Suppr超能文献

以同情心为中心的团队干预提高临床研究协调员韧性和幸福感的可行性、可接受性和初步有效性。

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Compassion-Centered Team Intervention to Improve Clinical Research Coordinator Resilience and Well-Being.

机构信息

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Department of Spiritual Health, Emory University Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Jul;17(7):e936-e946. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00120. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Oncology clinical research coordinators (CRCs) and team-based coordinator care are critical for the success of clinical trials. However, CRCs typically report elevated anxiety and burnout and many oncology centers have high levels of coordinator attrition. To address the need for a team-based intervention to reduce burnout and promote resilience and cohesion among CRCs, we developed a compassion-centered, team-based intervention, Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI).

METHODS

Participants were CRCs working in disease-specific teams within a comprehensive cancer center. CRCs were randomly assigned by team to either participate in four 60-minute sessions of CCSH-TI or receive the intervention after the study. To evaluate whether CCSH-TI is feasible and acceptable, we used a mixed-method approach including self-report questionnaires and a focus group. To evaluate the impact of CCSH-TI, we assessed self-reported resilience, well-being, burnout, and team civility before and immediately after the intervention period (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04060901).

RESULTS

Attendance varied by team, but all teams had rates more than 60%. Coordinators rated high levels of credibility of CCSH-TI to improve burnout, and the majority reported that they received benefits, particularly in resilience and stress management, indicating acceptability. Coordinators randomly assigned to CCSH-TI reported an increase in resilience compared with coordinators randomly assigned to the wait-list group (F(41) = 4.53, = .039).

CONCLUSION

Data from this pilot study indicate that CCSH-TI may be a feasible, credible, acceptable, and effective intervention to augment individual resilience among CRCs. However, the quantitative and qualitative data suggest that more comprehensive and systematic programming is necessary to truly mitigate burnout.

摘要

目的

肿瘤学临床研究协调员(CRC)和以团队为基础的协调员护理对于临床试验的成功至关重要。然而,CRC 通常报告焦虑和倦怠程度较高,许多肿瘤学中心的协调员离职率较高。为了解决需要基于团队的干预措施来减少倦怠感并促进 CRC 之间的适应力和凝聚力的问题,我们开发了一种以同情心为中心的、基于团队的干预措施,即同情心为中心的精神健康团队干预(CCSH-TI)。

方法

参与者是在综合癌症中心的特定疾病团队中工作的 CRC。CRC 按团队随机分配,要么参加四节 60 分钟的 CCSH-TI,要么在研究后接受干预。为了评估 CCSH-TI 是否可行和可接受,我们使用了一种混合方法,包括自我报告问卷和焦点小组。为了评估 CCSH-TI 的影响,我们在干预期前后评估了自我报告的适应力、幸福感、倦怠感和团队文明程度(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04060901)。

结果

出席率因团队而异,但所有团队的出席率都超过 60%。协调员高度评价 CCSH-TI 改善倦怠感的可信度,大多数协调员报告说他们从中受益,特别是在适应力和压力管理方面,表明该干预措施是可接受的。与等待名单组相比,随机分配到 CCSH-TI 的协调员报告的适应力增强(F(41) = 4.53,p =.039)。

结论

这项试点研究的数据表明,CCSH-TI 可能是一种可行、可信、可接受且有效的干预措施,可以增强 CRC 个体的适应力。然而,定量和定性数据表明,需要更全面和系统的编程才能真正减轻倦怠感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验