali Amir, Yaseen Muhammad

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Lady Reading Hospital (Medical Teaching Institute) Peshawar, Soekarno Rd, PTCL Colony, Peshawar, 25000 Pakistan.

出版信息

Chin J Acad Radiol. 2021;4(2):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6
PMID:34124580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8181538/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of X-ray reject analysis is an important quality parameter in diagnostic facility. The aim of this study was to find out the radiograph rejection and its causes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemics as there was fear of coronavirus disease infection among the technical staff from the incoming patients in a busy, high volume public sector tertiary care hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This descriptive study was conducted at Radiology Department, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from August to November, 2020. The rejected radiographs and their causes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 15,000 X-ray procedures were conducted during study period out of which 2550 cases were repeated making the total rejection 17%. Rejection in male and female were 74.3 and 25.7%, respectively, while rejection in adults was (80.1%) and (19.9%) in pediatric age group of the total rejection. The main cause of rejection was positioning (30.5%) followed by artifacts (22.4%), motion (12.1%), improper collimation (10%), wrong labeling (8.4%), exposure errors (6.9%), detector errors (3.7%), machine faults (2.8%), re-request from referring physician (1.7%), and PACS issues (1.5%). In terms of body anatomical parts, the highest rejection was observed in extremities (44.1%), followed by chest radiography (23.3%), spine (11.4%), abdomen (6.4%), skull (5.9%), pelvis (4.7%), KUB (3.7%), and neck (0.6%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiograph rejection is common problem in every diagnostic facility but significant reduction can be achieved by implementing rejection analysis as basic quality indicator, and conducting technologist/s specific training programs for their knowledge and skill enhancement.

摘要

背景

X线片拒收分析评估是诊断机构中的一项重要质量参数。本研究的目的是查明2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的X线片拒收情况及其原因,因为在一家繁忙、高流量的公立三级护理医院中,技术人员担心会被前来就诊的患者感染冠状病毒病。

材料与方法

本描述性研究于2020年8月至11月在白沙瓦市雷丁夫人医院放射科进行。对被拒收的X线片及其原因进行了分析。

结果

在研究期间共进行了15000例X线检查,其中2550例被重复检查,总拒收率为17%。男性和女性的拒收率分别为74.3%和25.7%,而在所有被拒收的病例中,成人的拒收率为80.1%,儿童年龄组的拒收率为19.9%。拒收的主要原因是体位(30.5%),其次是伪影(22.4%)、移动(12.1%)、准直不当(10%)、标记错误(8.4%)、曝光错误(6.9%)、探测器错误(3.7%)、机器故障(2.8%)、转诊医生再次要求检查(1.7%)以及PACS问题(1.5%)。就身体解剖部位而言,四肢的拒收率最高(44.1%),其次是胸部X线摄影(23.3%)、脊柱(11.4%)、腹部(6.4%)、颅骨(5.9%)、骨盆(4.7%)、腹部平片(3.7%)和颈部(0.6%)。

