Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
OPM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ann Dyslexia. 2021 Oct;71(3):527-546. doi: 10.1007/s11881-021-00233-1. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
We examined the response to a phonics through spelling intervention in 52 children with dyslexia by analyzing their phonological, morphological, and orthographical spelling errors both before and after the intervention whereas their spelling errors before the intervention were compared with those of 105 typically developing spellers. A possible compensatory role of semantics on the intervention effects was also investigated. Results showed that before the intervention, children with dyslexia and the typically developing children both made most morphological errors, followed by orthographic and phonological errors. Within each category, children with dyslexia made more errors than the typically developing children, with differences being largest for phonological errors. Children with dyslexia with better developed semantic representations turned out to make less phonological, morphological, and orthographic errors compared with children with dyslexia with less developed semantic representations. The intervention for children with dyslexia led to a reduction of all error types, mostly of the orthographic errors. In addition, semantics was related to the decline in phonological, morphological, and orthographic spelling errors. This study implicates that semantic stimulation could benefit the spelling development of children at risk for or with dyslexia.
我们通过分析 52 名阅读障碍儿童在接受语音拼写干预前后的语音、形态和正字法拼写错误,研究了他们对语音拼写干预的反应,而在干预前,我们将他们的拼写错误与 105 名正常发育的拼写者进行了比较。我们还研究了语义对干预效果的可能补偿作用。结果表明,在干预前,阅读障碍儿童和正常发育儿童都犯了最多的形态错误,其次是正字法和语音错误。在每个类别中,阅读障碍儿童的错误都比正常发育儿童多,语音错误的差异最大。语义表征发育较好的阅读障碍儿童比语义表征发育较差的阅读障碍儿童犯的语音、形态和正字法错误更少。阅读障碍儿童的干预导致所有错误类型的减少,主要是正字法错误。此外,语义与语音、形态和正字法拼写错误的减少有关。这项研究表明,语义刺激可能有益于有阅读障碍风险或患有阅读障碍的儿童的拼写发展。