Bisogno Antonio Luigi, Favaretto Chiara, Zangrossi Andrea, Monai Elena, Facchini Silvia, De Pellegrin Serena, Pini Lorenzo, Castellaro Marco, Basile Anna Maria, Baracchini Claudio, Corbetta Maurizio
Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova 35100, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Università di Padova, Padova 35100, Italy.
Brain Commun. 2021 Jun 3;3(2):fcab119. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab119. eCollection 2021.
Neurological deficits following stroke are traditionally described as syndromes related to damage of a specific area or vascular territory. Recent studies indicate that, at the population level, post-stroke neurological impairments cluster in three sets of correlated deficits across different behavioural domains. To examine the reproducibility and specificity of this structure, we prospectively studied first-time stroke patients ( = 237) using a bedside, clinically applicable, neuropsychological assessment and compared the behavioural and anatomical results with those obtained from a different prospective cohort studied with an extensive neuropsychological battery. The behavioural assessment at 1-week post-stroke included the Oxford Cognitive Screen and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. A principal component analysis was used to reduce variables and describe behavioural variance across patients. Lesions were manually segmented on structural scans. The relationship between anatomy and behaviour was analysed using multivariate regression models. Three principal components explained ≈50% of the behavioural variance across subjects. PC1 loaded on language, calculation, praxis, right side neglect and memory deficits; PC2 loaded on left motor, visual and spatial neglect deficits; PC3 loaded on right motor deficits. These components matched those obtained with a more extensive battery. The underlying lesion anatomy was also similar. Neurological deficits following stroke are correlated in a low-dimensional structure of impairment, related neither to the damage of a specific area or vascular territory. Rather they reflect widespread network impairment caused by focal lesions. These factors showed consistency across different populations, neurobehavioural batteries and, most importantly, can be described using a combination of clinically applicable batteries (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Oxford Cognitive Screen). They represent robust behavioural biomarkers for future stroke population studies.
传统上,中风后的神经功能缺损被描述为与特定区域或血管区域损伤相关的综合征。最近的研究表明,在人群层面,中风后的神经功能障碍在不同行为领域的三组相关缺损中聚集。为了检验这种结构的可重复性和特异性,我们使用床边临床适用的神经心理学评估方法,对首次中风患者(n = 237)进行了前瞻性研究,并将行为和解剖学结果与另一组使用广泛神经心理学测试组合进行研究的前瞻性队列所获得的结果进行了比较。中风后1周的行为评估包括牛津认知筛查和美国国立卫生研究院中风量表。使用主成分分析来减少变量并描述患者之间的行为差异。在结构扫描上手动分割病变。使用多元回归模型分析解剖结构与行为之间的关系。三个主成分解释了约50%的受试者行为差异。主成分1与语言、计算、实践、右侧忽视和记忆缺陷相关;主成分2与左侧运动、视觉和空间忽视缺陷相关;主成分3与右侧运动缺陷相关。这些成分与使用更广泛测试组合获得的成分相匹配。潜在的病变解剖结构也相似。中风后的神经功能缺损在低维度损伤结构中相关,既与特定区域或血管区域的损伤无关。相反,它们反映了由局灶性病变引起广泛的网络损伤。这些因素在不同人群、神经行为测试组合中表现出一致性,最重要的是,可以使用临床适用测试组合(美国国立卫生研究院中风量表和牛津认知筛查)进行描述。它们代表了未来中风人群研究中强大的行为生物标志物。