• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[认知刺激计划对认知正常老年人的影响分析:随机临床试验]

[Analysis of the effect of cognitive stimulation program in older adults with normal cognition: randomized clinical trial].

作者信息

Calatayud E, Gómez-Cabello A, Gómez-Soria I

机构信息

Departamento de Fisiatría y Enfermería. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad de Zaragoza. Zaragoza. España..

出版信息

An Sist Sanit Navar. 2021 Dec 27;44(3):361-372. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.0961.

DOI:10.23938/ASSN.0961
PMID:34142986
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive stimulation programs in older adults seek cognitive and emotional improvements. The literature makes no reference to programs adapted according to cognitive and occupational levels in older adults with no cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of level-adapted cognitive stimulation intervention in older adults in terms of cognition and mood.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trial (CONSORT) at a health center, which included 201 participants =?65 years (101 intervention and 100 control) evaluated immediately after the intervention, then at six months and finally at one year. The assessment instruments were the cognitive mini-exam (CME), the abbreviated Goldberg anxiety scale and the Yesavage geriatric depression scale (GDS-15). The intervention was carried out through a cognitive stimulation program with two cognitive levels according to CME (high: 32-35; low: 28-31) with ten sessions of 45 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test.

RESULTS

The difference observed in the averages between control and intervention groups was statistically significant in the three assessments; these differences were observed regardless of gender, age, cognitive level, and mood. One year after the intervention, CME score reached an increase of 1.48 points in the in the high level group and 2.03 points in the low level. However, no significant differences in CME score were observed in any of the assessments for anxiety or depression.

CONCLUSION

A cognitive stimulation program, cognitive level-adapted, has shown cognitive benefits in older adults without cognitive impairment living in the community, regardless of sex, age and educational level.

摘要

背景

针对老年人的认知刺激项目旨在改善认知和情绪。文献中未提及根据无认知障碍老年人的认知和职业水平进行调整的项目。本研究的目的是分析根据水平调整的认知刺激干预对老年人认知和情绪的有效性。

方法

在一个健康中心进行随机临床试验(CONSORT),纳入201名年龄≥65岁的参与者(101名干预组和100名对照组),在干预后立即进行评估,然后在六个月和一年后再次评估。评估工具包括认知迷你测试(CME)、戈德堡焦虑量表简表和耶萨维奇老年抑郁量表(GDS-15)。干预通过一个认知刺激项目进行,根据CME分为两个认知水平(高:32-35;低:28-31),共十节45分钟的课程。采用学生t检验进行统计分析。

结果

在三次评估中,对照组和干预组的平均差异具有统计学意义;无论性别、年龄、认知水平和情绪如何,均观察到这些差异。干预一年后,高水平组的CME分数提高了1.48分,低水平组提高了2.03分。然而,在焦虑或抑郁的任何评估中,CME分数均未观察到显著差异。

结论

一个根据认知水平调整的认知刺激项目,已显示出对社区中无认知障碍的老年人具有认知益处,无论其性别、年龄和教育水平如何。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of the effect of cognitive stimulation program in older adults with normal cognition: randomized clinical trial].[认知刺激计划对认知正常老年人的影响分析:随机临床试验]
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2021 Dec 27;44(3):361-372. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.0961.
2
Effects of cognitive stimulation program on cognition and mood in older adults, stratified by cognitive levels: A randomized controlled trial.认知刺激计划对不同认知水平老年人认知和情绪的影响:一项随机对照试验
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jul;110:104984. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.104984. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
3
[Long-term effect analysis of a cognitive stimulation program in mild cognitive impairment elderly in Primary Care: A randomized controlled trial].[基层医疗中针对轻度认知障碍老年人的认知刺激项目长期效果分析:一项随机对照试验]
Aten Primaria. 2021 Aug-Sep;53(7):102053. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102053. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
4
Effects of a Group-Based 8-Week Multicomponent Cognitive Training on Cognition, Mood and Activities of Daily Living among Healthy Older Adults: A One-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于小组的 8 周多成分认知训练对健康老年人认知、情绪和日常生活活动的影响:一项随机对照试验的一年随访。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2020;7(2):112-121. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2019.42.
5
Effectiveness of Personalized Cognitive Stimulation in Older Adults with Mild Possible Cognitive Impairment: A 12-month Follow-up Cognitive Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment.个性化认知刺激对轻度可能认知障碍老年人的疗效:轻度认知障碍认知刺激 12 个月随访。
Clin Gerontol. 2022 Jul-Sep;45(4):878-890. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2021.1937764. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
6
Analysis of the effectiveness of a computerized cognitive stimulation program designed from Occupational Therapy according to the level of cognitive reserve in older adults in Primary Care: Stratified randomized clinical trial protocol.根据初级保健中老年人认知储备水平设计的职业疗法计算机化认知刺激计划的有效性分析:分层随机临床试验方案。
Exp Gerontol. 2024 Oct 15;196:112568. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112568. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
7
8
9
[Analysis of the effect of a program of cognitive stimulation in elderly people with normal aging in primary care: Randomized clinical trial].[基层医疗中针对正常衰老老年人的认知刺激项目效果分析:随机临床试验]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Jan;52(1):38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
Multicomponent intervention combining a cognitive stimulation group and tai chi to reduce cognitive decline among community-dwelling older adults with probable dementia: A multi-center, randomized controlled trial.多组分干预结合认知刺激组和太极拳以减少社区居住的可能患有痴呆症的老年人的认知衰退:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Dementia (London). 2020 Aug;19(6):2073-2089. doi: 10.1177/1471301218814637. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Supera cognitive stimulation study with cognitively-unimpaired older adults: methodology and initial results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.针对认知未受损老年人的Supera认知刺激研究:一项随机对照临床试验的方法和初步结果
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2025 Jul;83(7):1-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809882. Epub 2025 Jul 2.