• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妻子与前妻:丧偶效应中同质性偏差的一项新测试。

Wives and ex-wives: a new test for homogamy bias in the widowhood effect.

作者信息

Elwert Felix, Christakis Nicholas A

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Demography. 2008 Nov;45(4):851-73. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0029.

DOI:10.1353/dem.0.0029
PMID:19110901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2789302/
Abstract

Increased mortality following the death of a spouse (the "widowhood effect") may be due to (1) causation, (2) bias from spousal similarity (homogamy), or (3) bias from shared environmental exposures. This article proposes new tests for bias in the widowhood effect by examining husbands, wives, and ex-wives in a longitudinal sample of over 1 million elderly Americans. If the death of an ex-wife has no causal effect on the mortality of her husband, then an observed association between the mortality of an ex-wife and her husband may indicate bias, while the absence of an effect of an ex-wife's death on her husband's mortality would discount the possibility of homogamy bias (and also of one type of shared-exposure bias). Results from three empirical tests provide strong evidence for an effect of a current wife's death on her husband's mortality yet no statistically significant evidence for an effect of an ex-wife's death on her husband's mortality. These results strengthen the causal interpretation of the widowhood effect by suggesting that the widowhood effect is not due to homogamy bias to any substantial degree.

摘要

配偶死亡后死亡率上升(“寡妇效应”)可能归因于:(1)因果关系;(2)配偶相似性(同质性)导致的偏差;或(3)共同环境暴露导致的偏差。本文通过对100多万美国老年人的纵向样本中的丈夫、妻子和前妻进行研究,提出了针对寡妇效应偏差的新测试方法。如果前妻的死亡对其丈夫的死亡率没有因果影响,那么观察到的前妻死亡率与其丈夫死亡率之间的关联可能表明存在偏差,而前妻死亡对其丈夫死亡率没有影响则可以排除同质性偏差(以及一种共同暴露偏差)的可能性。三项实证测试的结果有力地证明了现任妻子的死亡对其丈夫死亡率有影响,但没有统计学上的显著证据表明前妻的死亡对其丈夫死亡率有影响。这些结果通过表明寡妇效应在很大程度上并非由同质性偏差所致,从而加强了对寡妇效应的因果解释。

