Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补术与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术相比,具有较好的短期疗效。

Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin Street, SM1661, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Department of Pathology & Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2495-2502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07055-8. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We postulated that the use of robotics may improve outcomes in hiatal hernia repair.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected Society of Thoracic Surgery database at a single institution of patients who underwent elective hiatal hernia repair from 2012 to 2017 using either laparoscopy or the da Vinci Xi robot. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes and then performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling to determine the factors associated with postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS

There were 293 consecutive patients who underwent elective hiatal hernia repair using either a laparoscopic (n = 151) or a robotic (n = 142) technique. There were no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, smoking history, presence of comorbidity, or hiatal hernia type. Seventy percent of the cases were a repair of either type III or type IV hiatal hernia. There were significantly higher ASA III and IV (7.9% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.03), higher Toupet fundoplication (83.4% vs. 44.4%, P < 0.001), and lower redo-repair (7.3% vs. 20.4%, P = 0.001) in the laparoscopic group compared to the robotic group. The hospital length of stay was significantly shorter (1.3 ± 1.8 vs. 1.8 ± 1.5 days, P = 0.003) and there were significantly lower rates of complications (6.3 vs. 19.2%, P = 0.001) after robotic compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. There was no difference in readmission rate and mortality. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that older age and laparoscopic technique were associated with higher complications after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The use of the Da Vinci Xi robot in our institution was associated with improved outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair despite a higher incidence of re-operative cases in the robotic group. Thus, short-term outcomes of Da Vinci Xi robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair are not inferior to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Further studies are needed to determine if Da Vinci Xi robot provides superior short-term and long-term outcome in treatment of symptomatic hiatal hernia.

摘要

背景

我们假设使用机器人可能会改善食管裂孔疝修补术的结果。

方法

我们对一家机构从 2012 年至 2017 年期间使用腹腔镜或达芬奇 Xi 机器人进行择期食管裂孔疝修补术的患者进行了前瞻性收集的胸外科协会数据库的回顾性分析。我们比较了患者的特征和结果,然后进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型分析,以确定与术后发病率相关的因素。

结果

共有 293 例连续患者接受了择期食管裂孔疝修补术,其中 151 例采用腹腔镜,142 例采用机器人技术。年龄、性别、BMI、吸烟史、合并症存在情况或食管裂孔疝类型均无显著差异。70%的病例为 III 型或 IV 型食管裂孔疝。腹腔镜组的 ASA III 和 IV 分级(7.9% vs. 4.2%,P=0.03)、较高的 Toupet 胃底折叠术(83.4% vs. 44.4%,P<0.001)和较低的再次修复(7.3% vs. 20.4%,P=0.001)比例明显更高。与机器人组相比,腹腔镜组的住院时间明显更短(1.3±1.8 vs. 1.8±1.5 天,P=0.003),并发症发生率(6.3% vs. 19.2%,P=0.001)明显更低。机器人组与腹腔镜组在再入院率和死亡率方面没有差异。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,年龄较大和腹腔镜技术与术后并发症的发生相关。

结论

与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术相比,达芬奇 Xi 机器人在本机构的使用与改善的结果相关,尽管机器人组的再手术病例发生率较高。因此,达芬奇 Xi 机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补术的短期结果并不逊于腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术。需要进一步的研究来确定达芬奇 Xi 机器人在治疗有症状的食管裂孔疝方面是否提供了更好的短期和长期结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验