Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.
Neural Plast. 2021 May 27;2021:5558138. doi: 10.1155/2021/5558138. eCollection 2021.
Transforaminal steroid injection is extensively used as a treatment in cases of herniated disc, but it is associated with complications. In comparison, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection has been used in musculoskeletal disorders and could be another option. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety aspects between ultrasound-guided transforaminal injections of PRP and steroid in patients who suffer from radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation. In a randomized controlled trial, ultrasound-guided transforaminal injections of either PRP ( = 61) or steroid ( = 63) were administered to a total of 124 patients who suffer from radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation. Patients were assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the physical function (PF) and bodily pain (BP) domains of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) before operation and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation. The rate and latency of F-wave were obtained before operation and 12 months postoperation. There was no statistical difference in terms of age and sex between both groups. Statistically significant improvements from the patients' data before operation to data obtained 1-month postoperation were observed in VAS, PPTs, ODI, and PF and BP of SF-36 in both groups and kept for 1 year. F-wave rate and latency were improved significantly at 1-year postoperation in both groups. Intergroup differences during follow-ups over a period of 1 year were not found to be significant in all the above assessment between the PRP and steroid groups. No complications were reported. The results showed similar outcome for both transforaminal injections using PRP and steroid in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, suggesting the possible application of PRP injection as a safer alternative. The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-INR-17011825).
经皮椎间孔内类固醇注射被广泛应用于治疗椎间盘突出症,但它与并发症相关。相比之下,富血小板血浆(PRP)注射已应用于肌肉骨骼疾病,可能是另一种选择。本研究旨在比较超声引导下 PRP 和类固醇经皮椎间孔内注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症根性疼痛患者的疗效和安全性。在一项随机对照试验中,共对 124 例因腰椎间盘突出症引起根性疼痛的患者进行了超声引导下经皮椎间孔内 PRP(=61)或类固醇(=63)注射。患者在术前和术后 1 周、1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月时采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、压力疼痛阈值(PPTs)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)以及 36 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)的生理功能(PF)和躯体疼痛(BP)领域进行评估。在术前和术后 12 个月时获取 F 波的波幅和潜伏期。两组间的年龄和性别无统计学差异。两组患者的 VAS、PPTs、ODI 和 SF-36 的 PF 和 BP 在术后 1 个月时均较术前显著改善,且在 1 年内保持稳定。两组患者的 F 波波幅和潜伏期在术后 1 年时均显著改善。在 1 年的随访期间,两组之间的上述所有评估均未发现组间差异有统计学意义。未报告并发症。结果表明,PRP 和类固醇经皮椎间孔内注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效相似,提示 PRP 注射可能是一种更安全的替代治疗方法。该试验在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR-INR-17011825)注册。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025-6-20
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024-8
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2020-12
J Exp Orthop. 2017-11-25
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017-4-1