• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在行政数据中识别同居伴侣:来自医疗保险地址数据的证据。

Identifying Cohabiting Couples in Administrative Data: Evidence from Medicare Address Data.

作者信息

Matta Sasmira, Hsu Joanne W, Iwashyna Theodore J, Baum Micah Y, Langa Kenneth M, Nicholas Lauren Hersch

机构信息

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Health Care Management and Economics, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

出版信息

Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2021 Jun;21(2):238-247. doi: 10.1007/s10742-020-00229-1. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10742-020-00229-1
PMID:34149307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8210751/
Abstract

Marital status is recognized as an important social determinant of health, income, and social support, but is rarely available in administrative data. We assessed the feasibility of using exact address data and zip code history to identify cohabiting couples using the 2018 Medicare Vital Status file and ZIP codes in the 2011-2014 Master Beneficiary Summary Files. Medicare beneficiaries meeting our algorithm displayed characteristics consistent with assortative mating and resembled known married couples in the Health and Retirement Study linked to Medicare claims. Address information represents a promising strategy for identifying cohabiting couples in administrative data including healthcare claims and other data types.

摘要

婚姻状况被视为健康、收入和社会支持的重要社会决定因素,但行政数据中很少有这方面的信息。我们利用2018年医疗保险生命状态文件和2011 - 2014年主要受益人汇总文件中的邮政编码,评估了使用精确地址数据和邮政编码历史来识别同居伴侣的可行性。符合我们算法的医疗保险受益人表现出与选择性婚配一致的特征,并且类似于与医疗保险理赔相关联的健康与退休研究中已知的已婚夫妇。地址信息是在包括医疗保健理赔和其他数据类型在内的行政数据中识别同居伴侣的一种有前景的策略。

相似文献

1
Identifying Cohabiting Couples in Administrative Data: Evidence from Medicare Address Data.在行政数据中识别同居伴侣:来自医疗保险地址数据的证据。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2021 Jun;21(2):238-247. doi: 10.1007/s10742-020-00229-1. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
Benefit adequacy among elderly Social Security retired-worker beneficiaries and the SSI federal benefit rate.老年社会保障退休工人受益人的福利充足性与补充保障收入联邦福利率。
Soc Secur Bull. 2007;67(3):29-51.
3
Why are cohabiting relationships more violent than marriages?为什么同居关系比婚姻关系更暴力?
Demography. 2006 Feb;43(1):127-40. doi: 10.1353/dem.2006.0007.
4
Partners in Health: Investigating Social Genetic Effects Among Married and Cohabiting Couples.健康伙伴关系:研究已婚和同居夫妇的社会遗传效应。
Behav Genet. 2023 Jul;53(4):348-358. doi: 10.1007/s10519-023-10147-w. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
5
New heterosexually transmitted HIV infections in married or cohabiting couples in urban Zambia and Rwanda: an analysis of survey and clinical data.赞比亚和卢旺达城市地区已婚或同居伴侣中新发异性传播艾滋病毒感染情况:调查与临床数据分析
Lancet. 2008 Jun 28;371(9631):2183-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60953-8.
6
The educational homogamy gap between married and cohabiting couples in Latin America.拉丁美洲已婚夫妇与同居伴侣之间的教育同质性差距。
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2013;32(1):81-102. doi: 10.1007/s11113-012-9263-4.
7
Developing and Validating a Measure to Estimate Poverty in Medicare Administrative Data.开发并验证一种在医疗保险管理数据中衡量贫困的方法。
Med Care. 2019 Aug;57(8):601-607. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001154.
8
Income dynamics in couples and the dissolution of marriage and cohabitation.夫妻的收入动态以及婚姻与同居关系的解除。
Demography. 2007 Feb;44(1):159-79. doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0005.
9
Same-Sex and Different-Sex Cohabiting Couple Relationship Stability.同性和异性同居伴侣关系的稳定性。
Demography. 2016 Aug;53(4):937-53. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0490-x.
10
Pathways to educational homogamy in marital and cohabiting unions.婚姻和同居伴侣中教育同型婚配的途径。
Demography. 2010 Aug;47(3):735-53. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0124.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Address Data to Track Household Financial Burden of Disease.利用地址数据追踪家庭疾病经济负担。
Med Care. 2023 Dec 1;61(12 Suppl 2):S92-S94. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001909. Epub 2023 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

1
The Demography of Families: A Review of Patterns and Change.家庭人口统计学:模式与变化综述
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):9-34. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12612. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
2
A Claims-Based Examination of Health Care Costs Among Spouses of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease.基于索赔的阿尔茨海默病患者配偶的医疗费用分析。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Jun 1;72(6):811-817. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx029.
3
Gender gaps--Life expectancy and proportion of life in poor health.性别差距——预期寿命和健康不良生活比例。
Health Rep. 2014 Dec;25(12):12-9.
4
Cohort Profile: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).队列简介:健康与退休研究(HRS)
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):576-85. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu067. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
5
Impact of social factors on risk of readmission or mortality in pneumonia and heart failure: systematic review.社会因素对肺炎和心力衰竭患者再入院或死亡风险的影响:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Feb;28(2):269-82. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2235-x. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
6
Recruitment and retention of minority participants in the health and retirement study.健康与退休研究中少数民族参与者的招募和保留。
Gerontologist. 2011 Jun;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8-20. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq100.
7
Investigating the mechanism of marital mortality reduction: the transition to widowhood and quality of health care.探究婚姻死亡率降低的机制:向丧偶状态的转变与医疗保健质量
Demography. 2009 Aug;46(3):605-25. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0066.
8
Association between widowhood and risk of diagnosis with a sexually transmitted infection in older adults.老年丧偶与性传播感染诊断风险之间的关联。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99(11):2055-62. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160119. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
9
Wives and ex-wives: a new test for homogamy bias in the widowhood effect.妻子与前妻:丧偶效应中同质性偏差的一项新测试。
Demography. 2008 Nov;45(4):851-73. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0029.
10
The effect of widowhood on mortality by the causes of death of both spouses.丧偶对因夫妻双方死因导致的死亡率的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Nov;98(11):2092-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114348. Epub 2008 May 29.