Suppr超能文献

穴位刺激疗法联合传统治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析

Acupuncture Point Stimulation Treatments Combined With Conventional Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Tsai Cheng-Lin, Lan Chou-Chin, Wu Chih-Wei, Wu Yun-Chun, Kuo Chan-Yen, Tzeng I-Shiang, Hsu Pei-Shan, Lee Chang-Ti, Hsieh Po-Chun

机构信息

Department of Chinese Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 4;8:586900. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.586900. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is a disease characterized by dyspnea, cough, and respiratory symptoms, leading to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL) and exercise capacity, is highly prevalent worldwide. Some studies demonstrated that acupuncture point stimulation treatments (APSTs) are effective and safe in treating patients with COPD. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to analyze the effects on HRQL and FEV1% predicted of diverse APSTs in treating patients with COPD. We searched seven electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with stable COPD patients comparing APSTs and conventional treatment (Tx) were included. The primary outcome was HRQL measured by COPD Assessment Test or St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. The secondary outcome was FEV1% predicted. We performed random effect network meta-analysis using a consistency model. This network meta-analysis analyzed 21 RCTs with 1,577 stable COPD participants. In comparison with Tx, acupressure massage (AM) + Tx [-5.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), -6.65 to -3.57] was the most effective intervention in improving HRQL, followed by moxibustion (Mx) + Tx (-2.86; 95% CI, -3.86 to -1.86). Moreover, in comparison with Tx, Mx + Tx (7.79; 95% CI, 2.16 to 13.42) was the most effective intervention in improving FEV1% predicted, followed by acupuncture (A) + Tx (5.79; 95% CI, 2.90 to 8.68). Combined interventions (APSTs + Tx) are more effective than single intervention in improving both HRQL and FEV1% predicted. AM, Mx, and A can be considered effective non-pharmacological complementary interventions in treating patients with COPD under Tx.

摘要

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种以呼吸困难、咳嗽和呼吸道症状为特征的疾病,会导致健康相关生活质量(HRQL)和运动能力受损,在全球范围内高度流行。一些研究表明,穴位刺激疗法(APSTs)在治疗COPD患者方面是有效且安全的。本系统评价和网状Meta分析的目的是分析不同APSTs对COPD患者HRQL和预测FEV1%的影响。我们检索了七个电子数据库。纳入了比较APSTs与传统治疗(Tx)的稳定COPD患者的随机对照试验(RCTs)。主要结局是通过COPD评估测试或圣乔治呼吸问卷测量的HRQL。次要结局是预测FEV1%。我们使用一致性模型进行随机效应网状Meta分析。该网状Meta分析分析了21项RCTs,涉及1577名稳定COPD参与者。与Tx相比,指压按摩(AM)+Tx[-5.11;95%置信区间(CI),-6.65至-3.57]是改善HRQL最有效的干预措施,其次是艾灸(Mx)+Tx(-2.86;95%CI,-3.86至-1.86)。此外,与Tx相比,Mx+Tx(7.79;95%CI,2.16至13.42)是改善预测FEV1%最有效的干预措施,其次是针刺(A)+Tx(5.79;95%CI,2.90至8.68)。联合干预(APSTs+Tx)在改善HRQL和预测FEV1%方面比单一干预更有效。在Tx基础上,AM、Mx和A可被视为治疗COPD患者有效的非药物辅助干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fdf/8211776/56370eeee9e2/fmed-08-586900-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验