Wachtel D, Pfister W, Goebel H, Knüpper H, Müller P, Wöllner H
Z Urol Nephrol. 1977 Nov;70(11):815-21.
In patients with prostatovesiculitis the qualitative proof of microorganisms from experiment or ejaculate has only an insignificant diagnostic value on account of the lacking possibility of the recognition of contamination germs, It may be concluded to a prostatitis caused by bacteria, when the number of germs established in the exprimate is unequivocally larger than this one in the middle stream urine. In order to use successfully also the differences of the number of germs of ejaculate and middle stream urine for the differentiation between bacterial contamination and prostatovesiculitis, it must be presumed that bacteria of the physiological flora of the urethra may be cultivated in about the same quantity by investigations of the ejaculate as well as of the middle stream urine. Of 100 males without inflammatory disease in the region of the urogenital tract, therefore, middle stream urine and ejaculate or exprimate-containing urine were examined bacteriologically. Hereby was recognized that the number of germs in the different ejaculte specimens of healthy men considerably varied in comparison to the middle stream urine or the exprimate-containing urine and, consequently, is scarcely taken into consideration as diagnostic criterion for the prostatovesiculitis.
在患有前列腺精囊炎的患者中,由于无法识别污染菌,从实验或精液中获取微生物的定性证据仅具有微不足道的诊断价值。当在前列腺按摩液中检测到的细菌数量明显多于中段尿中的细菌数量时,可以推断为细菌性前列腺炎。为了成功利用精液和中段尿中细菌数量的差异来区分细菌污染和前列腺精囊炎,必须假定通过对精液和中段尿的检测,尿道生理菌群中的细菌培养数量大致相同。因此,对100名泌尿生殖道无炎症疾病的男性进行了中段尿、精液或含前列腺按摩液尿液的细菌学检查。结果发现,健康男性不同精液标本中的细菌数量与中段尿或含前列腺按摩液尿液相比有很大差异,因此,几乎不能将其作为前列腺精囊炎的诊断标准。