Stroebe M, Schut H
Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Death Stud. 1999 Apr-May;23(3):197-224. doi: 10.1080/074811899201046.
There are shortcomings in traditional theorizing about effective ways of coping with bereavement, most notably, with respect to the so-called "grief work hypothesis." Criticisms include imprecise definition, failure to represent dynamic processing that is characteristic of grieving, lack of empirical evidence and validation across cultures and historical periods, and a limited focus on intrapersonal processes and on health outcomes. Therefore, a revised model of coping with bereavement, the dual process model, is proposed. This model identifies two types of stressors, loss- and restoration-oriented, and a dynamic, regulatory coping process of oscillation, whereby the grieving individual at times confronts, at other times avoids, the different tasks of grieving. This model proposes that adaptive coping is composed of confrontation--avoidance of loss and restoration stressors. It also argues the need for dosage of grieving, that is, the need to take respite from dealing with either of these stressors, as an integral part of adaptive coping. Empirical research to support this conceptualization is discussed, and the model's relevance to the examination of complicated grief, analysis of subgroup phenomena, as well as interpersonal coping processes, is described.
传统上关于应对丧亲之痛有效方法的理论存在缺陷,最显著的是在所谓的“悲伤工作假说”方面。批评意见包括定义不精确、未能体现悲伤所特有的动态过程、缺乏跨文化和历史时期的实证证据及验证,以及对人际过程和健康结果的关注有限。因此,提出了一种修订后的应对丧亲之痛的模型——双重过程模型。该模型识别出两种类型的应激源,即丧失导向型和恢复导向型,以及一个动态的、调节性的振荡应对过程,在此过程中,悲伤的个体有时面对、有时回避悲伤的不同任务。该模型提出适应性应对由面对——回避丧失和恢复应激源组成。它还主张悲伤需要适度,也就是说,需要从应对这些应激源中的任何一个中暂时解脱出来,这是适应性应对的一个组成部分。讨论了支持这一概念化的实证研究,并描述了该模型与复杂悲伤的研究、亚组现象分析以及人际应对过程的相关性。