• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甜味饮料税与费城独立商店饮料和高糖食品购买量的关联。

Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113527. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13527.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13527
PMID:34129022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8207239/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The relationship between a sweetened beverage tax and changes in the prices and purchases of beverages and high-sugar food is understudied in the long term and in small independent food retail stores where sugar-sweetened beverages are among the most commonly purchased items.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether a 1.5 cent-per-fluid-ounce excise tax on sugar- and artificially sweetened beverages Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was associated with sustained changes in beverage prices and purchases, as well as calories purchased from beverages and high-sugar foods, over 2 years at small independent stores.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used a difference-in-differences approach to compare changes in beverage prices and purchases of beverages and high-sugar foods (candy, sweet snacks) at independent stores in Philadelphia and Baltimore, Maryland (a nontaxed control) before and 2 years after tax implementation, which occurred on January 1, 2017. Price comparisons were also made to independent stores in Philadelphia's neighboring counties.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Changes in mean price (measured in cents per fluid ounce) of taxed and nontaxed beverages, mean fluid ounces purchased of taxed and nontaxed beverages, and mean total calories purchased from beverages and high-sugar foods.

RESULTS

Compared with Baltimore independent stores, taxed beverage prices in Philadelphia increased 2.06 cents per fluid ounce (95% CI, 1.75 to 2.38 cents per fluid ounce; P < .001), with 137% of the tax passed through to prices 2 years after tax implementation, while nontaxed beverage prices had no statistically significant change. A total of 116 independent stores and 4738 customer purchases (1950 [41.2%] women; 4351 [91.8%] age 18 years or older; 1006 [21.2%] White customers, 3185 [67.2%] Black customers) at independent stores were assessed for price and purchase comparisons. Purchases of taxed beverages declined by 6.1 fl oz (95% CI, -9.9 to -2.4 fl oz; P < .001), corresponding to a 42% decline in Philadelphia compared with Baltimore; there were no significant changes in purchases of nontaxed beverages. Although there was no significant moderation by neighborhood income or customer education level, exploratory stratified analyses revealed that declines in taxed beverage purchases were larger among customers shopping in low-income neighborhoods (-7.1 fl oz; 95% CI, -13.0 to -1.1 fl oz; P = .001) and individuals with lower education levels (-6.9 fl oz; 95% CI, -12.5 to -1.3 fl oz; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study found that a tax on sweetened beverages was associated with increases in price and decreases in purchasing. Beverage excise taxes may be an effective policy to sustainably decrease purchases of sweetened drinks and calories from sugar in independent stores, with large reductions in lower-income areas and among customers with lower levels of education.

摘要

重要性:在长期和小型独立食品零售商店中,甜味饮料税与饮料和高糖食品价格和购买量之间的关系研究不足,而在这些商店中,加糖和人工甜味饮料是最常购买的商品之一。

目的:研究宾夕法尼亚州费城实施每盎司 1.5 美分的含糖和人工甜味饮料消费税是否与 2 年来小型独立商店中饮料价格和购买量的持续变化以及饮料和高糖食品(糖果、甜零食)购买量的持续变化有关。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项使用差异中的差异方法的横断面研究,比较了费城和马里兰州巴尔的摩(无税对照)独立商店在税收实施前(2017 年 1 月 1 日)和实施后 2 年内(税收实施后)的饮料和高糖食品(糖果、甜零食)的饮料价格和购买量变化,税收实施后)。还对费城邻近县的独立商店进行了价格比较。

主要结果和测量:征税和未征税饮料的平均价格(以每液盎司美分为单位)变化、征税和未征税饮料的平均购买液盎司数以及饮料和高糖食品购买的总卡路里数变化。

结果:与巴尔的摩独立商店相比,费城征税饮料价格每液盎司上涨 2.06 美分(95%置信区间,1.75 至 2.38 美分;P<0.001),实施税收后 2 年内有 137%的税收转嫁给了价格,而未征税饮料价格没有统计学意义上的变化。共有 116 家独立商店和 4738 名顾客购买(1950 名[41.2%]为女性;4351 名[91.8%]年龄在 18 岁或以上;1006 名[21.2%]为白人顾客,3185 名[67.2%]为黑人顾客)参与了价格和购买比较。征税饮料的购买量下降了 6.1 液盎司(95%置信区间,-9.9 至-2.4 液盎司;P<0.001),与巴尔的摩相比,费城下降了 42%;未征税饮料的购买量没有显著变化。尽管收入和客户教育水平的邻里调节作用不显著,但探索性分层分析表明,在低收入社区购物的顾客征税饮料购买量下降幅度更大(-7.1 液盎司;95%置信区间,-13.0 至-1.1 液盎司;P=0.001),教育水平较低的个体(-6.9 液盎司;95%置信区间,-12.5 至-1.3 液盎司;P=0.001)。

