The Boden Collaboration for Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise & Eating Disorders, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Metabolism & Obesity Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0253127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253127. eCollection 2021.
Meal replacement Severely Energy-Restricted Diets (SERDs) produce ≥ 10% loss of body mass when followed for 6 weeks or longer in people with class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2). The efficacy of SERDs continues to be questioned by healthcare professionals, with concerns about poor dietary adherence. This study explored facilitators and barriers to dietary adherence and program attrition among people with class III obesity who had attempted or completed a SERD in a specialised weight loss clinic. Participants who commenced a SERD between January 2016 to May 2018 were invited to participate. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted from September to October 2018 with 20 participants (12 women and 8 men). Weight change and recounted events were validated using the participants' medical records. Data were analysed by thematic analysis using line-by-line inductive coding. The mean age ± SD of participants was 51.2 ± 11.3 years, with mean ± SD BMI at baseline 63.7 ± 12.6 kg/m2. Five themes emerged from participants' recounts that were perceived to facilitate dietary adherence: (1.1) SERD program group counselling and psychoeducation sessions, (1.2) emotionally supportive clinical staff and social networks that accommodated and championed change in dietary behaviours, (1.3) awareness of eating behaviours and the relationship between these and progression of disease, (1.4) a resilient mindset, and (1.5) dietary simplicity, planning and self-monitoring. There were five themes on factors perceived to be barriers to adherence, namely: (2.1) product unpalatability, (2.2) unrealistic weight loss expectations, (2.3) poor program accessibility, (2.4) unforeseeable circumstances and (2.5) externalised weight-related stigma. This study highlights opportunities where SERD programs can be optimised to facilitate dietary adherence and reduce barriers, thus potentially improving weight loss outcomes with such programs. Prior to the commencement of a SERD program, healthcare professionals facilitating such programs could benefit from reviewing participants to identify common barriers. This includes identifying the presence of product palatability issues, unrealistic weight loss expectations, socio-economic disadvantage, and behaviour impacting experiences of externalised weight-related stigma.
代餐 严重能量限制饮食(SERD)在患有 III 类肥胖(BMI≥40kg/m2)的人群中,遵循 6 周或更长时间,体重会减少≥10%。医疗保健专业人员对 SERD 的疗效一直存在质疑,他们担心饮食依从性差。本研究探讨了在专门的减肥诊所尝试或完成 SERD 的 III 类肥胖患者在饮食依从性和项目流失方面的促进因素和障碍。邀请了 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 5 月期间开始 SERD 的参与者参加。2018 年 9 月至 10 月进行了半结构化深入访谈,参与者 20 人(女性 12 人,男性 8 人)。使用参与者的病历验证体重变化和叙述事件。通过逐行归纳编码进行主题分析。参与者的平均年龄±SD 为 51.2±11.3 岁,基线时的平均 BMI±SD 为 63.7±12.6kg/m2。参与者的叙述中出现了五个主题,这些主题被认为有助于饮食依从性:(1.1)SERD 项目组的咨询和心理教育课程,(1.2)情感支持的临床工作人员和社会网络,这些工作人员和网络能够适应和支持饮食行为的改变,(1.3)对饮食行为的认识,以及这些行为与疾病进展之间的关系,(1.4)弹性思维,和(1.5)饮食简单化、计划和自我监测。有五个主题涉及到被认为是遵守障碍的因素,即:(2.1)产品口感不佳,(2.2)不切实际的减肥期望,(2.3)项目可及性差,(2.4)不可预见的情况,和(2.5)外化的与体重相关的耻辱感。本研究强调了 SERD 项目可以优化的机会,以促进饮食依从性并减少障碍,从而有可能改善此类项目的减肥效果。在开始 SERD 项目之前,促进此类项目的医疗保健专业人员可以从回顾参与者开始,以确定常见的障碍。这包括确定产品口感问题、不切实际的减肥期望、社会经济劣势以及行为对体验外化的与体重相关的耻辱感的影响。