相似文献

1
Wives and ex-wives: a new test for homogamy bias in the widowhood effect.妻子与前妻:丧偶效应中同质性偏差的一项新测试。
Demography. 2008 Nov;45(4):851-73. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0029.
2
The impact of husband's and wife's education and occupation on family size in Zimbabwe.津巴布韦夫妻的教育程度和职业对家庭规模的影响。
J Biosoc Sci. 1994 Oct;26(4):553-8. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000021672.
3
Act No. 18.802, of 23 May 1989, [amending the Civil Code and the Commercial Code and Act 16.618].1989年5月23日第18.802号法案,[修订《民法典》《商法典》及第16.618号法案]
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1989;16:72, 418-9.
4
Husband's and wife's drinking: unilateral or bilateral influences among newlyweds in a general population sample.夫妻饮酒情况:普通人群样本中新婚夫妇的单方或双方影响。
J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1999 Mar;13:130-8. doi: 10.15288/jsas.1999.s13.130.
5
What Factors Affect the Evolution of the Wife's Mental Health After the Husband's Retirement? Evidence From a Population-Based Nationwide Survey in Japan.哪些因素会影响丈夫退休后妻子的心理健康演变?来自日本一项基于人群的全国性调查的证据。
J Epidemiol. 2021 May 5;31(5):308-314. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200071. Epub 2020 May 23.
6
Measuring the effect of husband's health on wife's labor supply.衡量丈夫的健康状况对妻子劳动力供给的影响。
Health Econ. 2006 Jun;15(6):579-601. doi: 10.1002/hec.1084.
7
The emotional toll of spousal morbidity and mortality.配偶患病和死亡带来的情感负担。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;15(9):772-9. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318050c9ae.
8
Spousal mobility and earnings.配偶的流动性与收入。
Demography. 2008 Nov;45(4):829-49. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0028.
9
Couples' communication before the wife's death to cancer and the widower's feelings of guilt or regret after the loss - a population-based investigation.夫妻在妻子死于癌症前的沟通情况,以及丧偶者在失去亲人后的内疚或遗憾感——一项基于人群的调查。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(10):1564-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
10
Heightened mortality after the death of a spouse: marriage protection or marriage selection?配偶去世后死亡率升高:婚姻保护还是婚姻选择?
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1326-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Taking the problem of colliders seriously in the study of crime: A research note.在犯罪研究中认真对待对撞机问题:一篇研究笔记。
J Exp Criminol. 2023 Mar 30:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11292-023-09565-x.
2
Inter-City Emotional Synchrony Is Conditional on Mobility Patterns.城市间的情感同步取决于出行模式。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;12(11):410. doi: 10.3390/bs12110410.
3
The Future Strikes Back: Using Future Treatments to Detect and Reduce Hidden Bias.未来的反击:运用未来的治疗方法来检测和减少隐性偏见。
Sociol Methods Res. 2022 Aug;51(3):1014-1051. doi: 10.1177/0049124119875958. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
Mourning in a Pandemic: The Differential Impact of COVID-19 Widowhood on Mental Health.大流行中的哀悼:COVID-19 丧偶对心理健康的不同影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Dec 29;77(12):2306-2316. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac085.
5
Bereavement From COVID-19, Gender, and Reports of Depression Among Older Adults in Europe.因 COVID-19 而丧偶、性别与欧洲老年人的抑郁报告。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Jul 5;77(7):e142-e149. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab132.
6
Identifying Cohabiting Couples in Administrative Data: Evidence from Medicare Address Data.在行政数据中识别同居伴侣:来自医疗保险地址数据的证据。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2021 Jun;21(2):238-247. doi: 10.1007/s10742-020-00229-1. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
7
Regression-based negative control of homophily in dyadic peer effect analysis.基于回归的对偶同伴效应分析中同质性负向控制。
Biometrics. 2022 Jun;78(2):668-678. doi: 10.1111/biom.13483. Epub 2021 May 31.
8
Family embeddedness and older adult mortality in the United States.美国家庭嵌入与老年人口死亡率
Popul Stud (Camb). 2020 Nov;74(3):415-435. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2020.1817529. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
The Effects of Marital Status, Fertility, and Bereavement on Adult Mortality in Polygamous and Monogamous Households: Evidence From the Utah Population Database.婚姻状况、生育和丧偶对一夫多妻制和一夫一妻制家庭中成年人死亡率的影响:来自犹他州人口数据库的证据。
Demography. 2020 Dec;57(6):2169-2198. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00918-z.
10
Tracking the reach of COVID-19 kin loss with a bereavement multiplier applied to the United States.运用丧亲倍增器追踪 COVID-19 所致亲属丧失在美国的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17695-17701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007476117. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Issues: Dually Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries, Challenges and Opportunities.研究问题:医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格受益人群体、挑战与机遇
Health Care Financ Rev. 1998 Winter;20(2):1-10.
2
Heightened mortality after the death of a spouse: marriage protection or marriage selection?配偶去世后死亡率升高:婚姻保护还是婚姻选择?
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1326-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
3
The effect of widowhood on mortality by the causes of death of both spouses.丧偶对因夫妻双方死因导致的死亡率的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Nov;98(11):2092-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114348. Epub 2008 May 29.
4
Widowhood and mortality among the elderly: the modifying role of neighborhood concentration of widowed individuals.老年人中的丧偶与死亡率:丧偶者邻里集中程度的调节作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Feb;66(4):873-84. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.029.
5
Health outcomes of bereavement.居丧的健康后果。
Lancet. 2007 Dec 8;370(9603):1960-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61816-9.
6
The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years.32年间肥胖症在一个大型社交网络中的传播情况。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):370-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa066082. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
7
Power spectrum analysis and cardiovascular morbidity in anxiety disorders.焦虑症中的功率谱分析与心血管疾病发病率
Auton Neurosci. 2006 Jul 30;128(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2005.06.007. Epub 2006 May 30.
8
Mortality after the hospitalization of a spouse.配偶住院后的死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 16;354(7):719-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa050196.
9
Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003.1940年至2003年教育选型婚姻的趋势。
Demography. 2005 Nov;42(4):621-46. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0036.
10
Relation between early life socioeconomic position and all cause mortality in two generations. A longitudinal study of Danish men born in 1953 and their parents.两代人早年社会经济地位与全因死亡率之间的关系。对1953年出生的丹麦男性及其父母的纵向研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jan;59(1):38-41. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.020990.