Schildkraut J M, Thompson W D
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Sep;128(3):456-66. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114994.
Data from a multicenter population-based case-control study were analyzed to assess the degree of aggregation of ovarian cancer in families. Included as cases were 493 women aged 20-54 who had been newly diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer. The frequency with which cases reported a family history of ovarian cancer was compared with the frequency for a group of 2,465 controls selected by random digit dialing. The odds ratios for ovarian cancer in first- and second-degree relatives were 3.6 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.8-7.1) and 2.9 (95% Cl 1.6-5.3), respectively, compared with women with no family history of ovarian cancer. The null hypothesis of no association was excluded on both the maternal and paternal sides of the families studied. Ovarian cancer in relatives was reported by women with malignant lesions but not by women with borderline lesions. These results did not seem to be attributable to the possible confounding effects of any of several covariates or to errors in reporting family history of ovarian cancer.
对一项基于多中心人群的病例对照研究的数据进行了分析,以评估卵巢癌在家族中的聚集程度。研究纳入了493名年龄在20至54岁之间、新诊断为上皮性卵巢癌的女性作为病例。将病例报告有卵巢癌家族史的频率与通过随机数字拨号选择的2465名对照组成员的频率进行了比较。与无卵巢癌家族史的女性相比,一级和二级亲属患卵巢癌的比值比分别为3.6(95%置信区间(CI)1.8 - 7.1)和2.9(95% CI 1.6 - 5.3)。在所研究家族的母系和父系方面,无关联的零假设均被排除。有恶性病变的女性报告了亲属患卵巢癌的情况,但有交界性病变的女性未报告。这些结果似乎并非归因于几种协变量中任何一种可能的混杂效应,也不是由于报告卵巢癌家族史时的错误。