Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital (Ahus), P.O.Box 10005, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;46(2):490-507. doi: 10.1007/s11013-021-09728-3. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
This article addresses conflicting concerns related to space for mourning in Norway. It draws on material from qualitative interviews with bereaved parents who have lost a child in stillbirth. Space for mourning, and the need for sick leave, arose as a crucial concern and complex issue in these interviews. Although initiatives have been developed to introduce grief as a valid category in diagnostic repertoires, it is not a legitimate basis for sick leave in the acute phase. Common alternatives have been referrals to psychic instability or depression. Both variations represent a medicalization of the normal with implications that need to be addressed, and which this article discusses from the bereaved parents' point of view. Extended parental leave, and the introduction of grief allowance, are possible alternatives for the provision of space in normal but demanding times of grief. Despite not yet part of the repertoire for gatekeepers in the Norwegian welfare state, they are part of the public discourse. Besides a crucial acknowledgment of the grief of the parents, these options also represent possibilities for preventing a pathologization of what is a normal rite of passage.
这篇文章探讨了挪威在哀悼空间方面存在的冲突问题。它借鉴了对因死产而失去孩子的丧亲父母进行的定性访谈的材料。在这些访谈中,哀悼空间和病假需求成为一个至关重要的关注点和复杂问题。尽管已经采取了一些举措,将悲伤作为诊断工具中的一个有效类别引入,但在急性阶段,它并不是请病假的合法依据。常见的替代方案是将其归为精神不稳定或抑郁。这两种变化都代表了对正常情况的医学化,需要加以解决,本文从丧亲父母的角度对此进行了讨论。延长父母的假期,并引入悲伤津贴,是在正常但要求苛刻的悲伤时期提供空间的可能选择。尽管这些选择尚未成为挪威福利国家把关者的手段之一,但它们已成为公共话语的一部分。除了对父母的悲痛给予至关重要的认可外,这些选择还为防止将正常的过渡仪式病态化为可能提供了可能性。