• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于美国注册研究的结肠镜腺瘤检出率的基准测试。

Benchmarking Adenoma Detection Rates for Colonoscopy: Results From a US-Based Registry.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care system, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 1;116(9):1946-1949. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001358.

DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001358
PMID:34158463
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is highly variable across practices, and national or population-based estimates are not available. Our aim was to study the ADR, variability of rates over time, and factors associated with detection rates of ADR in a national sample of patients undergoing colonoscopy.

METHODS

We used colonoscopies submitted to the GI Quality Improvement Consortium, Ltd. registry from 2014 to 2018 on adults aged 50-89 years. We used hierarchical logistic models to study factors associated with ADR.

RESULTS

A total of 2,646,833 colonoscopies were performed by 1,169 endoscopists during the study period. The average ADR for screening colonoscopies per endoscopist was 36.80% (SD 10.21), 44.08 (SD 10.98) in men and 31.20 (SD 9.65) in women. Adjusted to the US population, the ADR was 39.08%. There was a significant increase in ADR from screening colonoscopies over the study period from 33.93% in 2014 to 38.12% in 2018.

DISCUSSION

The average ADR from a large national US sample standardized to the US population is 39.05% and has increased over time.

摘要

简介

腺瘤检出率(ADR)在各实践中差异很大,且无法获得全国性或基于人群的数据。我们的目的是研究腺瘤检出率(ADR)、随时间变化的率的变异性以及与腺瘤检出率相关的因素,该研究基于全国范围内接受结肠镜检查的患者的样本。

方法

我们使用 2014 年至 2018 年 GI 质量改进联盟有限公司注册系统中提交的结肠镜检查数据,纳入年龄在 50-89 岁的成年人。我们使用分层逻辑回归模型来研究与 ADR 相关的因素。

结果

在研究期间,共有 1169 名内镜医生进行了 2646833 例结肠镜检查。每位内镜医生的筛查结肠镜检查的平均 ADR 为 36.80%(SD 10.21),男性为 44.08%(SD 10.98),女性为 31.20%(SD 9.65)。校正为美国人群后,ADR 为 39.08%。在研究期间,ADR 从筛查结肠镜检查中呈显著增加趋势,从 2014 年的 33.93%增加到 2018 年的 38.12%。

讨论

基于美国人群标准化的大型美国全国样本的平均 ADR 为 39.05%,并且呈上升趋势。

相似文献

1
Benchmarking Adenoma Detection Rates for Colonoscopy: Results From a US-Based Registry.基于美国注册研究的结肠镜腺瘤检出率的基准测试。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 1;116(9):1946-1949. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001358.
2
Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.提供锯齿状息肉检出率基准数据:新罕布什尔结肠镜检查登记处的分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1188-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.基于新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据,在筛查性结肠镜检查与监测性结肠镜检查中,腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的检出率存在差异。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;11(10):1308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.042. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.腺瘤检出率增高与结直肠癌发病风险和死亡风险降低相关。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jul;153(1):98-105. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
5
Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.肠道准备质量良好对腺瘤和锯齿状息肉检测的影响:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据,采用标准化的准备质量评级
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep;80(3):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 May 10.
6
Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.影响结肠镜检查质量的内镜医师特征。
Endoscopy. 2016 Mar;48(3):241-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100185. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
7
Screening colonoscopy: High quality regardless of endoscopist specialty.结肠镜筛查:无论内镜医生的专业如何,都能保证高质量。
Am J Surg. 2019 Mar;217(3):442-444. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
8
Variation Over Time and Factors Associated With Detection Rates of Sessile Serrated Lesion Across the United States: Results Form a National Sample Using the GIQuIC Registry.美国固有锯齿状病变检出率随时间的变化及相关因素:利用 GIQuIC 登记处进行全国抽样的结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 1;116(1):95-99. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000824.
9
Adenoma Detection Rate in Asymptomatic Patients with Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests.无症状粪便免疫化学检测阳性患者的腺瘤检出率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 May;63(5):1167-1172. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4984-9. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.腺瘤和近端无蒂锯齿状息肉检出率与内镜医师特征的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):627-635. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564.

引用本文的文献

1
Texture and Color Enhanced Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colonic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis.纹理和颜色增强成像在结肠肿瘤诊断中的应用:一项系统评价与分析
JGH Open. 2025 Aug 17;9(8):e70191. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70191. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Traditional and Novel Colonoscopy Quality Metrics: What's Important in 2025.传统与新型结肠镜检查质量指标:2025年的关键要点
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 Aug 8;27(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-01006-1.
3
ARE QUALITY INDICATORS IMPORTANT IN COLONOSCOPIES? ANALYSIS OF 3,076 EXAMS IN A PRIVATE TERTIARY SERVICE IN SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL.
结肠镜检查中的质量指标重要吗?对巴西东南部一家私立三级医疗机构的3076例检查的分析。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025 Feb 10;37:e1864. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400070e1864. eCollection 2025.
4
Colonoscopy Remains an Important Option for Primary Screening for Colorectal Cancer.结肠镜检查仍然是结直肠癌初级筛查的重要选择。
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 May;70(5):1595-1605. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08760-8. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
5
Overall Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate Measure for Screening Efficacy Independent of Histopathology: Evidence from National Endoscopy Database.作为独立于组织病理学的筛查效果替代指标的总体息肉检出率:来自国家内镜数据库的证据。
Life (Basel). 2024 May 21;14(6):654. doi: 10.3390/life14060654.
6
Clinical Outcomes from the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Colorectal Cancer Control Program: 2009-2015.阿拉斯加原住民部落健康联合会结直肠癌防治计划的临床结果:2009-2015 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 26;21(5):552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050552.
7
Development and status quo of digestive endoscopy in China: An analysis based on the national census in 2013 and 2020.中国消化内镜的发展与现状:基于2013年和2020年全国普查的分析
J Transl Int Med. 2024 May 21;12(2):177-187. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2023-0115. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Latin America: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.拉丁美洲的结直肠癌筛查项目:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2354256. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54256.
9
Development, quality, and influencing factors of colonoscopy in China: results from the national census in 2013 and 2020.中国结肠镜检查的发展、质量及影响因素:2013年和2020年全国普查结果
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 22;13:1276520. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1276520. eCollection 2023.
10
Multiple colorectal adenomas in Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征中的多发性结直肠腺瘤
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 20;12:1038678. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1038678. eCollection 2022.