Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Memory. 2021 Jul;29(6):744-761. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1942920. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
Immediate recall of lists of items in random serial order has been examined in thousands of studies throughout the history of experimental psychology. In most studies, though, there have been no repetitions of items within a list, or occasionally a single repetition. These stimuli differ from the common uses of item series, which often include multiple repetitions (e.g., identification numbers; orders of people at a restaurant table). To begin to understand such cases we presented lists that, in some trial blocks, were constructed with no restrictions on repetitions. Specifically, we examined immediate serial recall of visually-presented, nine-digit lists, either spatially separated into three separate groups of three digits (Experiment 1) or undivided (Experiment 2). Many of the lists included single or multiple repetitions of digits, with repeated digits either adjacent or non-adjacent in an unpredictable manner. We assessed theoretical expectations derived from prior research. Effects of repetition were often helpful but, when repetitions favoured a grouping that conflicted with the presented grouping into threes in Experiment 1, repetition was disadvantageous. We suggest a theoretical analysis in which participants can use presented grouping cues or, when those cues are absent, create their own groupings to exploit repetitions among the stimuli.
在实验心理学的历史上,已经有数千项研究对随机顺序项目列表的即时回忆进行了检验。然而,在大多数研究中,列表内的项目没有重复,或者偶尔只有一次重复。这些刺激与项目序列的常见用法不同,后者通常包括多次重复(例如,识别号码;餐厅餐桌旁的人的顺序)。为了开始理解这些情况,我们呈现了一些列表,在某些试验块中,这些列表的构建没有重复的限制。具体来说,我们检查了以视觉方式呈现的、九位数列表的即时连续回忆,这些列表要么以三个单独的三位数组空间分隔(实验 1),要么不分隔(实验 2)。许多列表包括单个或多个数字的重复,重复的数字以不可预测的方式相邻或不相邻。我们评估了源自先前研究的理论预期。重复的效果通常很有帮助,但是,当重复有利于与实验 1 中呈现的三分组相冲突的分组时,重复则不利。我们提出了一种理论分析,其中参与者可以使用呈现的分组线索,或者在没有这些线索的情况下,创建自己的分组来利用刺激之间的重复。