The School of Graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
The School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;9:673698. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.673698. eCollection 2021.
Discrete choice experiment (DCE) as a tool that can measure medical stakeholders' preferences especially patients recently has been increasingly applied in health care. The aim of this study was to examine the hotspots and trends of the application of DCE in health care and to provide reference and direction for further development of DCE in the future. A bibliometric method was implemented using the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection for the period from the database established to December 8, 2020. The data files are imported into CiteSpace and Excel to analyze and visualize the annual volume of productive, authors, countries, cited journals, cited articles, and keywords. A total of 1,811 articles were retrieved, then we read the abstract of each paper one by one, and 1,562 articles were included after screening, with an exponential increase in publication volume. John F. P. Bridges contributed to 40 publications and ranked first, followed by F. Reed Johnson ( = 37), Julie Ratcliffe ( = 36). The majority of the papers were conducted in the United States ( = 513) and the United Kingdom ( = 433). The top three cited journals were "" ( = 981), "" ( = 893), and "" ( = 774), and the top three articles were "Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force," "Conjoint analysis applications in health-a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force," and "Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature." The research hotspots and trends included "health technology assessment," "survival," "preference based measure," and "health state valuation." The size of the literature about DCE studies in health care showed a noticeable increase in the past decade. The application of DCE in health care remains in an early growth phase, and "health technology assessment," "survival," "preference based measure," and "health state valuation" reflected the latest research hotpots and future trends.
离散选择实验(DCE)作为一种可以衡量医疗利益相关者偏好的工具,尤其是患者,最近在医疗保健领域得到了越来越多的应用。本研究旨在考察 DCE 在医疗保健中的应用热点和趋势,为今后 DCE 的进一步发展提供参考和方向。使用 Web of Science(WoS)核心合集数据库,采用文献计量学方法对 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 8 日期间的文献进行分析。将数据文件导入 CiteSpace 和 Excel 中,对年度发文量、作者、国家、被引期刊、被引文献和关键词进行分析和可视化。共检索到 1811 篇文章,然后逐一阅读每篇文章的摘要,筛选后共纳入 1562 篇文章,发文量呈指数增长。John F. P. Bridges 发表了 40 篇文章,排名第一,其次是 F. Reed Johnson(=37)和 Julie Ratcliffe(=36)。大多数论文发表于美国(=513)和英国(=433)。被引频次最高的前 3 种期刊分别为“Value in Health”(=981)、“Health Economics”(=893)和“Medical Decision Making”(=774),被引频次最高的前 3 篇文章分别为“Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force”“Conjoint analysis applications in health-a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force”和“Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature”。研究热点和趋势包括“卫生技术评估”“生存”“基于偏好的衡量”和“健康状态估值”。过去十年,DCE 在医疗保健领域的文献数量显著增加。DCE 在医疗保健中的应用仍处于早期增长阶段,“卫生技术评估”“生存”“基于偏好的衡量”和“健康状态估值”反映了最新的研究热点和未来趋势。