Suppr超能文献

弱视视觉处理的时间特征

Temporal Characteristics of Visual Processing in Amblyopia.

作者信息

Hu Xia, Qin Yi, Ying Xiaoxiao, Yuan Junli, Cui Rong, Ruan Xiaowei, He Xianghang, Lu Zhong-Lin, Lu Fan, Hou Fang

机构信息

School of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Biosysen Ltd., Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2021 Jun 3;15:673491. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.673491. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Amblyopia affects not only spatial vision but also temporal vision. In this study, we aim to investigate temporal processing deficits in amblyopia.

METHODS

Twenty amblyopic patients (age: 27.0 ± 5.53 years, 15 males), and 25 normal observers (age: 25.6 ± 4.03 years, 15 males) were recruited in this study. Contrast thresholds in an orientation discrimination task in five target-mask stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) conditions (16.7 ms, 33.4 ms, 50.0 ms, 83.4 ms, and ∞/no noise) were measured. An elaborated perceptual template model (ePTM) was fit to the behavioral data to derive the temporal profile of visual processing for each participant.

RESULTS

There were significant threshold differences between the amblyopic and normal eyes [(1,43) = 10.6, = 0.002] and a significant group × SOA interaction [(2.75,118) = 4.98, = 0.004], suggesting different temporal processing between the two groups. The ePTM fitted the data well ( test, all s > 0.50). Compared to the normal eye, the amblyopic eye had a lower template gain ( = 0.046), and a temporal window with lower peak and broader width (all s < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the observed temporal deficits and visual acuity in amblyopia (s > 0.50). Similar results were found in the anisometropic amblyopia subgroup. No significant difference was found between the fellow eyes of the monocular amblyopia and the normal eyes.

CONCLUSION

Amblyopia is less efficient in processing dynamic visual stimuli. The temporal deficits in amblyopia, represented by a flattened temporal window, are likely independent of spatial vision deficits.

摘要

目的

弱视不仅影响空间视觉,还影响时间视觉。在本研究中,我们旨在调查弱视患者的时间处理缺陷。

方法

本研究招募了20名弱视患者(年龄:27.0±5.53岁,男性15名)和25名正常观察者(年龄:25.6±4.03岁,男性15名)。测量了在五种目标-掩蔽刺激起始异步(SOA)条件(16.7毫秒、33.4毫秒、50.0毫秒、83.4毫秒和∞/无噪声)下的方向辨别任务中的对比度阈值。将一个精细的感知模板模型(ePTM)拟合到行为数据中,以得出每个参与者视觉处理的时间特征。

结果

弱视眼与正常眼之间存在显著的阈值差异[(1,43)=10.6,P=0.002],并且存在显著的组×SOA交互作用[(2.75,118)=4.98,P=0.004],表明两组之间存在不同的时间处理方式。ePTM对数据拟合良好(F检验,所有P>0.50)。与正常眼相比,弱视眼的模板增益较低(P=0.046),并且时间窗口的峰值较低且宽度较宽(所有P<0.05)。在弱视患者中,观察到的时间缺陷与视力之间未发现显著相关性(P>0.50)。在屈光参差性弱视亚组中也发现了类似结果。单眼弱视患者的对侧眼与正常眼之间未发现显著差异。

结论

弱视在处理动态视觉刺激方面效率较低。以扁平的时间窗口为代表的弱视时间缺陷可能与空间视觉缺陷无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e15b/8211088/402c1f0fde78/fnins-15-673491-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验