• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Sepsis risk calculator-guided antibiotic management in neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis].[脓毒症风险计算器指导下的疑似早发型脓毒症新生儿抗生素管理]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun;23(6):582-587. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101167.
2
Comparison of NICE Guideline CG149 and the Sepsis Risk Calculator for the Management of Early-Onset Sepsis on the Postnatal Ward.比较 NICE 指南 CG149 和脓毒症风险计算器在新生儿病房管理早发性脓毒症的应用。
Neonatology. 2021;118(5):562-568. doi: 10.1159/000518059. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
3
Potential benefit from the implementation of the Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator on clinical management of neonates with presumed sepsis.实施凯撒永久新生儿早发性败血症计算器对疑似败血症新生儿临床管理的潜在益处。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Mar;181(3):1001-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04282-x. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
4
A comparison between risk-factor guidance for neonatal early-onset sepsis and Kaiser Permanente sepsis risk calculator in a Greek cohort.希腊队列中新生儿早发性败血症的风险因素指导与凯撒永久败血症风险计算器的比较。
Early Hum Dev. 2021 Apr;155:105331. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105331. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
Comparison of the management recommendations of the Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis risk calculator (SRC) with NICE guideline CG149 in infants ≥34 weeks' gestation who developed early-onset sepsis.比较 Kaiser Permanente 新生儿早发性败血症风险计算器(SRC)与 NICE 指南 CG149 在 ≥34 周胎龄发生早发性败血症的婴儿中的管理建议。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Nov;105(6):581-586. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317165. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
6
Early-onset sepsis risk calculator: a review of its effectiveness and comparative study with our evidence-based local guidelines.早发型脓毒症风险计算器:有效性评价及其与本地区循证指南的比较研究。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Mar 25;47(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01028-1.
7
Sepsis calculator implementation reduces empiric antibiotics for suspected early-onset sepsis.Sepsis 计算器的应用减少了疑似早发性败血症患者经验性使用抗生素的情况。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 May;177(5):741-746. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3113-2. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
8
[C-reactive protein-guided antibiotic treatment strategy for neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis].[C反应蛋白指导下的疑似早发型败血症新生儿抗生素治疗策略]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jan;22(1):12-16. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2020.01.004.
9
The impact of the early onset neonatal sepsis calculator on antibiotic initiation: a single center study in Israel.早期新生儿败血症计算器对抗生素起始治疗的影响:以色列的一项单中心研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jul;182(7):3187-3194. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04993-3. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
10
Reducing antibiotic use in asymptomatic term infants exposed to maternal chorioamnionitis: Predictive role of sepsis risk calculator.减少母亲绒毛膜羊膜炎下无症状足月婴儿的抗生素使用:脓毒症风险计算器的预测作用。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Nov;58(11):1958-1963. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16128. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
[Advances in clinical management of neonatal sepsis].[新生儿败血症的临床管理进展]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;26(5):518-522. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2309145.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic stewardship for early-onset sepsis.抗生素管理在早发性败血症中的应用。
Semin Perinatol. 2020 Dec;44(8):151325. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151325. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
2
Comparison of institutional guidelines with established early onset sepsis risk calculator in reducing antibiotic use in an inner-city NICU in US.比较机构指南与既定的早发性败血症风险计算器,以减少美国市中心 NICU 中的抗生素使用。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Jun;21:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.03.015. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
3
Comparison of the management recommendations of the Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis risk calculator (SRC) with NICE guideline CG149 in infants ≥34 weeks' gestation who developed early-onset sepsis.比较 Kaiser Permanente 新生儿早发性败血症风险计算器(SRC)与 NICE 指南 CG149 在 ≥34 周胎龄发生早发性败血症的婴儿中的管理建议。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Nov;105(6):581-586. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317165. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
Sensitivity of the Kaiser Permanente early-onset sepsis calculator: A systematic review and meta-analysis.凯撒医疗集团早发性败血症计算器的敏感性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Dec 22;19:100227. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.020. eCollection 2020 Feb.
5
[C-reactive protein-guided antibiotic treatment strategy for neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis].[C反应蛋白指导下的疑似早发型败血症新生儿抗生素治疗策略]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jan;22(1):12-16. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2020.01.004.
6
Utilization of a Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator to Guide Initial Newborn Management.利用新生儿早发型败血症计算器指导新生儿初始管理。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Sep 23;4(5):e214. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000214. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
7
Screening for early onset neonatal sepsis: NICE guidance-based practice versus projected application of the Kaiser Permanente sepsis risk calculator in the UK population.早发型新生儿败血症筛查:基于 NICE 指南的实践与 Kaiser Permanente 败血症风险计算器在英国人群中的预计应用比较。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Mar;105(2):118-122. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316777. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
Antibiotic Use in Childhood and Adolescence and Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case-Control Study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.儿童和青少年时期使用抗生素与炎症性肠病风险的关系:英国临床实践研究数据库中的病例对照研究。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020 Feb 11;26(3):440-447. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz137.
9
[Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis (version 2019)].《新生儿败血症诊断与管理专家共识(2019版)》
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 2;57(4):252-257. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.04.005.
10
Optimizing antibiotic use for early onset sepsis: A tertiary NICU experience.优化早发性脓毒症的抗生素使用:一家三级新生儿重症监护病房的经验
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2019;12(3):301-312. doi: 10.3233/NPM-180075.

