• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补术与肺栓塞:一项基于机构的回顾性队列研究。

Robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair and pulmonary embolism: an institution-based retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Obisesan Aanuoluwapo, Singhal Vinay, Satoskar Savni

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):501-505. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01264-x. Epub 2021 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-021-01264-x
PMID:34148191
Abstract

Hiatal hernia (HH) is an abnormal protrusion of components of the abdominal viscera through the esophageal hiatus. The laparoscopic approach is the gold standard for repair with the robotic technique now gaining wide acceptance. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a well-known post-operative complication but its incidence following robotically assisted HH repairs is not well known. This study provides a descriptive analysis of three patients who developed PE after robotic repairs of their HHs. The incidence of PE in the studied cohort was 2.7% (3 of 112) with a male preponderance (66.7%). The mean age of the patients was 55.3 years with a mean BMI of 32.2 kg/m. The average duration of surgery was 4.2 h with sizes of the diaphragmatic defects ranging from 3 to 6 cm. Confirmatory PE diagnosis was made with a chest CT angiogram and the mean length of hospital stay was 4 days. PE although rare, is a preventable cause of in-patient mortality and morbidity with implications on healthcare costs and hospital resource use. The Caprini model provides a guide to pre-operative patient risk stratification and PE prevention, and the patients in this study were in the moderate to high-risk groups. Risk factors common to all patients were: age > 40 years, BMI > 30 kg/m and duration of surgery > 2 h with one of the patients having a previous history of PE. There are no established PE chemoprophylaxis guidelines for robotic HH repairs and in this cohort, heparin was commenced 6-8 h post-operatively. Thus, there is a need for a consensus chemoprophylaxis guideline in this subset of surgical patients. PE following robotic HH repair is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased healthcare costs. Guidelines for effective pre-operative chemoprophylaxis for these repairs are needed to optimize patient outcomes.

摘要

食管裂孔疝(HH)是腹腔内脏器成分通过食管裂孔的异常突出。腹腔镜手术是修复的金标准,而机器人技术目前也得到了广泛认可。肺栓塞(PE)是一种众所周知的术后并发症,但其在机器人辅助HH修复术后的发生率尚不清楚。本研究对3例HH机器人修复术后发生PE的患者进行了描述性分析。研究队列中PE的发生率为2.7%(112例中有3例),男性占优势(66.7%)。患者的平均年龄为55.3岁,平均体重指数为32.2kg/m²。平均手术时间为4.2小时,膈肌缺损大小为3至6厘米。通过胸部CT血管造影确诊为PE,平均住院时间为4天。PE虽然罕见,但却是住院患者死亡率和发病率的可预防原因,对医疗成本和医院资源使用有影响。Caprini模型为术前患者风险分层和PE预防提供了指导,本研究中的患者属于中高危组。所有患者共有的危险因素为:年龄>40岁、体重指数>30kg/m²、手术时间>2小时,其中1例患者有PE既往史。目前尚无针对机器人HH修复的PE化学预防指南,在该队列中,术后6 - 8小时开始使用肝素。因此,在这部分手术患者中需要达成化学预防共识指南。机器人HH修复术后的PE与住院时间延长和医疗成本增加相关。需要有效的术前化学预防指南来优化这些修复手术患者的预后。

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair and pulmonary embolism: an institution-based retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补术与肺栓塞:一项基于机构的回顾性队列研究。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):501-505. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01264-x. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
2
Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补术与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术相比,具有较好的短期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2495-2502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07055-8. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Robotic Hiatal Hernia Repair Associated with Higher Morbidity and Readmission Rates Compared to Laparoscopic Repair: 10-Year Analysis from the National Readmissions Database (NRD).与腹腔镜修复相比,机器人食管裂孔疝修复术的发病率和再入院率更高:来自国家再入院数据库(NRD)的10年分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Mar;27(3):489-497. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05548-x. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Patients report significant improvement in quality of life following hiatal hernia repair-despite recurrence.尽管存在复发,患者仍报告在膈疝修补术后生活质量有显著改善。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6001-6007. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11106-0. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis.机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的围手术期结局:NSQIP 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5851-5857. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11158-2. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
6
Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repairs.机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补术学习曲线的累积求和分析
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3442-3450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08665-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Approach to Hiatal Hernia Repair: Results After 7 Years of Robotic Experience.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝:7年机器人手术经验的结果
Am Surg. 2020 Sep;86(9):1083-1087. doi: 10.1177/0003134820943547. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Safety of robotic assisted laparoscopic recurrent paraesophageal hernia repair: insights from a large single institution experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜复发性食管裂孔疝修补术的安全性:来自大型单机构经验的见解。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2560-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07291-y. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
9
Robotic repair of post-oesophagectomy hiatal hernia.机器人修复食管切除术后食管裂孔疝。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022 Jun;104(6):e171-e173. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0244. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
10
Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic techniques in hiatal hernia and crural repair: a review of current evidence and outcomes.机器人技术与腹腔镜技术在食管裂孔疝和裂孔旁疝修补术中的对比分析:当前证据与结果的综述。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1559-1569. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03126-5. Epub 2024 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients.美国血液学会 2019 年静脉血栓栓塞症管理指南:手术住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症的预防。
Blood Adv. 2019 Dec 10;3(23):3898-3944. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000975.
2
Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery.低分子量肝素用于腹部或盆腔手术的延长血栓预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 26;8(8):CD004318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004318.pub5.
3
[Application of Da Vinci robotic surgery to hernia repair].
[达芬奇机器人手术在疝修补术中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;21(7):740-743.
4
Anatomical Resections Improve Disease-free Survival in Patients With KRAS-mutated Colorectal Liver Metastases.KRAS 突变型结直肠癌肝转移患者行解剖性肝切除可改善无病生存。
Ann Surg. 2017 Oct;266(4):641-649. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002367.
5
Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study.传统腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜再次食管裂孔疝修补及抗反流手术的评估:一项队列研究
J Robot Surg. 2016 Mar;10(1):33-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0558-z. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
6
The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism.静脉血栓栓塞症的流行病学
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Jan;41(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1311-6.
7
Paraesophageal hernia repair in the emergency setting: is laparoscopy with the addition of a fundoplication the new gold standard?急诊情况下的食管旁疝修补术:添加胃底折叠术的腹腔镜手术是新的金标准吗?
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1790-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4447-8. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
8
Robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery.机器人辅助腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术及抗反流手术
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;112(3):266-70. doi: 10.1002/jso.23912. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
Inpatient resource use and cost burden of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the United States.美国深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的住院资源利用及成本负担
Clin Ther. 2015 Jan 1;37(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.10.024. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.食管裂孔疝管理指南。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4409-28. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3173-3. Epub 2013 Sep 10.