Eisenbruch M
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1984 Dec;8(4):315-47. doi: 10.1007/BF00114661.
Despite a growing interest in bereavement in cross-cultural perspective, few reports have described a comparative analysis of bereavement. By examining the social contexts in the transformations of Western bereavement practices, structures common to bereavement in a range of cultures can be identified. The paper compares the contemporary bereavement practices of several ethnic and cultural groups in North America: Blacks; ethnic Chinese; Southeast Asian refugees; Haitians; Italians; Greeks; and Spanish-speaking groups. Consideration is given to the state of widowhood in different cultural systems. The impact of modernization among traditional societies demonstrates that even though Western technologies are incorporated into the procedures followed by these modernizing societies, the deep cultural code remains intact. Five questions require further clarification: is bereavement an illness, or a rite de passage and a normal life event? How widespread and useful are protective factors, such as group support, that facilitate successful resolution of grief? How effective are mourning practices of various ethnic groups in preventing "bad grief", and might some of these practices be beneficial if taken up by other ethnic groups? How can the Western health practitioner know that a bereaved person from an unfamiliar cultural group is suffering "bad grief"? How acceptable is Western grief counseling to non-Western clients?
尽管跨文化视角下对丧亲之痛的兴趣日益浓厚,但很少有报告描述过丧亲之痛的比较分析。通过审视西方丧亲习俗转变中的社会背景,可以确定一系列文化中丧亲之痛的共同结构。本文比较了北美几个种族和文化群体的当代丧亲习俗:黑人;华裔;东南亚难民;海地人;意大利人;希腊人;以及说西班牙语的群体。文中考虑了不同文化体系中的寡妇状态。传统社会中现代化的影响表明,尽管西方技术被纳入这些正在现代化的社会所遵循的程序中,但深层文化代码依然完整。有五个问题需要进一步阐明:丧亲之痛是一种疾病,还是一种人生过渡仪式和正常生活事件?诸如群体支持等有助于成功化解悲痛的保护因素有多普遍且有效?各民族的哀悼习俗在预防“不良悲痛”方面效果如何,其中一些习俗被其他民族采用是否有益?西方医疗从业者如何知道来自陌生文化群体的丧亲者正在遭受“不良悲痛”?西方的悲伤辅导对非西方客户的可接受程度如何?