Suppr超能文献

不同冲洗方案对基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响:共聚焦分析研究。

Influence of different irrigation regimens on the dentinal tubule penetration of a bioceramic-based root canal sealer: a confocal analysis study.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Oct;36(8):1771-1777. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03356-4. Epub 2021 Jun 20.

Abstract

This study aims to assess the efficacy of various irrigation protocols on the dentinal tubule penetration of a bioceramic-based endodontic sealer. Sixty-four single-rooted extracted human mandibular incisors were used. After instrumentation, teeth were randomly divided into the following four groups (n = 16 each) according to the final irrigation technique: group 1, conventional endodontic needle (CEN); group 2, EndoActivator (EA); group 3, Er,Cr: YSGG laser; group 4, XP-endo Finisher (XPF). The root canals were finally irrigated with 17% EDTA and 5.25% NaOCl for 1 min (min) respectively. The teeth were then obturated with Endosequence BC Points and rhodamine B dye-labeled BC Sealer. After 2 weeks, 1-mm-thick transverse sections were cut 2 and 5 mm from the apex, and examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy at 5 × magnification. The total percentage of sealer penetration (TPSP), sealer penetration area (SPA), and maximum sealer penetration depth (MSPD) was measured. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's multiple comparison, and Wilcoxon tests, with significance set at P < 0.05. At 2 mm level, no significant differences were detected among the groups (P > 0.05). At the 5 mm level, the XPF group showed significantly higher values for both TPSP and SPA in comparison with the Er,Cr: YSGG laser and CEN groups (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed with the EA group. The choice of different final irrigation techniques can affect dentinal tubule penetration.

摘要

本研究旨在评估各种冲洗方案对基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂在牙本质小管内渗透的效果。使用 64 颗单根下颌切牙。器械预备后,根据最终冲洗技术将牙齿随机分为以下四组(每组 n = 16):组 1,常规根管锉(CEN);组 2,EndoActivator(EA);组 3,Er,Cr: YSGG 激光;组 4,XP-endo Finisher(XPF)。最后分别用 17% EDTA 和 5.25% NaOCl 冲洗根管 1 分钟(min)。然后用 Endosequence BC 牙胶尖和罗丹明 B 标记的 BC 封闭剂进行根管封闭。2 周后,从根尖切取 1-mm 厚的横向切片,在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜下以 5×放大倍数观察。测量总封闭剂渗透百分比(TPSP)、封闭剂渗透面积(SPA)和最大封闭剂渗透深度(MSPD)。采用 Kruskal-Wallis、Dunn 多重比较和 Wilcoxon 检验进行数据分析,显著性水平设为 P < 0.05。在 2mm 水平,各组间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。在 5mm 水平,与 Er,Cr: YSGG 激光和 CEN 组相比,XPF 组的 TPSP 和 SPA 值均显著升高(P < 0.05),但与 EA 组无显著差异。不同的最终冲洗技术的选择可能会影响牙本质小管的渗透。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验