结论和相关性:这项横断面研究发现,甜味饮料税与价格上涨和购买量下降有关。饮料消费税可能是一种可持续减少独立商店中加糖饮料和糖摄入的有效政策,在低收入地区和教育程度较低的顾客中,减少幅度较大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6708/8207239/7bb587d2ae05/jamanetwopen-e2113527-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6708/8207239/7bb587d2ae05/jamanetwopen-e2113527-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6708/8207239/7bb587d2ae05/jamanetwopen-e2113527-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.甜味饮料税与费城独立商店饮料和高糖食品购买量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113527. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13527.
2
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
3
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
4
The Association Of A Sweetened Beverage Tax With Changes In Beverage Prices And Purchases At Independent Stores.含糖饮料税与独立商店饮料价格及购买量变化的关联
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1130-1139. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01058.
5
Purchases of Nontaxed Foods, Beverages, and Alcohol in a Longitudinal Cohort After Implementation of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax.费城饮料税后纵向队列中免税食品、饮料和酒类的购买情况
J Nutr. 2022 Mar 3;152(3):880-888. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab421.
6
Philadelphia Beverage Tax and Association With Prices, Purchasing, and Individual-Level Substitution in a National Pharmacy Chain.费城饮料税与全国连锁药店价格、购买行为和个体替代行为的关联
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323200. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23200.
7
One-year changes in sugar-sweetened beverage consumers' purchases following implementation of a beverage tax: a longitudinal quasi-experiment.实施饮料税后消费者购买含糖饮料的一年变化:一项纵向准实验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Sep 1;112(3):644-651. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa158.
8
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
9
Oakland's sugar-sweetened beverage tax: Impacts on prices, purchases and consumption by adults and children.奥克兰市的含糖饮料税:对成年人及儿童的价格、购买量和消费量的影响
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100865. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100865. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
10
Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years.费城饮料税对饮料价格和销售的持续影响长达两年。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Jun;62(6):921-929. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of the Philadelphia sweetened beverage tax with changes in adult body weight: an interrupted time series analysis.费城甜味饮料税与成人体重变化的关联:一项中断时间序列分析。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Oct 12;39:100906. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100906. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Decreases in purchases of energy, sodium, sugar, and saturated fat 3 years after implementation of the Chilean food labeling and marketing law: An interrupted time series analysis.智利食品标签和营销法实施 3 年后能量、钠、糖和饱和脂肪购买量的下降:一项中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2024 Sep 27;21(9):e1004463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004463. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases: Evidence from four city-level taxes in the United States.含糖饮料税对购买行为的影响:来自美国四个城市层面税收的证据。
Health Econ. 2020 Oct;29(10):1289-1306. doi: 10.1002/hec.4141. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
2
No Evidence of Food or Alcohol Substitution in Response to a Sweetened Beverage Tax.没有证据表明含糖饮料税会导致食品和酒类替代。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Feb;60(2):e49-e57. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.021.
3
The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on employment: A synthetic control analysis.
Effectiveness of implemented global dietary interventions: a scoping review of fiscal policies.
实施全球饮食干预措施的效果:财政政策的范围界定综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2552. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19988-4.
4
Impact of soda tax on beverage price, sale, purchase, and consumption in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis of natural experiments.美国苏打税对饮料价格、销售、购买和消费的影响:基于自然实验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 22;11:1126569. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1126569. eCollection 2023.
5
Advertising and Stocking at Small Retailers: A Sweetened Beverage Excise Tax in Philadelphia.在小型零售商处进行广告和库存管理:费城的含糖饮料消费税。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Mar;66(3):408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.09.022. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
6
Evaluation of the sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Oakland, United States, 2015-2019: A quasi-experimental and cost-effectiveness study.2015-2019 年美国奥克兰市含糖饮料税评估:一项准实验和成本效益研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Apr 18;20(4):e1004212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004212. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Perinatal Health: A Quasi-Experimental Study.含糖饮料税与围产期健康:一项准实验研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Sep;65(3):366-376. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.016. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
8
Changes in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in the first two years (2018 - 2020) of San Francisco's tax: A prospective longitudinal study.旧金山征税头两年(2018 - 2020年)含糖饮料消费的变化:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan 25;3(1):e0001219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001219. eCollection 2023.
9
Changes in Dental Outcomes After Implementation of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax.实施费城饮料税后的牙科效果变化。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Aug;65(2):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
10
Systematic review on fiscal policy interventions in nutrition.关于财政政策对营养干预措施的系统评价。
Front Nutr. 2022 Nov 29;9:967494. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.967494. eCollection 2022.
费城饮料税对就业的影响:一项合成控制分析。
Econ Hum Biol. 2021 Jan;40:100939. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100939. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
4
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
5
The Association Of A Sweetened Beverage Tax With Changes In Beverage Prices And Purchases At Independent Stores.含糖饮料税与独立商店饮料价格及购买量变化的关联
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1130-1139. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01058.
6
Characterizing Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption for US Children and Adolescents by Race/Ethnicity.描述美国儿童和青少年按种族/族裔划分的含糖饮料消费情况。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Dec;7(6):1100-1116. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00733-7. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
7
Oakland's sugar-sweetened beverage tax: Impacts on prices, purchases and consumption by adults and children.奥克兰市的含糖饮料税:对成年人及儿童的价格、购买量和消费量的影响
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100865. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100865. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
8
The impact of the Oakland sugar-sweetened beverage tax on bottled soda and fountain drink prices in fast-food restaurants.奥克兰含糖饮料税对快餐店瓶装汽水和 fountain 饮料价格的影响。 注:这里“fountain drink”直译为“喷泉饮料”,在餐饮行业常指快餐店等场所通过饮料机供应的现调饮料 。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Dec 23;17:101034. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101034. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
The impact of the Cook County, IL, Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices.伊利诺伊州库克县含糖饮料税对饮料价格的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100855. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100855. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children.费城饮料税对成年人和儿童购买和消费的影响。
J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;67:102225. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102225. Epub 2019 Aug 13.