结论

X线片拒收是每个诊断机构都存在的常见问题,但通过将拒收分析作为基本质量指标实施,并开展针对技术人员的特定培训项目以提高他们的知识和技能,可以显著降低拒收率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/da2f27ef546d/42058_2021_70_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/995274a0d67f/42058_2021_70_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/4d9500b752c4/42058_2021_70_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/06cfdda4a173/42058_2021_70_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/c08856fc0e7b/42058_2021_70_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/da2f27ef546d/42058_2021_70_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/995274a0d67f/42058_2021_70_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/4d9500b752c4/42058_2021_70_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/06cfdda4a173/42058_2021_70_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/c08856fc0e7b/42058_2021_70_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f2/8181538/da2f27ef546d/42058_2021_70_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital radiograph rejection analysis during "Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic" in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省一家三级医疗公立部门医院在“2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行”期间的数字射线照相拒收分析。
Chin J Acad Radiol. 2021;4(2):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Direct digital radiograph. Technicians role in obtaining good images.直接数字化X线摄影。技师在获取优质影像中的作用。
Saudi Med J. 2014 Aug;35(8):879-81.
3
Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students' attitude in Iran.数字放射摄影中的拒收分析:伊朗放射技师和学生态度的本地研究。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 May 29;33:49. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.49. eCollection 2019.
4
An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.对放射科拒收的重复X光片进行审核,作为质量保证的一项内容。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2008 Dec;11(4):355-8.
5
Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.直接数字化X线摄影中的拒收分析
Acta Radiol. 2012 Mar 1;53(2):174-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110350. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
6
Digital radiography reject analysis: A comparison between two radiology departments in New Zealand.数字化 X 光摄影 reject 分析:新西兰两个放射科部门的比较。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2023 Jun;70(2):137-144. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.654. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
7
Digital radiography reject analysis: data collection methodology, results, and recommendations from an in-depth investigation at two hospitals.数字放射摄影拒收分析:两家医院深入调查的数据收集方法、结果及建议
J Digit Imaging. 2009 Mar;22(1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9112-5. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
8
Analysis of film reject rate in the diagnostic x-ray facility of a tertiary health institution in Benin, Nigeria.尼日利亚贝宁一家三级医疗机构诊断性X射线设备的胶片拒收率分析。
Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2013 Jan-Mar;23(1):54-7.
9
Identification and effects of common errors and artifacts on the perceived quality of radiographs.常见错误和伪影对X线片感知质量的识别及影响
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014 Apr 15;244(8):961-7. doi: 10.2460/javma.244.8.961.
10
Image reject analysis and rejection causes in digital radiography at a university hospital through estimates of patient doses.通过估计患者剂量对某大学医院数字 X 射线摄影中的图像剔除分析和剔除原因进行分析。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2024 Mar 2;200(3):274-284. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncad301.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing patient safety through radiograph rejection analysis: Insights from a diagnostic imaging department audit.通过X光片拒收分析提高患者安全:来自诊断影像科审计的见解
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2052-2059. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.11441.
2
Evaluation of X-ray Beam Collimation in Adult Chest Radiography.成人胸部X线摄影中X线束准直的评估
Cureus. 2024 Sep 2;16(9):e68489. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68489. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Development of Acceptable Quality Dose (AQD) and image quality-related diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography investigations in a tertiary care public sector hospital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis and Economic Implication of X-Ray Film Reject in Diagnostic Radiology Department of Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部吉马大学专科医院放射诊断科X线片拒收情况分析及其经济影响
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017 Jul;27(4):421-426. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v27i4.13.
2
Ongoing quality control in digital radiography: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 151.数字放射成像中的持续质量控制:美国医学物理师协会成像物理委员会任务组151报告
Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6658-70. doi: 10.1118/1.4932623.
3
Image rejects in general direct digital radiography.
建立可接受质量剂量(AQD)和与图像质量相关的诊断参考水平,用于巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省一家三级保健公立医院的常见 CT 检查。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Dec;42(12):1479-1492. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01627-y. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
4
Multi-centre digital radiography reject analysis for different clinical room use types: The establishment of local reject reference levels for public hospital departments.多中心数字化 X 射线摄影不同临床用房使用类型的 reject 分析:公立医院科室建立本地 reject 参考水平。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Sep;71(3):412-420. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.796. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Suboptimal Chest Radiography and Artificial Intelligence: The Problem and the Solution.欠佳的胸部X光检查与人工智能:问题与解决方案
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;13(3):412. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030412.
6
Digital radiography reject analysis: A comparison between two radiology departments in New Zealand.数字化 X 光摄影 reject 分析:新西兰两个放射科部门的比较。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2023 Jun;70(2):137-144. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.654. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
直接数字化X线摄影中的图像伪影。
Acta Radiol Open. 2015 Oct 8;4(10):2058460115604339. doi: 10.1177/2058460115604339. eCollection 2015 Oct.
4
Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.直接数字化X线摄影中的拒收分析
Acta Radiol. 2012 Mar 1;53(2):174-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110350. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
5
Image rejects/retakes--radiographic challenges.图像拒收/重拍——射线照相挑战
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):375-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq032. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
6
An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary).数字放射成像的曝光指示器:美国医学物理学家协会任务组116(执行摘要)
Med Phys. 2009 Jul;36(7):2898-914. doi: 10.1118/1.3121505.
7
Digital radiography reject analysis: data collection methodology, results, and recommendations from an in-depth investigation at two hospitals.数字放射摄影拒收分析:两家医院深入调查的数据收集方法、结果及建议
J Digit Imaging. 2009 Mar;22(1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9112-5. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
8
A comparison of image reject rates when using film, hard copy computed radiography and soft copy images on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) workstations.在图片存档与通信系统(PACS)工作站上使用胶片、硬拷贝计算机X线摄影和软拷贝图像时图像拒收率的比较。
Br J Radiol. 1999 Jul;72(859):653-60. doi: 10.1259/bjr.72.859.10624322.