Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Centre for Obesity Research, University College London, London, UK.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Jan 18;109(2):449-460. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad523.
Obesity increases risks of male infertility, but bariatric surgery does not improve semen quality. Recent uncontrolled studies suggest that a low-energy diet (LED) improves semen quality. Further evaluation within a randomized, controlled setting is warranted.
Men with obesity (18-60 years) with normal sperm concentration (normal count) (n = 24) or oligozoospermia (n = 43) were randomized 1:1 to either 800 kcal/day LED for 16 weeks or control, brief dietary intervention (BDI) with 16 weeks' observation. Semen parameters were compared at baseline and 16 weeks.
Mean age of men with normal count was 39.4 ± 6.4 in BDI and 40.2 ± 9.6 years in the LED group. Mean age of men with oligozoospermia was 39.5 ± 7.5 in BDI and 37.7 ± 6.6 years in the LED group. LED caused more weight loss than BDI in men with normal count (14.4 vs 6.3 kg; P < .001) and men with oligozoospermia (17.6 vs 1.8 kg; P < .001). Compared with baseline, in men with normal count total motility (TM) increased 48 ± 17% to 60 ± 10% (P < .05) after LED, and 52 ± 8% to 61 ± 6% (P < .0001) after BDI; progressive motility (PM) increased 41 ± 16% to 53 ± 10% (P < .05) after LED, and 45 ± 8% to 54 ± 65% (P < .001) after BDI. In men with oligozoospermia compared with baseline, TM increased 35% [26] to 52% [16] (P < .05) after LED, and 43% [28] to 50% [23] (P = .0587) after BDI; PM increased 29% [23] to 46% [18] (P < .05) after LED, and 33% [25] to 44% [25] (P < .05) after BDI. No differences in postintervention TM or PM were observed between LED and BDI groups in men with normal count or oligozoospermia.
LED or BDI may be sufficient to improve sperm motility in men with obesity. The effects of paternal dietary intervention on fertility outcomes requires investigation.
肥胖会增加男性不育的风险,但减肥手术并不能改善精液质量。最近的非对照研究表明,低能量饮食(LED)可改善精液质量。在随机对照研究中,需要进一步评估。
将 24 名具有正常精子浓度(正常计数)的肥胖男性(18-60 岁)和 43 名少精子症男性随机分为 1:1 组,分别接受 16 周 800 卡路里/天的 LED 治疗或对照组,即接受 16 周的简短饮食干预(BDI)。在基线和 16 周时比较精液参数。
正常计数 BDI 组男性的平均年龄为 39.4 ± 6.4 岁,LED 组为 40.2 ± 9.6 岁。少精子症 BDI 组男性的平均年龄为 39.5 ± 7.5 岁,LED 组为 37.7 ± 6.6 岁。与 BDI 组相比,LED 组的正常计数男性体重减轻更多(14.4 公斤 vs 6.3 公斤;P <.001)和少精子症男性(17.6 公斤 vs 1.8 公斤;P <.001)。与基线相比,正常计数男性的总运动力(TM)增加了 48 ± 17%至 60 ± 10%(P <.05),而 BDI 组增加了 52 ± 8%至 61 ± 6%(P <.0001);前向运动力(PM)增加了 41 ± 16%至 53 ± 10%(P <.05),而 BDI 组增加了 45 ± 8%至 54 ± 65%(P <.001)。与基线相比,少精子症 LED 组 TM 增加了 35%[26]至 52%[16](P <.05),BDI 组增加了 43%[28]至 50%[23](P =.0587);PM 增加了 29%[23]至 46%[18](P <.05),BDI 组增加了 33%[25]至 44%[25](P <.05)。正常计数或少精子症男性 LED 组和 BDI 组之间,干预后 TM 或 PM 无差异。
LED 或 BDI 可能足以改善肥胖男性的精子运动能力。需要研究父系饮食干预对生育结局的影响。