[脓毒症风险计算器指导下的疑似早发型脓毒症新生儿抗生素管理]

[Sepsis risk calculator-guided antibiotic management in neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis].

作者信息

Shao Shi-Qi, Zhang Xin-Yin, Feng Kun, He Yun-Yan, Xiong Xiao-Mi, Hua Zi-Yu

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University/Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders/National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders/China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders/Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing 400014, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun;23(6):582-587. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101167.

DOI:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101167
PMID:34130779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8213997/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of sepsis risk calculator (SRC) in guiding antibiotic use in neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis (EOS).

METHODS

A total of 284 neonates with a gestational age of ≥ 35 weeks were enrolled as the control group, who were hospitalized in the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March to July, 2019 and were suspected of EOS. Their clinical data were retrospectively collected and the use of antibiotics was analyzed based on SRC. A total of 170 neonates with a gestational age of ≥ 35 weeks were enrolled as the study group, who were admitted to the hospital from July to November, 2020 and were suspected of EOS. SRC was used prospectively for risk scoring to assist the decision making of clinical antibiotic management. The two groups were compared in terms of the rate of use of antibiotics, blood culture test rate, clinical outcome, and adherence to the use of SRC.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the study group had a significantly higher SRC score at birth and on admission ( < 0.05). The rate of use of antibiotics in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group[84.7% (144/170) vs 91.5% (260/284), 6.8% decrease; < 0.05]. The blood culture test rate in the study group was also significantly lower than that in the control group (85.3% vs 91.9%, < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence rate of adverse outcomes and the final diagnosis of EOS ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SRC reduces the rate of empirical use of antibiotics in neonates with suspected EOS and does not increase the risk of adverse outcomes, and therefore, it holds promise for clinical application.

摘要

目的

评估脓毒症风险计算器(SRC)在指导疑似早发型脓毒症(EOS)新生儿使用抗生素方面的疗效。

方法

选取284例胎龄≥35周的新生儿作为对照组,于2019年3月至7月在重庆医科大学附属儿童医院住院,均疑似EOS。回顾性收集其临床资料,并基于SRC分析抗生素使用情况。选取170例胎龄≥35周的新生儿作为研究组,于2020年7月至11月入院,均疑似EOS。前瞻性地使用SRC进行风险评分,以辅助临床抗生素管理决策。比较两组抗生素使用率、血培养检查率、临床结局及SRC使用依从性。

结果

与对照组相比,研究组出生时及入院时SRC评分显著更高(<0.05)。研究组抗生素使用率显著低于对照组[84.7%(144/170)对91.5%(260/284),降低6.8%;<0.05]。研究组血培养检查率也显著低于对照组(85.3%对91.9%,<0.05)。两组不良结局发生率及EOS最终诊断率差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。

结论

使用SRC可降低疑似EOS新生儿经验性使用抗生素的比例,且不增加不良结局风险,因此具有临床应用前景。