Suppr超能文献

为人父母的前提条件:随时间和世代的变化

Preconditions to parenthood: changes over time and generations.

作者信息

Bodin Maja, Holmström Charlotta, Plantin Lars, Schmidt Lone, Ziebe Søren, Elmerstig Eva

机构信息

Centre for Sexology and Sexuality Studies, Malmö University, Sweden.

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2021 May 14;13:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.003. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Reproductive decision-making and fertility patterns change with time and place, and are influenced by contemporary societal factors. In this paper, we have studied biosocial aspects of reproductive decision-making over time and generations in a Nordic setting. The aim was to explore intergenerational changes and influences on decision-making, especially regarding preconditions to first birth. Twenty-six focus group interviews were conducted in southern Sweden, including a total of 110 participants aged 17-90 years. The analysis of the interviews resulted in six themes: (i) 'Providing security - an intergenerational precondition'; (ii) 'A growing smorgasbord of choices and requirements'; (iii) 'Parenthood becoming a project'; (iv) 'Stretched out life stages'; (v) '(Im)possibilities to procreate'; and (vi) 'Intergenerational pronatalism'. Our findings reflect increasing expectations on what it means to be prepared for parenthood. Despite increasing awareness of the precariousness of romantic relationships, people still wish to build new families but try to be as prepared as possible for adverse events. The findings also show how increasing life expectancy and medical advancements have come to influence people's views on their reproductive timeline.

摘要

生殖决策和生育模式会随着时间和地点而变化,并受到当代社会因素的影响。在本文中,我们研究了北欧环境下不同时间和代际的生殖决策的生物社会层面。目的是探讨代际变化以及对决策的影响,特别是关于初育的先决条件。我们在瑞典南部进行了26次焦点小组访谈,共有110名年龄在17至90岁之间的参与者。访谈分析得出了六个主题:(i)“提供保障——代际先决条件”;(ii)“选择和要求日益丰富多样”;(iii)“为人父母成为一个项目”;(iv)“生命阶段延长”;(v)“生育的(不)可能性”;以及(vi)“代际生育主义”。我们的研究结果反映出人们对为为人父母做好准备的意义的期望越来越高。尽管人们越来越意识到浪漫关系的不稳定,但人们仍然希望组建新家庭,并尽量为不利事件做好准备。研究结果还表明,预期寿命的增加和医学进步如何影响了人们对其生殖时间表的看法。

相似文献

1
Preconditions to parenthood: changes over time and generations.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2021 May 14;13:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.003. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Reflections on fertility and postponed parenthood-interviews with highly educated women and men without children in Sweden.
Ups J Med Sci. 2013 May;118(2):122-9. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.762074. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
4
The pros and cons of fertility awareness and information: a generational, Swedish perspective.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2023 Dec;26(2):216-225. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2021.1968045. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
6
What makes people ready to conceive? Findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 10;6:90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.012. eCollection 2018 Aug.
9
'Doing it in the right order': childless men's intentions regarding family formation.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Feb;25(1):188-196. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1778803. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Fertility preservation in the male pediatric population: factors influencing the decision of parents and children.
Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2022-30. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev161. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

3
Future anxiety and the motives for postponing parenthood: generational time perspective and life satisfaction as mediators.
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 12;15:1441927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1441927. eCollection 2024.
4
Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Childbearing Motivations Scale.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 28;22(2):186. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020186.
5
Childbearing intentions and influencing factors among single young adults in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.
Child Health Nurs Res. 2025 Jan;31(1):15-27. doi: 10.4094/chnr.2024.025. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
6
The mediating effect of maturity on anxiety and the motives for postponing parenthood.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 31;14(1):20258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71043-9.
8
Parenthood aspirations and understanding of factors that affect the chance of achieving them: A population survey.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2021 Dec 25;14:265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.006. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Not Just Later, but Fewer: Novel Trends in Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries.
Demography. 2021 Aug 1;58(4):1373-1399. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9373618.
2
Is it an issue before it's a problem? Investigating men's talk about fertility.
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Sep;42(7):1611-1625. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13148. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
'Doing it in the right order': childless men's intentions regarding family formation.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Feb;25(1):188-196. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1778803. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
4
Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries.
Eur J Popul. 2018 Jun 19;35(3):563-586. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
What makes people ready to conceive? Findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 10;6:90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.012. eCollection 2018 Aug.
7
Can Reproductive Life Plan-based counselling increase men's fertility awareness?
Ups J Med Sci. 2018 Dec;123(4):255-263. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1541948. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors.
Ups J Med Sci. 2018 Jun;123(2):71-81. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1480186. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
Is pregnancy planning associated with background characteristics and pregnancy-planning behavior?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Feb;95(2):182-9. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12816. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
10
Coherence of pregnancy planning within couples expecting a child.
Midwifery. 2015 Oct;31(10):973-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验