Ludwigsburg University of Education, Germany.
University of Trier, Germany.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jul;218:103352. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103352. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
We examined selective directed forgetting in motor memory using a new variant of a three-list approach, to distinguish between accounts of directed forgetting. Participants consecutively studied three lists (L1, L2, and L3) of four sequential four-finger movements each. After studying L2, participants in the forget group were instructed to selectively forget the just studied four items of L2 but to retain the previously studied four items of L1, whereas the remember group did not receive any forget instruction for L2 but was encouraged to retain the items of both lists. In addition, we switched (switch groups) or repeated the items-enacting hand (no-switch groups) between L2 and L3 for a manipulation of post-forget-cue material competition for L2. A final memory test assessed recall performance for all three lists. Selective directed forgetting (lower L2 recall in the forget group as compared to the remember group) only occurred if the same hand was used for L2 and L3 (high interference between L2 and L3 encoding) whereas no selective directed forgetting occurred if the hand switched between L2 and L3 (low interference between L2 and L3 encoding). These results suggest that an inhibitory mechanism caused (selective) directed-forgetting costs that was triggered when items studied after the forget instruction had the potential to interfere with already stored items (i.e. were to be enacted by the same hand). When subsequently studied items pertained to the other hand no directed-forgetting costs occurred.
我们使用一种新的三列表方法来检验运动记忆中的选择性定向遗忘,以区分定向遗忘的解释。参与者连续学习三个列表(L1、L2 和 L3),每个列表包含四个连续的四指运动。在学习 L2 之后,遗忘组的参与者被指示选择性地忘记刚刚学习的 L2 的四个项目,但保留之前学习的 L1 的四个项目,而记忆组没有收到任何关于 L2 的遗忘指令,但被鼓励保留两个列表的项目。此外,我们在 L2 和 L3 之间切换(切换组)或重复执行项目的手(无切换组),以操纵 L2 的遗忘后提示材料竞争。最后的记忆测试评估了所有三个列表的回忆表现。只有当 L2 和 L3 使用相同的手时(L2 和 L3 编码之间的干扰很高),才会出现选择性定向遗忘(遗忘组的 L2 回忆低于记忆组),而当 L2 和 L3 之间切换手时(L2 和 L3 编码之间的干扰很低),则不会出现选择性定向遗忘。这些结果表明,当遗忘指令后学习的项目有可能干扰已经存储的项目(即由同一手执行)时,一种抑制机制会引发(选择性)定向遗忘的成本。当随后学习的项目与另一只手相关时,则不会出现定向遗忘成本。